Two-year survival analysis of twisted wire fixed retainer versus spiral wire and fiber-reinforced composite retainers: a preliminary explorative single-blind randomized clinical trial
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: Traditional retainers (both metal and fiber-reinforced composite [FRC]) have limitations, and a retainer made from more flexible ligature wires might be advantageous. We aimed to compare an experimental design with two traditional retainers. Methods: In this prospective preliminary clinical trial, 150 post-treatment patients were enrolled and randomly divided into three groups of 50 patients each to receive mandibular canine-to-canine retainers made of FRC, flexible spiral wire (FSW), and twisted wire (TW). The patients were monitored monthly. The time at which the first signs of breakage/debonding were detected was recorded. The success rates of the retainers were compared using chi-squared, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox proportional-hazard regression analyses (α = 0.05). Results: In total, 42 patients in the FRC group, 41 in the FSW group, and 45 in the TW group completed the study. The 2-year failure rates were 35.7% in the FRC group, 26.8% in the FSW group, and 17.8% in the TW group. These rates differed insignificantly (chi-squared p = 0.167). According to the Kaplan-Meier analysis, failure occurred at 19.95 months in the FRC group, 21.37 months in the FSW group, and 22.36 months in the TW group. The differences between the survival rates in the three groups were not significant (Cox regression p = 0.146). Conclusions: Although the failure rate of the experimental retainer was two times lower than that of the FRC retainer, the difference was not statistically significant. The experimental TW retainer was successful, and larger studies are warranted to verify these results. [Korean J Orthod 2016;46(2):104-110]
Abstract
Objective: Traditional retainers (both metal and fiber-reinforced composite [FRC]) have limitations, and a retainer made from more flexible ligature wires might be advantageous. We aimed to compare an experimental design with two traditional retainers. Methods: In this prospective preliminary clinical trial, 150 post-treatment patients were enrolled and randomly divided into three groups of 50 patients each to receive mandibular canine-to-canine retainers made of FRC, flexible spiral wire (FSW), and twisted wire (TW). The patients were monitored monthly. The time at which the first signs of breakage/debonding were detected was recorded. The success rates of the retainers were compared using chi-squared, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox proportional-hazard regression analyses (α = 0.05). Results: In total, 42 patients in the FRC group, 41 in the FSW group, and 45 in the TW group completed the study. The 2-year failure rates were 35.7% in the FRC group, 26.8% in the FSW group, and 17.8% in the TW group. These rates differed insignificantly (chi-squared p = 0.167). According to the Kaplan-Meier analysis, failure occurred at 19.95 months in the FRC group, 21.37 months in the FSW group, and 22.36 months in the TW group. The differences between the survival rates in the three groups were not significant (Cox regression p = 0.146). Conclusions: Although the failure rate of the experimental retainer was two times lower than that of the FRC retainer, the difference was not statistically significant. The experimental TW retainer was successful, and larger studies are warranted to verify these results. [Korean J Orthod 2016;46(2):104-110]
참고문헌 (35)
- Littlewood SJ, "Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (1), pp.CD002283~ (2006)
- Salehi P, "Comparison of survival time between two types of orthodontic fixed retainer: a prospective randomized clinical trial", Prog Orthod, 14, pp.25~ (2013)
- Störmann I, "A prospective randomized study of different retainer types", J Orofac Orthop, 63, pp.42~50 (2002)
- Zachrisson BU, "Clinical experience with directbonded orthodontic retainers", Am J Orthod, 71, pp.440~448 (1977)
- Zachrisson BU, "The bonded lingual retainer and multiple spacing of anterior teeth", Swed Dent J Suppl, 15, pp.247~255 (1982)
- Bearn DR, "Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 108, pp.207~213 (1995)
- Torkan S, "Clinical and radiographic comparison of the effects of two types of fixed retainers on periodontium-a randomized clinical trial", Prog Orthod, 15, pp.47~ (2014)
- Geserick M, "Bonding fiberreinforced lingual retainers with color-reactivating flowable composite", J Clin Orthod, 38, pp.560~562 (2004)
- Orchin JD, "Permanent lingual bonded retainer", J Clin Orthod, 24, pp.229~231 (1990)
- Meiers JC, "Preimpregnated, fiber-reinforced prostheses. Part II. Direct applications: splints and fixed partial dentures", Quintessence Int, 29, pp.761~768 (1998)
- Iniguez I, "Polyethylene ribbon and fixed orthodontic retention and porcelain veneers: solving an esthetic dilemma", J Esthet Dent, 10, pp.52~59 (1998)
- Karaman AI, "Four applications of reinforced polyethylene fiber material in orthodontic practice", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 121, pp.650~654 (2002)
- Rose E, "Clinical comparison of a multistranded wire and a direct-bonded polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin composite used for lingual retention", Quintessence Int, 33, pp.579~583 (2002)
- Durbin DD, "Relapse and the need for permanent fixed retention", J Clin Orthod, 35, pp.723~727 (2001)
- Renkema AM, "Effectiveness of lingual retainers bonded to the canines in preventing mandibular incisor relapse", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 134, pp.179e1~179e8 (2008)
- Foek DL, "Adhesive properties of bonded orthodontic retainers to enamel: stainless steel wire vs fiber-reinforced composites", J Adhes Dent, 11, pp.381~390 (2009)
- Tacken MP, "Glass fibre reinforced versus multistranded bonded orthodontic retainers: a 2 year prospective multi-centre study", Eur J Orthod, 32, pp.117~123 (2010)
- Edman Tynelius G, "Evaluation of orthodontic treatment after 1 year of retention--a randomized controlled trial", Eur J Orthod, 32, pp.542~547 (2010)
- Lai CS, "Orthodontic retention procedures in Switzerland", Swiss Dent J, 124, pp.655~661 (2014)
- Horton JK, "Comparison of the effects of Hawley and perfector", spring aligner retainers on postorthodontic occlusion, 2009, pp.135, 729~736
- Rowland H, "The effectiveness of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers: a singlecenter randomized controlled trial", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 132, pp.730~737 (2007)
- Sfondrini MF, "Clinical evaluation of bond failures and survival between mandibular canine-to-canine retainers made of flexible spiral wire and fiberreinforced composite", J Clin Exp Dent, 6, pp.e145~e149 (2014)
- Radlanski RJ, "Stability of the bonded lingual wire retainer-a study of the initial bond strength", J Orofac Orthop, 65, pp.321~335 (2004)
- Artun J, "A 3-year followup study of various types of orthodontic canine-tocanine retainers", Eur J Orthod, 19, pp.501~509 (1997)
- Vallittu PK, "Flexural properties of acrylic resin polymers reinforced with unidirectional and woven glass fibers", J Prosthet Dent, 81, pp.318~326 (1999)
- Bearn DR, "Bonded orthodontic retainers: the wire-composite interface", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 111, pp.67~74 (1997)
- Sobouti F, "Effects of laser-assisted cosmetic smile lift gingivectomy on postoperative bleeding and pain in fixed orthodontic patients: a controlled clinical trial", Prog Orthod, 15, pp.66~ (2014)
- Bolla E, "Failure evaluation after a 6-year retention period: a comparison between glass fiber-reinforced (GFR)and multistranded bonded retainers", Int Orthod, 10, pp.16~28 (2012)
- Ferreira ZA, "Bondable reinforcement ribbon: clinical applications", Quintessence Int, 31, pp.547~552 (2000)
- Chong KH, "Strength and mode of failure of unidirectional and bidirectional glass fiberreinforced composite materials", Int J Prosthodont, 16, pp.161~166 (2003)
- Artun J, "Caries and periodontal reactions associated with long-term use of different types of bonded lingual retainers", Am J Orthod, 86, pp.112~118 (1984)
- Tanaka E, "Longitudinal measurements of tooth mobility during orthodontic treatment using a periotest", Angle Orthod, 75, pp.101~105 (2005)
- Chung K, "Flexural strength of a provisional resin material with fibre addition", J Oral Rehabil, 25, pp.214~217 (1998)
- Dyer SR, "Effect of fiber position and orientation on fracture load of fiber-reinforced composite", Dent Mater, 20, pp.947~955 (2004)
- Ellakwa AE, "The influence of fibre placement and position on the efficiency of reinforcement of fibre reinforced composite bridgework", J Oral Rehabil, 28, pp.785~791 (2001)