본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The effect of bonded resin surface area on the detachment force of lingual bonded fixed retainers: An in vitro study

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Objective: The aims of this study were to evaluate the relationship between the detachment force and bonding resin surface are and to determine the resin bonding surface area that [Korean J Orthod 2014;44(1):20-27]would provide adequate bonding strength with minimum resin volume. Methods: One hundred and sixty human premolars were randomly divided into 4 groups of 40 teeth each. The diameter of the resin surface area in each group was as follows: group 1, 1.5 mm; group 2, 2.5 mm; group 3, 3.5 mm; and group 4, 4.5 mm. Respond Dead Soft straight (length 0.0175 inch) was used to fabricate the retainers, and TransbondTM XT was used to fix the retainers to the tooth surfaces. A pair of teeth was embedded in acrylic blocks for each specimen. Thus, each group comprised 20 samples. Fixed retainers were bonded to the teeth, and vertical force was applied at the middle of wire. The force was measured using a universal testing machine. Results: The mean value of detachment force was the highest for group 4 (102.38 ± 2.92 N), followed by group 3 (63.54 ± 2.21 N), group 2 (51.95 ± 1.61 N), and group 1 (24.14 ± 1.38 N). Conclusions: The detachment force of lingual fixed retainers was significantly affected as the area of the resin bonding surface increased. Considering the minimum bonding strength of brackets, a resin bonding surface area with a diameter of 3.5 mm would provide adequate bonding strength.

Abstract

Objective: The aims of this study were to evaluate the relationship between the detachment force and bonding resin surface are and to determine the resin bonding surface area that [Korean J Orthod 2014;44(1):20-27]would provide adequate bonding strength with minimum resin volume. Methods: One hundred and sixty human premolars were randomly divided into 4 groups of 40 teeth each. The diameter of the resin surface area in each group was as follows: group 1, 1.5 mm; group 2, 2.5 mm; group 3, 3.5 mm; and group 4, 4.5 mm. Respond Dead Soft straight (length 0.0175 inch) was used to fabricate the retainers, and TransbondTM XT was used to fix the retainers to the tooth surfaces. A pair of teeth was embedded in acrylic blocks for each specimen. Thus, each group comprised 20 samples. Fixed retainers were bonded to the teeth, and vertical force was applied at the middle of wire. The force was measured using a universal testing machine. Results: The mean value of detachment force was the highest for group 4 (102.38 ± 2.92 N), followed by group 3 (63.54 ± 2.21 N), group 2 (51.95 ± 1.61 N), and group 1 (24.14 ± 1.38 N). Conclusions: The detachment force of lingual fixed retainers was significantly affected as the area of the resin bonding surface increased. Considering the minimum bonding strength of brackets, a resin bonding surface area with a diameter of 3.5 mm would provide adequate bonding strength.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Little RM, "An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10to 20 years postretention", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 93, pp.423~428 (1988)
  2. Little RM, "Serial extraction of first premolars-postretention evaluation of stability and relapse", Angle Orthod, 60, pp.255~262 (1990)
  3. Little RM, "Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment-first premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics", Am J Orthod, 80, pp.349~365 (1981)
  4. Littlewood SJ, "Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (1), pp.CD002283~ (2006)
  5. Nanda RS, "Considerations of dentofacial growth in long-term retention and stability: is active retention needed?", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 101, pp.297~302 (1992)
  6. Zachrisson BU, "Clinical experience with directbonded orthodontic retainers", Am J Orthod, 71, pp.440~448 (1977)
  7. Zachrisson BU, "Orthodontics, state of the art, essence of the science" (1986), Mosby
  8. Bearn DR, "Bonded orthodontic retainers: the wire-composite interface", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 111, pp.67~74 (1997)
  9. Cooke ME, "Debonding force and deformation of two multi-stranded lingual retainer wires bonded to incisor enamel: an in vitro study", Eur J Orthod, 32, pp.741~746 (2010)
  10. Asli Baysal, "Comparison of three different orthodontic wires for bonded lingual retainer fabrication", 대한치과교정학회지, 42(1), pp.39~46 (2012), 대한치과교정학회
  11. 강대근, "Flowable Resin을 이용한 접착식 보정장치의 결합강도 연구", 대한치과재료학회지, 31(4), pp.283~290 (2004), 대한치과재료학회
  12. Artun J, "Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment", Am J Orthod, 85, pp.333~340 (1984)
  13. Al Yami EA, "Stability of orthodontic treatment outcome: followup until 10 years postretention", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 115, pp.300~304 (1999)
  14. Tae-Yub Kwon, "Direct and indirect bonding of wire retainers to bovine enamel using three resin systems: shear bond strength comparisons", 대한치과교정학회지, 41(6), pp.447~453 (2011), 대한치과교정학회
  15. sterle LJ, "Enhancing wire-composite bond strength of bonded retainers with wire surface treatment", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 119, pp.625~631 (2001)
  16. Radlanski RJ, "Stability of the bonded lingual wire retainer-a study of the initial bond strength", J Orofac Orthop, 65, pp.321~335 (2004)
  17. Dahlberg G, "Statistical methods for medical and biological students" (1940), George Allen & Unwin
  18. 이형철, "접착방법 및 multistranded wire의 종류에 따른접착식 보정장치의 전단접착강도에 관한 연구", 대한치과교정학회지, 32(2), pp.143~153 (2002), 대한치과교정학회
  19. Scougall Vilchis RJ, "Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different self-etching adhesives", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 136, pp.425~430 (2009)
  20. Hajrassie MK, "In-vivo and in-vitro comparison of bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel and debonded at various times", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 131, pp.384~390 (2007)
  21. Tavas MA, "A visible light-activated direct bonding material: an in vitro comparative study", Br J Orthod, 11, pp.33~37 (1984)
  22. Murray SD, "Comparison of in vivo and in vitro shear bond strength", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 123, pp.2~9 (2003)
  23. Bearn DR, "Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 108, pp.207~213 (1995)
  24. Artun J, "The effect of orthodontic treatment on periodontal bone support in patients with advanced loss of marginal periodontium", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 93, pp.143~148 (1988)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)