Type of tooth movement during en masse retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth using labial versus lingual biocreative therapy in adults: A randomized clinical trial
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: The objective of this two-arm parallel trial was to compare the type of tooth movement during en masse retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth using labial versus lingual biocreative therapy. Methods: Twenty-eight subjects were randomized in a 1 : 1 ratio to either the labial or lingual group. En masse anterior retraction was performed using labial biocreative therapy in group A and lingual biocreative therapy in group B. Cone beam computed tomography scans were taken before and after retraction and the primary outcome was the type of tooth movement during anterior retraction. Data were analyzed using paired t -tests for comparisons within each group and independent-sample t-test for comparison of the mean treatment changes between the two groups. Results: Significant differences were found between the two groups in relation to the type of tooth movement (labiolingual inclination of the central incisor; mean difference, 5.85 ± 1.85o). The canine showed significant distal tipping in the lingual group (mean difference, 6.98 ± 1.25o). The canine was significantly more intruded in the lingual group (mean difference, 1.67 ± 0.49 mm). Good anchorage control and significant soft tissue changes occurred in both groups. No serious adverse effects were detected. Conclusions: With a 10-mm retraction hook, the labial biocreative technique with the reverse curve overlay provided anterior retraction with good torque control, while in the lingual group, anterior retraction occurred with controlled tipping movement with significant distal tipping and intrusion of the canine (trial registration: The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT03239275]).
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this two-arm parallel trial was to compare the type of tooth movement during en masse retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth using labial versus lingual biocreative therapy. Methods: Twenty-eight subjects were randomized in a 1 : 1 ratio to either the labial or lingual group. En masse anterior retraction was performed using labial biocreative therapy in group A and lingual biocreative therapy in group B. Cone beam computed tomography scans were taken before and after retraction and the primary outcome was the type of tooth movement during anterior retraction. Data were analyzed using paired t -tests for comparisons within each group and independent-sample t-test for comparison of the mean treatment changes between the two groups. Results: Significant differences were found between the two groups in relation to the type of tooth movement (labiolingual inclination of the central incisor; mean difference, 5.85 ± 1.85o). The canine showed significant distal tipping in the lingual group (mean difference, 6.98 ± 1.25o). The canine was significantly more intruded in the lingual group (mean difference, 1.67 ± 0.49 mm). Good anchorage control and significant soft tissue changes occurred in both groups. No serious adverse effects were detected. Conclusions: With a 10-mm retraction hook, the labial biocreative technique with the reverse curve overlay provided anterior retraction with good torque control, while in the lingual group, anterior retraction occurred with controlled tipping movement with significant distal tipping and intrusion of the canine (trial registration: The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT03239275]).
참고문헌 (21)
- Antoszewska-Smith J, "Effectiveness of orthodontic miniscrew implants in anchorage reinforcement during en-masse retraction : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 151, pp.440~455 (2017)
- Eui-Hyang Sung, "Distalization pattern of whole maxillary dentition according to force application points", 대한치과교정학회지, 45(1), pp.20~28 (2015), 대한치과교정학회
- Lee KJ, "The biomechanical foundation of clinical orthodontics", pp.435~ (2015), Quintessence Publishing
- Chung KR, "Anterior torque control using partial-osseointegrated miniimplants : biocreative therapy type I technique", World J Orthod, 9, pp.95~104 (2008)
- Chung KR, "Anterior torque control using partial-osseointegrated miniimplants : biocreative therapy type II technique", World J Orthod, 9, pp.105~113 (2008)
- Mo SS, "Factors controlling anterior torque with C-implants depend on en-masse retraction without posterior appliances : biocreative therapy type II technique", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 139, pp.e183~e199 (2011)
- Burstone CJ, "The segmented arch approach to space closure", Am J Orthod, 82, pp.361~378 (1982)
- Chung KR, "Class II malocclusion treated by combining a lingual retractor and a palatal plate", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 133, pp.112~123 (2008)
- Chung KR, "Unusual extraction treatment in Class II division 1using C-orthodontic mini-implants", Angle Orthod, 77, pp.155~166 (2007)
- Kyu-Rhim Chung, "Severe bidentoalveolar protrusion treated with lingual Biocreative therapy using palatal miniplate", 대한치과교정학회지, 40(4), pp.276~287 (2010), 대한치과교정학회
- Kim SH, "Analysis of temporary skeletal anchorage devices used for en-masse retraction : a preliminary study", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 136, pp.268~276 (2009)
- Kim JS, "Analysis of lingual en masse retraction combining a C-lingual retractor and a palatal plate", Angle Orthod, 81, pp.662~669 (2011)
- Mo SS, "Factors controlling anterior torque during C-implant-dependent en-masse retraction without posterior appliances", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 140, pp.72~80 (2011)
- 모성서, "Torque control during lingual anterior retraction without posterior appliances", 대한치과교정학회지, 43(1), pp.3~14 (2013), 대한치과교정학회
- Jeong-Hyun Jee, "En-masse retraction with a preformed nickel-titanium and stainless steel archwire assembly and temporary skeletal anchorage devices without posterior bonding", 대한치과교정학회지, 44(5), pp.236~245 (2014), 대한치과교정학회
- Jang HJ, "Locating the center of resistance of maxillary anterior teeth retracted by Double J Retractor with palatal miniscrews", Angle Orthod, 80, pp.1023~1028 (2010)
- 서경원, "Displacement pattern of the anterior segment using antero-posterior lingual retractor combined with a palatal plate", 대한치과교정학회지, 45(6), pp.289~298 (2015), 대한치과교정학회
- Tominaga JY, "Effect of bracket slot and archwire dimensions on anterior tooth movement during space closure in sliding mechanics : a 3-dimensional finite element study", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 146, pp.166~174 (2014)
- Sung SJ, "Effective en-masse retraction design with orthodontic miniimplant anchorage : a finite element analysis", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137, pp.648~657 (2010)
- Bourauel C, "Retraktion der oberen Schneidezähne mit pseudoelastischen Behandlungselementen-Rechnerische und biomechanische Prüfung sowie klinische Anwendung", J Orofac Orthop, 55, pp.36~44 (1994)
- Melsen B, "Vertical force considerations in differential space closure", J Clin Orthod, 14, pp.678~683 (1990)