Influence of different universal adhesives on the repair performance of hybrid CAD-CAM materials
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the microshear bond strength (μSBS) of different universal adhesive systems applied to hybrid computer-aided design/computeraided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) restorative materials repaired with a composite resin. Materials and Methods: Four types of CAD-CAM hybrid block materials—Lava Ultimate (LA), Vita Enamic (VE), CeraSmart (CS), and Shofu Block HC (SH)—were used in this study, in combination with the following four adhesive protocols: 1) control: porcelain primer + total etch adhesive (CO), 2) Single Bond Universal (SB), 3) All Bond Universal (AB), and 4) Clearfil Universal Bond (CU). The μSBS of the composite resin (Clearfil Majesty Esthetic) was measured and the data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test, with the level of significance set at p < 0.05. Results: The CAD-CAM block type and block-adhesive combination had significant effects on the bond strength values (p < 0.05). Significant differences were found between the following pairs of groups: VE/CO and VE/AB, CS/CO and CS/AB, VE/CU and CS/CU, and VE/ AB and CS/AB (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The μSBS values were affected by hybrid block type. All tested universal adhesive treatments can be used as an alternative to the control treatment for repair, except the AB system on VE blocks (the VE/AB group). The μSBS values showed variation across different adhesive treatments on different hybrid CAD-CAM block types.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the microshear bond strength (μSBS) of different universal adhesive systems applied to hybrid computer-aided design/computeraided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) restorative materials repaired with a composite resin. Materials and Methods: Four types of CAD-CAM hybrid block materials—Lava Ultimate (LA), Vita Enamic (VE), CeraSmart (CS), and Shofu Block HC (SH)—were used in this study, in combination with the following four adhesive protocols: 1) control: porcelain primer + total etch adhesive (CO), 2) Single Bond Universal (SB), 3) All Bond Universal (AB), and 4) Clearfil Universal Bond (CU). The μSBS of the composite resin (Clearfil Majesty Esthetic) was measured and the data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test, with the level of significance set at p < 0.05. Results: The CAD-CAM block type and block-adhesive combination had significant effects on the bond strength values (p < 0.05). Significant differences were found between the following pairs of groups: VE/CO and VE/AB, CS/CO and CS/AB, VE/CU and CS/CU, and VE/ AB and CS/AB (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The μSBS values were affected by hybrid block type. All tested universal adhesive treatments can be used as an alternative to the control treatment for repair, except the AB system on VE blocks (the VE/AB group). The μSBS values showed variation across different adhesive treatments on different hybrid CAD-CAM block types.
참고문헌 (26)
- Lise DP, "Microtensile bond strength of composite cement to novel CAD", CAM materials as a function of surface treatment and aging, 2017, pp.42, 73~81
- Della Bona A, "Characterization of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material", Dent Mater, 30, pp.564~569 (2014)
- Bottino MA, "Inlays made from a hybrid material : adaptation and bond strengths", Oper Dent, 40, pp.E83~E91 (2015)
- Coldea A, "Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials", Dent Mater, 29, pp.419~426 (2013)
- Dirxen C, "Clinical performance of a new biomimetic double network material", Open Dent J, 7, pp.118~122 (2013)
- Fasbinder DJ, "Surface evaluation of polishing techniques for new resilient CAD", CAM restorative materials, 2016, pp.28, 56~66
- Quinn GD, "Chipping fracture resistance of dental CAD", CAM restorative materials : part I--procedures and results, 2014, pp.30, e99~e111
- Ferrari M, "Fracture resistance of three porcelain-layered CAD", CAM zirconia frame designs, 2014, pp.30, e163~e168
- Gordan VV, "The decision to repair or replace a defective restoration is affected by who placed the original restoration : findings from the National Dental PBRN", J Dent, 42, pp.1528~1534 (2014)
- Kimmich M, "Intraoral treatment of veneering porcelain chipping of fixed dental restorations : a review and clinical application", J Am Dent Assoc, 144, pp.31~44 (2013)
- Stawarczyk B, "Tensile bond strength of resin composite repair in vitro using different surface preparation conditionings to an aged CAD", CAM resin nanoceramic, 2015, pp.19, 299~308
- Muñoz MA, "In vitro longevity of bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentin", Oper Dent, 40, pp.282~292 (2015)
- Cardoso MV, "Current aspects on bonding effectiveness and stability in adhesive dentistry", Aust Dent J, 56(Suppl 1), pp.31~44 (2011)[DOI]
- Üstün Ö, "Shear bond strength of repair systems to new CAD", CAM restorative materials, 2018, pp.27, 748~754
- Al-Thagafi R, "Influence of surface conditioning protocols on reparability of CAD", CAM zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic, 2016, pp.18, 135~141
- Elsaka SE, "Repair bond strength of resin composite to a novel CAD", CAM hybrid ceramic using different repair systems, 2015, pp.34, 161~167
- Loomans B, "Intraoral repair of direct and indirect restorations : procedures and guidelines", Oper Dent, 41, pp.S68~S78 (2016)
- Duarte S, "Ceramic-reinforced polymers : CAD", CAM hybrid restorative materials, 2016, pp.3, 198~202
- Gracis S, "A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials", Int J Prosthodont, 28, pp.227~235 (2015)
- Toledano M, "Durability of resin-dentin bonds : effects of direct", indirect exposure and storage media, 2007, pp.23, 885~892
- Lauvahutanon S, "Mechanical properties of composite resin blocks for CAD", CAM, 2014, pp.33, 705~710
- Isolan CP, "Bond strength of a universal bonding agent and other contemporary dental adhesives applied on enamel, dentin, composite, and porcelain", Appl Adhes Sci, 2, pp.25~ (2014)
- Barutcigil K, "Effect of different surface treatments on bond strength of resin cement to a CAD", CAM restorative material, 2019, pp.28, 71~78
- 유지영, "Porcelain repair - Influence of different systems and surface treatments on resin bond strength", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 7(5), pp.343~348 (2015), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Kassotakis EM, "Evaluation of the effect of different surface treatments on luting CAD", CAM composite resin overlay workpieces, 2015, pp.17, 521~528
- Baena E, "Influence of repair procedure on composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength", Am J Dent, 28, pp.255~260 (2015)