한어병음 ‘iong’ 운모의 撮口呼 귀속 문제에 대한 논의
A Discussion on the Belonging of Yunmu ‘iong’ to Cuokou Hu
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is about the belonging of yunmu ‘iong’ to cuokou hu, which is one type of the Si Hu. Some scholars argue that yunmu ‘iong’ belongs to cuokou hu, and they present its sound value as /yŋ/, while some show that its sound value is /iuŋ/ or /yuŋ/. However, /yŋ/ is very different from the real sound of yunmu ‘iong’ in Mandarin, so the argument that yunmu ‘iong’ belongs to cuokou hu is a kind of unreasonable analysis. Based on the Hanyu Pinyin Fangan(The Scheme of the Chinese phonetic Alphabet) and Hanyu Fangyin Zihui(The vocabulary of Chinese dialects), we argue that the sound value of yunmu ‘iong’ should be transcribed as /iuŋ/, which can support the opinion that yunmu ‘iong’ belongs to qichi hu. In addition, a survey, which asks Mandarin speakers’ intuition of yunmu ‘iong’, was conducted and the result shows that they feel the [i] in yunmu ‘iong’ has more lip roundness than a usual [i], but the pronunciation is still not [y]. Besides, Duanmu(2007) also presented the sound value of yunmu ‘iong’ as /iuŋ/ on the underlying level and as [iʷ] on the surface level. When we consider all of the materials and research about the current sound of yunmu ‘iong’, it can be concluded that the sound value of yunmu ‘iong’ is /iuŋ/ on the phonemic level, and it has more lip roundness in the real pronunciation. If Si Hu only considers the glide of yunmu, yunmu ‘iong’ can be classified into qichi hu. However, we think that the necessiry of Si Hu in the explanation of Mandarin yunmu is in doubt. Nevertheless, if Si Hu must be used in the explanation of Mandarin yunmu, yunmu ‘iong’ should be treated as a special type of yunmu, which cannot belong to any type of Si Hu.
Abstract
This paper is about the belonging of yunmu ‘iong’ to cuokou hu, which is one type of the Si Hu. Some scholars argue that yunmu ‘iong’ belongs to cuokou hu, and they present its sound value as /yŋ/, while some show that its sound value is /iuŋ/ or /yuŋ/. However, /yŋ/ is very different from the real sound of yunmu ‘iong’ in Mandarin, so the argument that yunmu ‘iong’ belongs to cuokou hu is a kind of unreasonable analysis. Based on the Hanyu Pinyin Fangan(The Scheme of the Chinese phonetic Alphabet) and Hanyu Fangyin Zihui(The vocabulary of Chinese dialects), we argue that the sound value of yunmu ‘iong’ should be transcribed as /iuŋ/, which can support the opinion that yunmu ‘iong’ belongs to qichi hu. In addition, a survey, which asks Mandarin speakers’ intuition of yunmu ‘iong’, was conducted and the result shows that they feel the [i] in yunmu ‘iong’ has more lip roundness than a usual [i], but the pronunciation is still not [y]. Besides, Duanmu(2007) also presented the sound value of yunmu ‘iong’ as /iuŋ/ on the underlying level and as [iʷ] on the surface level. When we consider all of the materials and research about the current sound of yunmu ‘iong’, it can be concluded that the sound value of yunmu ‘iong’ is /iuŋ/ on the phonemic level, and it has more lip roundness in the real pronunciation. If Si Hu only considers the glide of yunmu, yunmu ‘iong’ can be classified into qichi hu. However, we think that the necessiry of Si Hu in the explanation of Mandarin yunmu is in doubt. Nevertheless, if Si Hu must be used in the explanation of Mandarin yunmu, yunmu ‘iong’ should be treated as a special type of yunmu, which cannot belong to any type of Si Hu.
참고문헌 (27)
- 김태경, "쉽게 배우는 중국어 음운학" (2014), 학고방
- 배은한, "中國語 韻母", ionɡ, 중국문학연구, pp.2013, (50)[DOI]
- 배은한, "合口呼와 撮口呼 韻母의 分類體系 및 表記方式 改善案 提言", 중국어문논역총간, (38), pp.147~168 (2016), 중국어문논역학회
- 배은한, "中國語 音韻體系 變化 過程에 反映된 撮口呼의 形成 過程 硏究", 중국문학연구, (66), pp.217~238 (2017), 한국중문학회
- 이재돈, "中國語音韻學" (2007), 학고방
- 北京大中文系語言學敎硏室, "漢語方音字汇" (1989), 文字改革出版社
- 北京大學中文系現代漢語敎硏室, "現代漢語" (2003), 商務印書館
- 陳阿寶, "現代漢語槪論" (2005), 北京語言大學出版社
- 方慶蓉, "試論韻母ong和iong的實際音價", 語文學刊(敎育版), (16) (2014), 內蒙古師範大學成人敎育學院
- 耿振生, "明淸等韻學通論" (1998), 語文出版社
- 黃伯榮, "現代漢語" (2010), 高等敎育出版社
- 黃雪晴, "從《音韻闡微》到普通話的撮口呼」", 湖北社會科學, (3) (2013), 湖北省社会科学联合会⋅湖北省社会科学院
- 林濤, "音韻學槪要" (2004), 商務印書館
- 林濤, "語音學敎程" (2007), 北京大學出版社
- 不妥, "漢語學習", 1986, ~, pp.延邊大學
- 邵敬敏, "現代漢語痛論" (2007), 上海敎育出版社
- 唐作藩, "音韻學敎程" (2002), 北京大學出版社
- 王力, "漢語史稿" (2004), 中華書局
- 王力, "漢語音韻" (2007), 中華書局
- 王力, "漢語語音史" (2008), 中華書局
- 尤敦明, "ong和iong的歸類問題", 上海師範大學學報(哲學社會科學版), (1) (1983), 上海師範大學
- 向熹, "簡明漢語史(上)" (2010), 商務印書館
- 張大鵬, "普通話語音發聲訓練敎程" (2011), 上海書店出版社
- 中國社會科學院語言硏究所詞典編輯室, "現代漢語詞典" (2016), 商務印書館
- 中國文字改革委員會, "關於漢語拼音方案草案的說明", 文字改革, (12) (1957), 語言文字報刊社
- San Duanmu, "The Phonology of Standard Chinese" (2007), Oxford University Press
- Yen-Hwei Lin, "The Sounds of Chinese" (2007), Cambridge University Press
