中國語 音韻體系 變化 過程에 反映된 撮口呼의 形成 過程 硏究
The Formation Process of Cuokou-Hu Reflected in Changes of the Chinese Phonological System
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The objective of this study is to analyze the formation process of ‘Cuokou-Hu’, also referred to as the ‘Phoneme [y]’, and derive a rational conclusion as to when and in which document the ‘Phoneme [y]’ was first formed. Previous studies generally recognize the separation of Ju-Yu Rhyme and Hu-Mo Rhyme categories reflected in Yunlüeyitong, during the midst of the 15th century, as substantial evidence for the formation of the ‘Phoneme [y]’. Besides this general theory, others suggest that the Dong-Zhong Rhyme category’s [yŋ], Jiang-Yang Rhyme category’s [yaŋ], Yu-Mo Rhyme category’s [y], Zhen-Wen Rhyme category’s [yn], Xian-Tian Rhyme category’s [yɛn], Che-Zhe Rhyme category’s [yɛ], Geng-Qing Rhyme category’s [yŋ(yəŋ)], etc. reflected in Zhongyuanyinyun in the early 14th century or the rhyme categories system reflected in Wufangyuanyin in the midst of the 17th century are also evidence of the formation process of the ‘Phoneme [y]’. In other words, academic circles are not in mutual consensus on when the ‘Phoneme [y]’ was actually first formed. This study develops the analyses of previous studies to suggest a new theory on when the ‘Phoneme [y]’ was formed though an in-depth phonological analysis of the separation of Ju Zimuyun and Gu Zimuyun reflected in Gujinyunhuijuyao in the late 13th century. It thoroughly reviews the Xiaoyuns as described in Ju Zimuyun and Gu Zimuyun of Gujinyunhuijuyao, using the Xiaoyuns as described in the Yu Rhyme and Mo Rhyme categories of Hongwuzhengyun as a comparative reference. Based on this analysis, this study suggests new evidence for when the ‘Phoneme [y]’ was formed, unprecedented in previous studies. Thus, the separation of Ju Zimuyun and Gu Zimuyun reflected in Gujinyunhuijuyao in the early 13th century represents the earliest documented evidence of the formation of the ‘Phoneme [y]’, also referred to as ‘Cuokou-Hu’.
Abstract
The objective of this study is to analyze the formation process of ‘Cuokou-Hu’, also referred to as the ‘Phoneme [y]’, and derive a rational conclusion as to when and in which document the ‘Phoneme [y]’ was first formed. Previous studies generally recognize the separation of Ju-Yu Rhyme and Hu-Mo Rhyme categories reflected in Yunlüeyitong, during the midst of the 15th century, as substantial evidence for the formation of the ‘Phoneme [y]’. Besides this general theory, others suggest that the Dong-Zhong Rhyme category’s [yŋ], Jiang-Yang Rhyme category’s [yaŋ], Yu-Mo Rhyme category’s [y], Zhen-Wen Rhyme category’s [yn], Xian-Tian Rhyme category’s [yɛn], Che-Zhe Rhyme category’s [yɛ], Geng-Qing Rhyme category’s [yŋ(yəŋ)], etc. reflected in Zhongyuanyinyun in the early 14th century or the rhyme categories system reflected in Wufangyuanyin in the midst of the 17th century are also evidence of the formation process of the ‘Phoneme [y]’. In other words, academic circles are not in mutual consensus on when the ‘Phoneme [y]’ was actually first formed. This study develops the analyses of previous studies to suggest a new theory on when the ‘Phoneme [y]’ was formed though an in-depth phonological analysis of the separation of Ju Zimuyun and Gu Zimuyun reflected in Gujinyunhuijuyao in the late 13th century. It thoroughly reviews the Xiaoyuns as described in Ju Zimuyun and Gu Zimuyun of Gujinyunhuijuyao, using the Xiaoyuns as described in the Yu Rhyme and Mo Rhyme categories of Hongwuzhengyun as a comparative reference. Based on this analysis, this study suggests new evidence for when the ‘Phoneme [y]’ was formed, unprecedented in previous studies. Thus, the separation of Ju Zimuyun and Gu Zimuyun reflected in Gujinyunhuijuyao in the early 13th century represents the earliest documented evidence of the formation of the ‘Phoneme [y]’, also referred to as ‘Cuokou-Hu’.
참고문헌 (44)
- 곡효운, "撮口呼形成小攷", 중국언어연구, (50), pp.1~22 (2014), 한국중국언어학회
- 구현아, "近代 漢語의 脣音字 介音의 開合口 대립 연구", 중국어문학지, (43), pp.201~228 (2013), 중국어문학회
- 권영실, "표준중국어 개음(介音)의 음성적 특징에 대한 한·중 대조연구", 중국어교육과 연구, (10), pp.1~15 (2009), 한국중국어교육학회
- 권혁준, "近古漢語 聲母 疑·魚·喩母의 대립 문제", 중국어문논총, (26), pp.1~24 (2004), 중국어문연구회
- 金基石, "近代音的熱點問題與朝鮮對音文獻的價値", 延邊大學學報, (6) (2004)
- 金基石, "漢語 韻母與朝鮮文獻的對音", 民族語文, (1) (2007)
- 김태완, "≪音韻闡微≫의 音韻 體系와 淸代 官話", 중국인문과학, (28), pp.27~44 (2004), 중국인문학회
- 寧繼福, "中原音韻表稿" (1985), 吉林文史出版社
- 唐作藩, "音韻學敎程" (1987), 北京大學出版社
- 羅常培, "漢語音韻學導論" (1982), 里仁書局
- 萬獻初, "撮口呼形成、發展與應用的歷時進程", 勵耘學刊(語言卷), (1) (2011)
- 박영애, "한국사회에 유입된 한자 음역어의 시기별 유입과정 분석", 국제언어문학, (34), pp.67~102 (2016), 국제언어문학회
- 楊耐思, "中原音韻音系" (1981), 中國社會科學出版社
- 엄익상, "중국어 음운론과 응용" (2012), 한국문화사
- 여병창, "韓國 漢字音 終聲과 漢語 韻尾 比較 考察", 외국학연구, (19), pp.79~94 (2012), 외국학연구소
- 葉寶奎, "明淸官話音系" (2001), 厦門大學出版社
- 오광근, "한국어 교재의 발음기호 제시 현황과 문제점 —단모음을 중심으로", 반교어문연구, (26), pp.53~80 (2009), 반교어문학회
- 오광근, "한국어 교재의 발음기호 제시 방법 고찰 —기초 단계에서의 자모 ‘ㅟ, ㅚ, ㅢ’ 발음기호를 중심으로", 반교어문연구, (32), pp.173~202 (2012), 반교어문학회
- 王力, "漢語音韻學" (1986), 山東敎育出版社
- 王力, "漢語講話" (1985), 山東敎育出版社
- 王力, "漢語史稿" (1988), 山東敎育出版社
- 王力, "現代漢語語音分析中的幾個問題", 中國語文, (4) (1979)
- 王力, "漢語語音的系統性及其發展的規律性(下)", 社會科學戰線, (2) (1980), 吉林省社會科學院
- 王力, "漢語語音史" (1985), 中國社會科學出版社
- 的歸類問題, "上海師範大學學報(哲學社會科學版)", 1983, ~
- 的“丢音”現象給語音敎學帶來的問題, "上海師範大學學報(哲學社會科學版)", 1985, ~
- 陸志韋, "釋 《中原音韻》", 燕京學報, (31) (1946)
- 陸志韋, "記蘭茂 《韻略易通》", 燕京學報, (32) (1947)
- 이경철, "中古漢語 撮口呼의 音韻 再考 -韓日 漢字音의 例를 中心으로-", 일본연구, (40), pp.297~309 (2009), 일본연구소
- 李新魁, "漢語音韻學" (1986), 北京出版社
- 李海雨, "현대 중국어 介音의 성격과 표기에 대한 고찰", 중국어문학논집, 25, pp.125~142 (2003), 중국어문학연구회
- 이호영, "국어음성학" (1996), 태학사
- 임동석, "漢語에 있어서의 ‘四呼’와 介音에 依한 音韻 變化 硏究", 건대학술지, 35 (1991)
- 林燕慧, "중국어 말소리" (2010), 역락
- 张建侃, "ü怎样教", 文字改革, (13) (1958)
- 章炳麟, "小學略說" (2003), 遼海出版社
- 정영지, "四呼의 名稱考", 언어과학연구, 1(30), pp.321~334 (2004), 언어과학회
- 趙錦華, "蘭茂 《韻略易通》韻母系統硏究（一）", 咸寧學院學報, 31(1) (2011), 湖北科技學院
- 趙蔭棠, "中原音韻硏究" (1936), 商務印書館
- 주성일, "조선시대 학습용 중국어와 明代 官話의 성질", 중국문학연구, (36), pp.207~246 (2008), 한국중문학회
- 주성일, "《四聲通解》에 반영된 近代漢語 어음 연구", 중국문학연구, (42), pp.293~328 (2011), 한국중문학회
- 최영애, "중국어란 무엇인가" (2008), 통나무출판사
- 竺家寧, "古今韻會擧要的語音系統" (1986), 臺灣學生書局
- 何九盈, "中國古代語言學史" (2000), 河南人民出版社