Effect of surface anodization on stability of orthodontic microimplant
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: To determine the effect of surface anodization on the interfacial strength between an orthodontic microimplant (MI) and the rabbit tibial bone, particularly in the initial phase aft er placement. Methods: A total of 36 MIs were driven into the tibias of 3 mature rabbits by using the self-drilling method and then removed aft er 6 weeks. Half the MIs were as-machined (n = 18; machined group), while the remaining had anodized surfaces (n = 18; anodized group). Th e peak insertion torque (PIT) and the peak removal torque (PRT) values were measured for the 2 groups of MIs. Th ese values were then used to calculate the interfacial shear strength between the MI and cortical bone. Results: Th ere were no statistical differences in terms of PIT between the 2 groups. However, mean PRT was signifi cantly greater for the anodized implants (3.79 ± 1.39 Ncm) than for the machined ones (2.05 ± 1.07 Ncm) (p < 0.01). The interfacial strengths, converted from PRT, were calculated at 10.6 MPa and 5.74 MPa for the anodized and machined group implants, respectively. Conclusions: Anodization of orthodontic MIs may enhance their early-phase retention capability, thereby ensuring a more reliable source of absolute anchorage.
Abstract
Objective: To determine the effect of surface anodization on the interfacial strength between an orthodontic microimplant (MI) and the rabbit tibial bone, particularly in the initial phase aft er placement. Methods: A total of 36 MIs were driven into the tibias of 3 mature rabbits by using the self-drilling method and then removed aft er 6 weeks. Half the MIs were as-machined (n = 18; machined group), while the remaining had anodized surfaces (n = 18; anodized group). Th e peak insertion torque (PIT) and the peak removal torque (PRT) values were measured for the 2 groups of MIs. Th ese values were then used to calculate the interfacial shear strength between the MI and cortical bone. Results: Th ere were no statistical differences in terms of PIT between the 2 groups. However, mean PRT was signifi cantly greater for the anodized implants (3.79 ± 1.39 Ncm) than for the machined ones (2.05 ± 1.07 Ncm) (p < 0.01). The interfacial strengths, converted from PRT, were calculated at 10.6 MPa and 5.74 MPa for the anodized and machined group implants, respectively. Conclusions: Anodization of orthodontic MIs may enhance their early-phase retention capability, thereby ensuring a more reliable source of absolute anchorage.
참고문헌 (33)
- Park HS, "Micro-implant anchorage for treatment of skeletal Class I bialveolar protrusion", J Clin Orthod, 35, pp.417~422 (2001)
- Bae SM, "Clinical application of micro-implant anchorage", J Clin Orthod, 36, pp.298~302 (2002)
- Kyung HM, "Develop ment of orthodontic micro-implants for intraoral anchorage", J Clin Orthod, 37, pp.321~328 (2003)
- Kuroda S, "Clinical use of miniscrew implants as orthodontic anchorage: success rates and postoperative discomfort", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 131, pp.9~15 (2007)
- Baek SH, "Success rate and risk factors associated with mini-implants reinstalled in the maxilla", Angle Orthod, 78, pp.895~901 (2008)
- Wu TY, "Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 67, pp.1595~1599 (2009)
- Kim SH, "Rotational Resistance of Surface-Treated Mini-implants", ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 79, pp.899~907, MOSBY-ELSEVIER
- 전미선, "분사처리 후 산부식 표면처리된 교정용 미니 임플랜트의 골유착능에 관한 연구", 대한치과교정학회지, 38(5), pp.328~336 (2008), 대한치과교정학회
- Shibli JA, "Influence of implant surface topography on early osseointegration: a histolo gical study in human jaws", J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 80, pp.377~385 (2007)
- Ivanoff CJ, "Histologic evaluation of bone response to oxidized and turned titanium micro-implants in human jawbone", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 18, pp.341~348 (2003)
- Kieswetter K, "The role of implant surface characteristics in the healing of bone", Crit Rev Oral Biol Med, 7, pp.329~345 (1996)
- Cordioli G, "Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp.668~674 (2000)
- Thomas KA, "The effect of surface macrotexture and hydroxylapatite coating on the mechanical strengths and histologic profiles of titanium implant materials", J Biomed Mater Res, 21, pp.1395~1414 (1987)
- Li D, "Biomechanical comparison of the sandblasted and acid-etched and the machined and acidetched titanium surface for dental implants", J Biomed Mater Res, 60, pp.325~332 (2002)
- Cho SA, "A removal torque of the lasertreated titanium implants in rabbit tibia", Biomaterials, 24, pp.4859~4863 (2003)
- 설영택, "The significance of the surface properties of oxidized titanium to the bone response: special emphasis on potential biochemical bonding of oxidized titanium implant", BIOMATERIALS, 24, pp.3893~3907, ELSEVIER SCI LTD
- Son WW, "In vivo histological response to anodized and anodized", hydrothermally treated titanium implants, 2003, pp.66, 520~525
- 설영택, "Resonance frequency and removal torque analysis of implants with turned and anodized surface oxides", CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 13, pp.252~259 (2002), BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
- Jungner M, "Oxidized titanium implants (Nobel Biocare TiUnite) compared with turned titanium implants (Nobel Biocare mark III) with respect to implant failure in a group of consecutive patients treated with early functional loading and two-stage protocol", Clin Oral Implants Res, 16, pp.308~312 (2005)
- Suh JY, "Effect of hydrothermally treated anodic oxide films on osteoblast attachment and proliferation", Biomaterials, 24, pp.347~355 (2003)
- Roberts WE, "Osseous adaptation to continuous loa ding of rigid endosseous implants", Am J Orthod, 86, pp.95~111 (1984)
- Esposito M, "Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology", Eur J Oral Sci, 106, pp.527~551 (1998)
- Olmedo D, "Macrophages related to dental implant failure", Implant Dent, 12, pp.75~80 (2003)
- Sánchez-Gárces MA, "Periimplantitis", Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 9(Suppl), pp.63~74 (2004)
- Zhu X, "Surface analysis of anodic oxide films containing phosphorus on titanium", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 17, pp.331~336 (2002)
- Zhu X, "Surface characteristics and structure of anodic oxide fi lms containing Ca and P on a titanium implant material", J Biomed Mater Res, 60, pp.333~338 (2002)
- Larsson C, "Bone response to surface modified titanium implants - studies on the tissue response after 1 year to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses", J Mater Sci Mater Med, 8, pp.721~729 (1997)
- Frost HM, "A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff ’s Law for clinicians", Angle Orthod, 74, pp.3~15 (2004)
- Motoyoshi M, "Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant", Clin Oral Implants Res, 17, pp.109~114 (2006)
- Kim JW, "Histomorphometric and mechanical analyses of the drill-free screw as orthodontic anchorage", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 128, pp.190~194 (2005)
- 설영택, "Bone reactions to oxidized titanium implants with electrochemical anion sulphuric acid and phosphoric acid incorporation.", Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 4(2), pp.78~87 (2002), B.C. Decker Inc.
- 설영택, "Oxidized titanium screws coated with calcium ions and their performance in rabbit bone", INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 17, pp.625~634 (2002), QUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO INC
- Morais LS, "Titanium alloy mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: immediate loa ding and metal ion release", Acta Biomater, 3, pp.331~339 (2007)