Debonding forces of three different customized bases of a lingual bracket system
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether extension of the custom base is necessary for enhancement of bond strength, by comparing the debonding forces and residual adhesives of 3 different lingual bracket systems. Methods: A total of 42 extracted upper premolars were randomly divided into 3 groups of 14 each for bonding with brackets having (1) a conventional limited resin custom base; (2) an extended gold alloy custom base: Incognito™; and (3) an extended resin custom base: KommonBaseTM. The bonding area was measured by scanning the bracket bases with a 3-dimensional digital scanner. The debonding force was measured with an Instron universal testing machine, which applied an occlusogingival shear force. Results: The mean debonding forces were 60.83 N (standard deviation [SD] 10.12), 69.29 N (SD 9.59), and 104.35 N (SD17.84) for the limited resin custom base, extended gold alloy custom base, and extended resin custom base, respectively. The debonding force observed with the extended resin custom base was significantly different from that observed with the other bases. In addition, the adhesive remnant index was significantly higher with the extended gold alloy custom base. Conclusions: All 3 custom-base lingual brackets can withstand occlusal and orthodontic forces. We conclude that effective bonding of lingual brackets can be obtained without extension of the custom base.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether extension of the custom base is necessary for enhancement of bond strength, by comparing the debonding forces and residual adhesives of 3 different lingual bracket systems. Methods: A total of 42 extracted upper premolars were randomly divided into 3 groups of 14 each for bonding with brackets having (1) a conventional limited resin custom base; (2) an extended gold alloy custom base: Incognito™; and (3) an extended resin custom base: KommonBaseTM. The bonding area was measured by scanning the bracket bases with a 3-dimensional digital scanner. The debonding force was measured with an Instron universal testing machine, which applied an occlusogingival shear force. Results: The mean debonding forces were 60.83 N (standard deviation [SD] 10.12), 69.29 N (SD 9.59), and 104.35 N (SD17.84) for the limited resin custom base, extended gold alloy custom base, and extended resin custom base, respectively. The debonding force observed with the extended resin custom base was significantly different from that observed with the other bases. In addition, the adhesive remnant index was significantly higher with the extended gold alloy custom base. Conclusions: All 3 custom-base lingual brackets can withstand occlusal and orthodontic forces. We conclude that effective bonding of lingual brackets can be obtained without extension of the custom base.
참고문헌 (27)
- Kyung HM, "Individual indirect bonding technique (IIBT) using set-up model", Taehan Chikkwa Uisa Hyophoe Chi, 27, pp.73~82 (1989)
- Wiechmann D, "A new bracket system for lingual orthodontic treatment. Part 1: Theoretical background and development", J Orofac Orthop, 63, pp.234~245 (2002)
- Fillion D, "Clinical advantages of the Orapix-straight wire lingual technique", Int Orthod, 8, pp.125~151 (2010)
- Komori A, "KommonBase for precise direct bonding of lingual orthodontic brackets", Int Orthod, 8, pp.14~27 (2010)
- Artun J, "Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment", Am J Orthod, 85, pp.333~340 (1984)
- Finnema KJ, "In-vitro orthodontic bond strength testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137, pp.615~622 (2010)
- Stanford SK, "The need for standardization of test protocols", Semin Orthod, 3, pp.206~209 (1997)
- Powers JM, "Orthodontic adhesives and bond strength testing", Semin Orthod, 3, pp.147~156 (1997)
- Gittner R, "Influence of various storage media on shear bond strength and enamel fracture when debonding ceramic brackets: an in vitro study", Semin Orthod, 16, pp.49~54 (2010)
- Park SB, "Influence of flowable resins on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets", Dent Mater J, 28, pp.730~734 (2009)
- Ryou DB, "Use of flowable composites for orthodontic bracket bonding", Angle Orthod, 78, pp.1105~1109 (2008)
- D’Attilio M, "Shear bond strength, bond failure, and scanning electron microscopy analysis of a new flowable composite for orthodontic use", Angle Orthod, 75, pp.410~415 (2005)
- Tecco S, "A new one-step dental flowable composite for orthodontic use: an in vitro bond strength study", Angle Orthod, 75, pp.672~677 (2005)
- Mavropoulos A, "Kinetics of light-cure bracket bonding: power density vs exposure duration", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 134, pp.543~547 (2008)
- Silta YT, "Effect of shorter polymerization times when using the latest generation of light-emitting diodes", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 128, pp.744~748 (2005)
- Swanson T, "Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with light-emitting diode curing units at various polymerization times", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 125, pp.337~341 (2004)
- Cacciafesta V, "Effect of light-tip distance on the shear bond strengths of composite resin", Angle Orthod, 75, pp.386~391 (2005)
- Sfondrini MF, "Effect of light-tip distance on the shear bond strengths of resin-modified glass ionomer cured with high-intensity halogen, lightemitting diode, and plasma arc lights", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129, pp.541~546 (2006)
- Klocke A, "Bond strength with custom base indirect bonding techniques", Angle Orthod, 73, pp.176~180 (2003)
- Yi GK, "Shear bond strength comparison between direct and indirect bonded orthodontic brackets", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124, pp.577~581 (2003)
- Linn BJ, "A comparison of bond strength between direct- and indirect-bonding methods", Angle Orthod, 76, pp.289~294 (2006)
- Reynolds IR, "A review of direct orthodontic bonding", Br J Orthod, 2, pp.171~178 (1975)
- Cozza P, "Shear bond strength of metal brackets on enamel", Angle Orthod, 76, pp.851~856 (2006)
- MacColl GA, "The relationship between bond strength and orthodontic bracket base surface area with conventional and microetched foil-mesh bases", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 113, pp.276~281 (1998)
- Wang WN, "Bond strength of various bracket base designs", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 125, pp.65~70 (2004)
- Sharma-Sayal SK, "The influence of orthodontic bracket base design on shear bond strength", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124, pp.74~82 (2003)
- Eliades T, "The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols", Eur J Orthod, 22, pp.13~23 (2000)