본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Accuracy of lingual fixed retainers fabricated using a CAD/CAM bending machine

3

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Objective: Lingual fixed retainers, made from 0.0175-inch 3-strand twisted stainless steel wire (TW) and 0.016 × 0.022-inch straight rectangular wire (RW), are generally used in clinical practice. This study aimed to calculate their accuracy by comparing the discrepancy between computer-aided customized retainers made from these two types of wires. Methods: Eleven orthodontic patients were selected, resulting in 22 maxillary and mandibular threedimensional printing dental models. Two types of lingual fixed retainers were bonded from canine to canine. To determine the accuracy, five points were chosen for each model, resulting in 110 selected points. The absolute values of the distances on the x-, y-, and z-axes were measured to compare the accuracy of the two types of computer-aided retainers. Results: The accuracy of the two types of retainers did not differ significantly in the x- and z-axes, but only in the y-axis (P < 0.01), where RW-fixed retainers exhibited a slightly but significantly increased distance compared to the TW. Conclusions: Both types of retainers showed high accuracy; however, RW had a slight but statistically significant difference along the y-axis compared with TW. This type of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing bending machine is limited to two dimensions, and the dental arch is curved. Therefore, RW may require slight manual adjustment by the practitioner after manufacturing.

Abstract

Objective: Lingual fixed retainers, made from 0.0175-inch 3-strand twisted stainless steel wire (TW) and 0.016 × 0.022-inch straight rectangular wire (RW), are generally used in clinical practice. This study aimed to calculate their accuracy by comparing the discrepancy between computer-aided customized retainers made from these two types of wires. Methods: Eleven orthodontic patients were selected, resulting in 22 maxillary and mandibular threedimensional printing dental models. Two types of lingual fixed retainers were bonded from canine to canine. To determine the accuracy, five points were chosen for each model, resulting in 110 selected points. The absolute values of the distances on the x-, y-, and z-axes were measured to compare the accuracy of the two types of computer-aided retainers. Results: The accuracy of the two types of retainers did not differ significantly in the x- and z-axes, but only in the y-axis (P < 0.01), where RW-fixed retainers exhibited a slightly but significantly increased distance compared to the TW. Conclusions: Both types of retainers showed high accuracy; however, RW had a slight but statistically significant difference along the y-axis compared with TW. This type of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing bending machine is limited to two dimensions, and the dental arch is curved. Therefore, RW may require slight manual adjustment by the practitioner after manufacturing.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Moyers RE, "Handbook of orthodontics", pp.577~ (1988), Year Book Medical Publishers
  2. Thilander B, "Biological basis for orthodontic relapse", Semin Orthod, 6, pp.195~205 (2000)[DOI]
  3. Yu Y, "Interventions for managing relapse of the lower front teeth after orthodontic treatment", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013, pp.CD008734~ (2013)[DOI]
  4. Storey M, "Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers : a randomized controlled trial. Part 2 : periodontal health outcomes after 12 months", Eur J Orthod, 40, pp.399~408 (2018)[DOI]
  5. Pratt MC, "Patient compliance with orthodontic retainers in the postretention phase", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 140, pp.196~201 (2011)[DOI]
  6. Devi S, "Comparative evaluation of patient satisfaction following the use of two different orthodontic removable retainers : a prospective randomized controlled trial", J Int Oral Health, 14, pp.370~376 (2022)[DOI]
  7. Bearn DR, "Bonded orthodontic retainers : a review", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 108, pp.207~213 (1995)[DOI]
  8. Zachrisson BU, "The bonded lingual retainer and multiple spacing of anterior teeth", Swed Dent J Suppl, 15, pp.247~255 (1982)
  9. Engeler OG, "In vitro comparison of the torsional load transfer of various commercially available stainless-steel wires used for fixed retainers in orthodontics", J Orthod, 48, pp.118~126 (2021)[DOI]
  10. Rahimi H, "Three-dimensional analysis of the posttreatment displacements of mandibular anterior teeth with rigid and flexible lingual retainers", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 161, pp.628~637 (2022)[DOI]
  11. Kartal Y, "Comparative evaluation of periodontal effects and survival rates of memotain and five-stranded bonded retainers : a prospective short-term study", J Orofac Orthop, 82, pp.32~41 (2021)[DOI]
  12. Kravitz ND, "Memotain : a CAD", CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainer, 2017, pp.151, 812~815
  13. Namura Y, "Elemental composition, corrosion resistance and mechanical properties of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing fixed retainers versus conventional fixed retainers", J Oral Sci, 66, pp.107~110 (2024)[DOI]
  14. Shim H, "Comparative assessment of relapse and failure between CAD", CAM stainless steel and standard stainless steel fixed retainers in orthodontic retention patientss : a randomized controlled trial, 2022, pp.92, 87~94
  15. Kang SH, "Accuracy and stability of computer-aided customized lingual fixed retainer : a pilot study", Prog Orthod, 23, pp.39~ (2022)[DOI]
  16. Wolf M, "Novel lingual retainer created using CAD", CAM technology, 2015, pp.76, 164~174
  17. Alrawas MB, "Comparing the effects of CAD", CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainers on teeth stability and periodontal health with conventional fixed and removable retainers : a randomized clinical trial, 2021, pp.24, 241~250
  18. Çokakoğlu S, "Stability and failure rate during 3 years of fixed retention : a follow-up of an randomized clinical trial on adolescents with four different lingual retainers", Orthod Craniofac Res, 27, pp.251~258 (2024)[DOI]
  19. Littlewood SJ, "Retention and relapse in clinical practice", Aust Dent J, 62, pp.51~57 (2017)[DOI]
  20. Roussarie F, "Unwanted tooth movement produced by the bonded retention wire : the"wire syndrome, "observations, theories, clinical consequences : second part", J Dentofacial Anom Orthod, 21, pp.503~ (2018)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

Innovative customized CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainer versus standard stainless-steel lingual retainer: A randomized controlled trialAlbert Adelin, Bruwier Annick, Charavet Carole, Gelin Emilie, Seidel Laurence대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2020 · 제50권 제6호Comparison of three different orthodontic wires for bonded lingual retainer fabricationAsli Baysal, Nisa Gul, Sabri Ilhan Ramoglu, Tancan Uysal대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2012 · 제42권 제1호Three-dimensional evaluation of the transfer accuracy of a bracket jig fabricated using computer-aided design and manufacturing to the anterior dentition: An in vitro studyChoi Jin-Young, Kim Seong-Hun, Kim Su-Jung, Lee Kee-Joon, Nelson Gerald, Park Jae-Hyun대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2021 · 제51권 제6호In -vitro investigation of the mechanical friction properties of a computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing lingual bracket system under diverse tooth displacement conditionDo-Yoon Kim, Il-Hyung Yang, Il-Sik Cho, Sang-Woon Ha, Seung-Hak Baek대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2019 · 제49권 제2호Comparison of dimensional accuracy between direct-printed and thermoformed alignersAndrew Hayes, Jin-Young Choi, Julie McCray, Ki Beom Kim, Nickolas Koenig, Patricia Schneider대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2022 · 제52권 제4호Evaluation of the accuracy of a 3D-printed palatal auxiliary device for maxillary protraction after palatal expansionFu Ping Cui, Hwarang Jeong, Jin-Hwan Kim, Jung-Jin Park, Seong-Hun Kim, Sue Yeon Lee대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2025 · 제55권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)