Comparison of retention characteristics of Essix and Hawley retainers
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: We aimed to compare the retention characteristics of Essix and Hawley retainers. Methods: Adolescents undergoing fixed appliance treatment at 2 centers were recruited for this study. Twenty-two patients (16 women and 6 men) wore Essix retainers (Essix group) while 20 (14 women and 6 men) wore Hawley retainers (Hawley group). The mean retention time was 1 year, and the mean follow-up recall time for both groups was 2 years. Two qualified dental examiners evaluated the blind patient data. Maxillary and mandibular dental casts and lateral cephalograms were analyzed at 4 stages: pretreatment (T1), post-treatment (T2), post-retention (T3), and follow-up (T4). Results: The results revealed that Essix appliances were more efficient in retaining the anterior teeth in the mandible during a 1-year retention period. The irregularity index increased in both arches in both groups after a 2-year post-retention period. The mandibular arch lengths increased during treatment and tended to return to their original value after retention in both groups; however, these changes were statistically significant only in the Hawley group. Cephalometric variables did not show any significant differences. Conclusions: The retention characteristics of both Essix and Hawley retainers are similar.
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to compare the retention characteristics of Essix and Hawley retainers. Methods: Adolescents undergoing fixed appliance treatment at 2 centers were recruited for this study. Twenty-two patients (16 women and 6 men) wore Essix retainers (Essix group) while 20 (14 women and 6 men) wore Hawley retainers (Hawley group). The mean retention time was 1 year, and the mean follow-up recall time for both groups was 2 years. Two qualified dental examiners evaluated the blind patient data. Maxillary and mandibular dental casts and lateral cephalograms were analyzed at 4 stages: pretreatment (T1), post-treatment (T2), post-retention (T3), and follow-up (T4). Results: The results revealed that Essix appliances were more efficient in retaining the anterior teeth in the mandible during a 1-year retention period. The irregularity index increased in both arches in both groups after a 2-year post-retention period. The mandibular arch lengths increased during treatment and tended to return to their original value after retention in both groups; however, these changes were statistically significant only in the Hawley group. Cephalometric variables did not show any significant differences. Conclusions: The retention characteristics of both Essix and Hawley retainers are similar.
참고문헌 (30)
- Moyers RE., "Handbook of orthodontics for the student and general practitioner. 3rd ed" (1973), Year Book Medical Publishers
- Hawley CA, "A removable retainer", Int J Orthod Oral Surg, 2, pp.291~298 (1919)
- Sheridan JJ, "Essix retainers: fabrication and supervision for permanent retention", J Clin Orthod, 27, pp.37~45 (1993)
- Proffit WR, "Retention, In Contemporary orthodontics. 2nd ed", pp.617~631 (1993), Mosby Year Book
- Reitan K, "Principles of retention and avoidance of posttreatment relapse", Am J Orthod, 55, pp.776~790 (1969)
- Bearn DR, "Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 108, pp.207~213 (1995)
- Haydar B, "Effects of retainers on the articulation of speech", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 110, pp.535~540 (1996)
- Başçiftçi FA, "Occlusal contacts with different retention procedures in 1-year follow-up period", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 131, pp.357~362 (2007)
- Hichens L, "Cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction: Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers", Eur J Orthod, 29, pp.372~378 (2007)
- Sauget E, "Comparison of occlusal contacts with use of Hawley and clear overlay retainers", Angle Orthod, 67, pp.223~230 (1997)
- Lindauer SJ, "Comparison of Essix and Hawley retainers", J Clin Orthod, 32, pp.95~97 (1998)
- Rowland H, "The effectiveness of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers: a single-center randomized controlled trial", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 132, pp.730~737 (2007)
- Little RM, "The irregularity index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment", Am J Orthod, 68, pp.554~563 (1975)
- Dahlberg G, "Statistical methods for medical and biological students" (1940), Interscience Publications
- Joondeph DR, "Retention and relapse, In Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. 3rd ed", pp.985~1012 (2000), Mosby
- Bayram M, "Mandibular incisor extraction treatment of a class I malocclusion with bolton discrepancy: a case report", Eur J Dent, 1, pp.54~59 (2007)
- Ledvinka J, "Vacuum-formed retainers more effective than Hawley retainers", Evid Based Dent, 10, pp.47~ (2009)
- Barlin S, "A retrospective randomized double-blind comparison study of the effectiveness of Hawley vs vacuum-formed retainers", Angle Orthod, 81, pp.404~409 (2011)
- Taner TU, "Shortterm effects of fiberotomy on relapse of anterior crowding", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 118, pp.617~623 (2000)
- Little RM, "Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment-first premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics", Am J Orthod, 80, pp.349~365 (1981)
- Sadowsky C, "Long-term assessment of orthodontic relapse", Am J Orthod, 82, pp.456~463 (1982)
- Little RM, "An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years postretention", Am J Orothod Dentofacial Orthop, 93, pp.423~428 (1988)
- Shapiro PA, "Mandibular dental arch form and dimension. Treatment and postretention changes", Am J Orthod, 66, pp.58~70 (1974)
- Glenn G, "Nonextraction orthodontic therapy: posttreatment dental and skeletal stability", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 92, pp.321~328 (1987)
- Melrose C, "Toward a perspective on orthodontic retention?", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 113, pp.507~514 (1998)
- Edman Tynelius G, "Evaluation of orthodontic treatment after 1 year of retention--a randomized controlled trial", Eur J Orthod, 32, pp.542~547 (2010)
- Al Yami EA, "Stability of orthodontic treatment outcome: follow-up until 10 years postretention", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 115, pp.300~304 (1999)
- Yavari J, "Relapse in Angle Class II Division 1 Malocclusion treated by tandem mechanics without extraction of permanent teeth: A retrospective analysis", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 118, pp.34~42 (2000)
- Littlewood SJ, "Orthodontic retention: a systematic review", J Orthod, 33, pp.205~212 (2006)
- Atack N, "Which way forward? Fixed or removable lower retainers", Angle Orthod, 77, pp.954~959 (2007)