Risk factors for orthodontic fixed retention failure: A retrospective controlled study
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: To investigate the potential correlation between fixed orthodontic retention failure and several patient- and treatment-related factors. Methods: Patients finishing treatment with fixed appliances between 2016 and 2017 were retrospectively included in this study. Those not showing fixed retention failure were considered as control group. Patients with fixed retention failure were considered as the experimental group. Additionally, patients with failure of fixed retainers in the period of June 2019 to March 2021 were prospectively identified and included in the experimental group. The location of the first retention failure, sex, pretreatment dental occlusion, facial characteristics, posttreatment dental occlusion, treatment approach and presence of oral habits were compared between groups before and after treatment separately by using a Fisher exact test and a Mann–Whitney U test. Results: 206 patients with fixed retention failure were included, 169 in the mandibular and 74 in the maxillary jaws. Significant correlations were observed between retention failure in the mandibular jaws and mandibular arch length discrepancy (P = 0.010), post-treatment growth pattern (P = 0.041), nail biting (P < 0.001) and abnormal tongue function (P = 0.002). Retention failure in the maxillary jaws was more frequent in patients with IPR in the mandibular jaws (P = 0.005) and abnormal tongue function (P = 0.021). Conclusions: This study suggests a correlation between fixed retention failure and parafunctional habits, such as nail biting and abnormal tongue function. Prospective studies with larger study populations could further confirm these results.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the potential correlation between fixed orthodontic retention failure and several patient- and treatment-related factors. Methods: Patients finishing treatment with fixed appliances between 2016 and 2017 were retrospectively included in this study. Those not showing fixed retention failure were considered as control group. Patients with fixed retention failure were considered as the experimental group. Additionally, patients with failure of fixed retainers in the period of June 2019 to March 2021 were prospectively identified and included in the experimental group. The location of the first retention failure, sex, pretreatment dental occlusion, facial characteristics, posttreatment dental occlusion, treatment approach and presence of oral habits were compared between groups before and after treatment separately by using a Fisher exact test and a Mann–Whitney U test. Results: 206 patients with fixed retention failure were included, 169 in the mandibular and 74 in the maxillary jaws. Significant correlations were observed between retention failure in the mandibular jaws and mandibular arch length discrepancy (P = 0.010), post-treatment growth pattern (P = 0.041), nail biting (P < 0.001) and abnormal tongue function (P = 0.002). Retention failure in the maxillary jaws was more frequent in patients with IPR in the mandibular jaws (P = 0.005) and abnormal tongue function (P = 0.021). Conclusions: This study suggests a correlation between fixed retention failure and parafunctional habits, such as nail biting and abnormal tongue function. Prospective studies with larger study populations could further confirm these results.
참고문헌 (25)
- Anna Iliadi, "Failure of fixed orthodontic retainers: A systematic review", Journal of Dentistry, 43(8), pp.876~896 (2015), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Björn U. Zachrisson, "Multistranded wire bonded retainers: From start to success", American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 148(5), pp.724~727 (2015), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Dietmar Segner, "Bonded Retainers – Clinical Reliability", Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics, 2000, pp.61(5), 352~358[DOI]
- Maciej Jedliński, "What causes failure of fixed orthodontic retention? – systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies", Head & Face Medicine, 17(1), pp.32~ (2021), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- T. Taner, "A prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular lingual retainer survival", The European Journal of Orthodontics, 34(4), pp.470~474 (2011), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
- Josef Kučera, "Fixed retention: pitfalls and complications", British Dental Journal, 230(11), pp.703~708 (2021), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Dahl EH, "Long-term experience with direct-bonded lingual retainers", J Clin Orthod, 25, pp.619~630 (1991)[DOI]
- Zachrisson BU, "Long-term experience with directbonded retainers : update and clinical advice", J Clin Orthod, 41, pp.728~737 (2007)
- Allahyar Gerami, "Displacement and force distribution of splinted and tilted mandibular anterior teeth under occlusal loads: an in silico 3D finite element analysis", Progress in Orthodontics, 17(1) (2016), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Gudrun Edman Tynelius, "Five-year postretention outcomes of three retention methods—a randomized controlled trial", The European Journal of Orthodontics, 37(4), pp.345~353 (2014), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
- SJ Littlewood, "Retention and relapse in clinical practice", Australian Dental Journal, 62(S1), pp.51~57 (2017), Wiley[DOI]
- D. J. Lie Sam Foek, "Survival of flexible, braided, bonded stainless steel lingual retainers: a historic cohort study", The European Journal of Orthodontics, 30(2), pp.199~204 (2008), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
- Anna Konermann, "In vivo determination of tooth mobility after fixed orthodontic appliance therapy with a novel intraoral measurement device", Clinical Oral Investigations, 21(4), pp.1283~1289 (2016), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Jan Lindhe, "The Effect of Elimination of Jiggling Forces on Periodontally Exposed Teeth in the Dog", Journal of Periodontology, 53(9), pp.562~567 (1982), Wiley[DOI]
- Timothy J. O'Leary, "The Effect of a “Tube‐Type” Diet and Stress‐Inducing Conditions on Tooth Mobility", The Journal of Periodontology, 38(3), pp.222~226 (1967), Wiley[DOI]
- Posen AL, "The influence of maximum perioral and tongue force on the incisor teeth", Angle Orthod, 42, pp.285~309 (1972)
- Ernest T. Klein, "Pressure habits, etiological factors in malocclusion", American Journal of Orthodontics, 38(8), pp.569~587 (1952), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Cecil C. Steiner, "Cephalometrics for you and me", American Journal of Orthodontics, 39(10), pp.729~755 (1953), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- M. Özcan, "Composite–composite adhesion in dentistry: a systematic review and meta-analysis", Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 28(21), pp.2209~2229 (2014), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Ana Cristina Borges Oliveira, "Factors associated with malocclusions in children and adolescents with Down syndrome", American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 133(4), pp.489.e1~489.e8 (2008), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Padhraig S. Fleming, "Self-etch primers and conventional acid-etch technique for orthodontic bonding: A systematic review and meta-analysis", American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 142(1), pp.83~94 (2012), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Yasemin Kartal, "Fixed Orthodontic Retainers: A Review", Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, 32(02), pp.110~114 (2019), Galenos Yayinevi[DOI]
- Eva Schneider, "Upper bonded retainers", The Angle Orthodontist, 81(6), pp.1050~1056 (2011), The Angle Orthodontist (EH Angle Education & Research Foundation)[DOI]
- Johnsson AC, "Subjective evaluation of orthodontic treatment and potential side effects of bonded lingual retainers", Swed Dent J, 31, pp.35~44 (2007)
- Carrol Jin, "Survival analysis of orthodontic retainers", European Journal of Orthodontics, 40(5), pp.531~536 (2018), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]