본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Mandibular arch orthodontic treatment stability using passive self-ligating and conventional systems in adults: A randomized controlled trial

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Objective: This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the stability of mandibular arch orthodontic treatment outcomes between passive self-ligating and conventional systems during 6 months of retention. Methods: Forty-seven orthodontic patients with mild to moderate crowding malocclusions not requiring extraction were recruited based on inclusion criteria. Patients (mean age 21.58 ± 2.94 years) were randomized into two groups to receive either passive self-ligating (Damon® 3MX, n = 23) or conventional system (Gemini MBT, n = 24) orthodontic treatment. Direct measurements of the final sample comprising 20 study models per group were performed using a digital caliper at the debonding stage, and 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after debonding. Paired t-test, independent t-test, and non-parametric test were used for statistical analysis. Results: A significant increase (p < 0.01) in incisor irregularity was observed in both self-ligating and conventional system groups. A significant reduction (p < 0.01) in second interpremolar width was observed in both groups. Mandibular arch length decreased significantly (p = 0.001) in the conventional system group but not in the self-ligating system group. A similar pattern of stability was observed for intercanine width, first interpremolar width, intermolar width, and arch depth throughout the 6-month retention period after debonding. Comparison of incisor irregularity and arch dimension changes between self-ligating system and conventional system groups during the 6 months were non-significant. Conclusions: The stability of treatment outcomes for mild to moderate crowding malocclusions was similar between the self-ligating system and conventional system during the first 6 months of retention.[Korean J Orthod 2017;47(1):11-20]

Abstract

Objective: This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the stability of mandibular arch orthodontic treatment outcomes between passive self-ligating and conventional systems during 6 months of retention. Methods: Forty-seven orthodontic patients with mild to moderate crowding malocclusions not requiring extraction were recruited based on inclusion criteria. Patients (mean age 21.58 ± 2.94 years) were randomized into two groups to receive either passive self-ligating (Damon® 3MX, n = 23) or conventional system (Gemini MBT, n = 24) orthodontic treatment. Direct measurements of the final sample comprising 20 study models per group were performed using a digital caliper at the debonding stage, and 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after debonding. Paired t-test, independent t-test, and non-parametric test were used for statistical analysis. Results: A significant increase (p < 0.01) in incisor irregularity was observed in both self-ligating and conventional system groups. A significant reduction (p < 0.01) in second interpremolar width was observed in both groups. Mandibular arch length decreased significantly (p = 0.001) in the conventional system group but not in the self-ligating system group. A similar pattern of stability was observed for intercanine width, first interpremolar width, intermolar width, and arch depth throughout the 6-month retention period after debonding. Comparison of incisor irregularity and arch dimension changes between self-ligating system and conventional system groups during the 6 months were non-significant. Conclusions: The stability of treatment outcomes for mild to moderate crowding malocclusions was similar between the self-ligating system and conventional system during the first 6 months of retention.[Korean J Orthod 2017;47(1):11-20]

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Freitas KM, "Postretention relapse of mandibular anterior crowding in patients treated without mandibular premolar extraction", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 125, pp.480~487 (2004)
  2. Melrose C, "Toward a perspective on orthodontic retention?", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 113, pp.507~514 (1998)
  3. Nanda RS, "Considerations of dentofacial growth in long-term retention and stability: is active retention needed?", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 101, pp.297~302 (1992)
  4. Destang DL, "Maxillary retention: is longer better?", Eur J Orthod, 25, pp.65~69 (2003)
  5. Shawesh M, "Hawley retainers full- or part-time? A randomized clinical trial", Eur J Orthod, 32, pp.165~170 (2010)
  6. Sheridan JJ, "Essix retainers:fabrication and supervision for permanent retention", J Clin Orthod, 27, pp.37~45 (1993)
  7. Eliades T, "Selfligation in orthodontics" (2009), Wiley-Blackwell
  8. Damon DH, "The rationale, evolution and clinical application of the self-ligating bracket", Clin Orthod Res, 1, pp.52~61 (1998)
  9. Khambay B, "Evaluation of methods of archwire ligation on frictional resistance", Eur J Orthod, 26, pp.327~332 (2004)
  10. Griffiths HS, "Resistance to sliding with 3 types of elastomeric modules", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 127, pp.670~675 (2005)
  11. Henao SP, "Frictional evaluations of dental typodont models using four self-ligating designs and a conventional design", Angle Orthod, 75, pp.75~85 (2005)
  12. Kim TK, "Comparison of frictional forces during the initial leveling stage in various combinations of self-ligating brackets and archwires with a custom-designed typodont system", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 133, pp.187.e15~187.e24 (2008)
  13. Franchi L, "Maxillary arch changes during leveling and aligning with fixed appliances and low-friction ligatures", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130, pp.88~91 (2006)
  14. Chen SS, "Systematic review of self ligating brackets", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137, pp.726.e1~726.e18 (2010)
  15. Rowland H, "The effectiveness of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers: a single-center randomized controlled trial", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 132, pp.730~737 (2007)
  16. Thickett E, "A randomized clinical trial of thermoplastic retainer wear", Eur J Orthod, 32, pp.1~5 (2010)
  17. Norma Ab Rahman, "A survey on retention practice among orthodontists in Malaysia", 대한치과교정학회지, 46(1), pp.36~41 (2016), 대한치과교정학회
  18. Damon D, "Damon system: The workbook" (2004), Ormco Corporation

관련 논문AI추천

Mandibular changes during initial alignment with SmartClip self-ligating and conventional brackets: A single-center prospective randomized controlled clinical trialDogan Kilkis, Mehmet Bayram, Metin Nur, Mevlut Celikoglu대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2015 · 제45권 제2호Long-term stability of dentoalveolar, skeletal, and soft tissue changes after non-extraction treatment with a self-ligating systemFaruk Ayhan Basciftci, Mehmet Akin, Sinem Bayram, Zehra Ileri대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2014 · 제44권 제3호Randomized controlled clinical trial of oral health-related quality of life in patients wearing conventional and self-ligating bracketsNoorhanizar Mansor, Roslan Saub, Siti Adibah Othman대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2014 · 제44권 제4호Effects of self-ligating brackets and other factors influencing orthodontic treatment outcomes: A prospective cohort studyJung Min-Ho대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2021 · 제51권 제6호Clinical effects of different prescriptions on the inclination of maxillary and mandibular incisors by using passive self-ligating bracketsCorrado Paganelli, Domenico Dalessandri, Fabio Savoldi, Gualtiero Mandelli, Linda Sangalli, Luis T. Huanca Ghislanzoni, Min Gu대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2022 · 제52권 제6호Evaluation of the alignment efficiency of nickeltitanium and copper-nickel-titanium archwires in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment over a 12-week period: A single-center, randomized controlled clinical trialBurcu Aydın, Neslihan Ebru Şenışık, Özgür Koşkan대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2018 · 제48권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)