Comparison between dental and basal arch forms in normal occlusion and Class III malocclusions utilizing cone-beam computed tomography
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the mandibular dental and basal arch forms in subjects with normal occlusion and compare them with those of Class III malocclusion using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: CBCT images of 32 normal occlusion (19 males, 13 females; 24.3 years) and 33 Class III malocclusion subjects (20males, 13 females, 22.2 years) were selected. Facial axis and root center points were identified from the left to right mandibular first molars. Distances between the facial axis and root center points for each tooth were calculated, and 4linear and 2 ratio variables were measured and calculated for each arch form. The variables were compared between groups by independent t-test. Pearson correlation coefficient was applied to assess the relationships between dental and basal variables within each group. Results: The mandibular dental and basal intercanine widths were significantly greater in the Class III group than in normal occlusion subjects (p < 0.05). The dental and basal intercanine widths as well as the dental and basal intermolar widths were strongly correlated in normal occlusion and moderately correlated in Class III malocclusion. Conclusions:The dental arch form demon strated a strong positive correlation with the basal arch form in the normal occlusion group and moderate correlation in the Class III malocclusion group. These results might be helpful for clinicians to have a better understanding of the importance of basal arch form in the alveolar bone.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the mandibular dental and basal arch forms in subjects with normal occlusion and compare them with those of Class III malocclusion using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: CBCT images of 32 normal occlusion (19 males, 13 females; 24.3 years) and 33 Class III malocclusion subjects (20males, 13 females, 22.2 years) were selected. Facial axis and root center points were identified from the left to right mandibular first molars. Distances between the facial axis and root center points for each tooth were calculated, and 4linear and 2 ratio variables were measured and calculated for each arch form. The variables were compared between groups by independent t-test. Pearson correlation coefficient was applied to assess the relationships between dental and basal variables within each group. Results: The mandibular dental and basal intercanine widths were significantly greater in the Class III group than in normal occlusion subjects (p < 0.05). The dental and basal intercanine widths as well as the dental and basal intermolar widths were strongly correlated in normal occlusion and moderately correlated in Class III malocclusion. Conclusions:The dental arch form demon strated a strong positive correlation with the basal arch form in the normal occlusion group and moderate correlation in the Class III malocclusion group. These results might be helpful for clinicians to have a better understanding of the importance of basal arch form in the alveolar bone.
참고문헌 (29)
- Howes AE, "Model analysis for treatment planning: a portion of a symposium on case analysis and treatment planning", Am J Orthod, 38, pp.183~207 (1952)
- Rees DJ, "A method for assessing the proportional relation of apical bases and contact diameters of the teeth", Am J Orthod, 39, pp.695~707 (1953)
- Stevens DR, "Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129, pp.794~803 (2006)
- Quimby ML, "The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models", Angle Orthod, 74, pp.298~303 (2004)
- Ball RL, "Comparison of dental and apical base arch forms in Class II Division 1 and Class I malocclusions", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 138, pp.41~50 (2010)
- Gupta D, "Comparison of the mandibular dental and basal arch forms in adults and children with Class I and Class II malocclusions", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 138, pp.10~18 (2010)
- Ronay V, "Mandibular archform: the relationship between dental and basal anatomy", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 134, pp.430~438 (2008)
- Cha BK, "Soft tissue thickness for placement of an orthodontic miniscrew using an ultrasonic device", Angle Orthod, 78, pp.403~408 (2008)
- Berco M, "Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 136, pp.17~19 (2009)
- Damstra J, "Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam com puted tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137, pp.16.el~16.e11 (2010)
- Tai K, "Preliminary cone-beam computed tomo graphy study evaluating dental and skeletal changes after treatment with a mandibular Schwarz appliance", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 138, pp.262.e1~262.e11 (2010)
- Bayome M, "Evaluation of three-dimensional relationships among skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue variables in normal occlusion sample", 박사, pp.2011
- Kuntz TR, "Arch widths in adults with Class I crowded and Class III malocclusions compared with normal occlusions", Angle Orthod, 78, pp.597~603 (2008)
- Al-Khateeb SN, "Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different maloc-clu sions in a Jordanian sample", Angle Orthod, 76, pp.459~465 (2006)
- Uysal T, "Dental and alveolar arch widths in normal occlusion and Class III malocclusion", Angle Orthod, 75, pp.809~813 (2005)
- Slaj M, "Dental archforms in dentoalveolar Class I, II and III", Angle Orthod, 80, pp.919~924 (2010)
- Braun S, "The form of the human dental arch", Angle Orthod, 68, pp.29~36 (1998)
- Andrews LF, "The six keys to normal occlusion", Am J Orthod, 62, pp.296~309 (1972)
- Andrews LF, "The six elements of orofacial harmony", Andrews J, 1, pp.13~22 (2000)
- Sarikaya S, "Changes in alveolar bone thickness due to retraction of anterior teeth", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 122, pp.15~26 (2002)
- Shelley AM, "Subjective image quality assessment of cross sectional imaging methods for the symphyseal region of the mandible prior to dental implant placement", J Dent, 39, pp.764~770 (2011)
- Howes AE, "A polygon portrayal of coronal and basal arch dimensions in the horizontal plane", Am J Orthod, 40, pp.811~831 (1954)
- Kwang-Yoo Kim, "Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between dental and basal arch forms in normal occlusion", 대한치과교정학회지, 41(4), pp.288~296 (2011), 대한치과교정학회
- Sergl HG, "A method of measuring the apical base", Eur J Orthod, 18, pp.479~483 (1996)
- Ludlow JB, "Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 106, pp.106~114 (2008)
- Scheid RC, "Woelfel’s dental anatomy", pp.2012, Wolters Kluwer Health
- Bayome M, "Comparison of arch forms between Egyptian and North American white populations", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 139, pp.e245~e252 (2011)
- Kook YA, "Comparison of arch forms between Korean and North American white populations", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 126, pp.680~686 (2004)
- Nojima K, "A comparative study of Caucasian and Japanese mandibular clinical arch forms", Angle Orthod, 71, pp.195~200 (2001)