Maxillomandibular arch width differences at estimated centers of resistance: Comparison between normal occlusion and skeletal Class III malocclusion
1
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: To evaluate the differences in maxillomandibular transverse measurements at either the crown or the estimated center of resistance (CR), and to compare values between normal occlusion and Class III malocclusion groups. Methods: Dental casts and computed tomography (CT) data from 30 individuals with normal occlusion and 30 with skeletal Class III malocclusions were evaluated. Using the casts, dental arch widths (DAWs) were measured from the cusp tips, and basal arch widths (BAWs-cast) were measured as the distance between the points at the mucogingival junction adjacent to the respective cusp tips. The BAWs determined from CT (BAWs-CT) images were measured from the estimated CRs of the teeth. Results: None of the DAW measurements or maxillomandibular DAW differences showed statistically significant intergroup differences. In contrast, the maxillary BAWs-CT and BAWs-cast were lesser in the Class III malocclusion group than in the normal occlusion group. The mandibular BAWs-CT were significantly greater in the Class III malocclusion group than in the normal occlusion group. Moreover, the maxillomandibular BAW differences on both CT and cast showed significant intergroup differences in all transverse measurements. Conclusions: The maxillomandibular DAW differences showed no significant intergroup differences. In contrast, the maxillomandibular BAW differences on both CT and cast showed significant intergroup differences in all transverse measurements. The maxillomandibular BAW differences at the estimated CRs, measured using CT or casts, can reveal underlying transverse maxillary basal arch deficiencies in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusions.[Korean J Orthod 2017;47(3):167-175]
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the differences in maxillomandibular transverse measurements at either the crown or the estimated center of resistance (CR), and to compare values between normal occlusion and Class III malocclusion groups. Methods: Dental casts and computed tomography (CT) data from 30 individuals with normal occlusion and 30 with skeletal Class III malocclusions were evaluated. Using the casts, dental arch widths (DAWs) were measured from the cusp tips, and basal arch widths (BAWs-cast) were measured as the distance between the points at the mucogingival junction adjacent to the respective cusp tips. The BAWs determined from CT (BAWs-CT) images were measured from the estimated CRs of the teeth. Results: None of the DAW measurements or maxillomandibular DAW differences showed statistically significant intergroup differences. In contrast, the maxillary BAWs-CT and BAWs-cast were lesser in the Class III malocclusion group than in the normal occlusion group. The mandibular BAWs-CT were significantly greater in the Class III malocclusion group than in the normal occlusion group. Moreover, the maxillomandibular BAW differences on both CT and cast showed significant intergroup differences in all transverse measurements. Conclusions: The maxillomandibular DAW differences showed no significant intergroup differences. In contrast, the maxillomandibular BAW differences on both CT and cast showed significant intergroup differences in all transverse measurements. The maxillomandibular BAW differences at the estimated CRs, measured using CT or casts, can reveal underlying transverse maxillary basal arch deficiencies in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusions.[Korean J Orthod 2017;47(3):167-175]
참고문헌 (30)
- Franchi L, "Transverse maxillary deficiency in Class II and Class III malocclusions: a cephalometric and morphometric study on posteroanterior films", Orthod Craniofac Res, 8, pp.21~28 (2005)
- Proffit WR, "Stability after surgical orthodontic correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. 2. Maxillary advancement", Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 6, pp.71~80 (1991)
- McNamara JA, "Maxillary transverse deficiency", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 117, pp.567~570 (2000)
- Uysal T, "Dental and alveolar arch widths in normal occlusion and Class III malocclusion", Angle Orthod, 75, pp.809~813 (2005)
- Ricketts RM, "Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. The first fifty years", Angle Orthod, 51, pp.115~150 (1981)
- Hesby RM, "Transverse skeletal and dentoalveolar changes during growth", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130, pp.721~731 (2006)
- Leonardi R, "Landmark identification error in posteroanterior cephalometric radiography. A systematic review", Angle Orthod, 78, pp.761~765 (2008)
- Pil-Kyo Jung, "Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography cephalometric measurements using a midsagittal projection and conventional two-dimensional cephalometric measurements", 대한치과교정학회지, 45(6), pp.282~288 (2015), 대한치과교정학회
- Kusayama M, "Relationship between transverse dental anomalies and skeletal asymmetry", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 123, pp.329~337 (2003)
- Tyan S, "Three-dimensional analysis of molar compensation in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular prognathism", Angle Orthod, 86, pp.421~430 (2016)
- Burstone CR, "Deep overbite correction by intrusion", Am J Orthod, 72, pp.1~22 (1977)
- Melsen B, "Intrusion of incisors in adult patients with marginal bone loss", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 96, pp.232~241 (1989)
- Smith RJ, "Mechanics of tooth movement", Am J Orthod, 85, pp.294~307 (1984)
- 조아라, "Finite-element analysis of the center of resistance of the mandibular dentition", 대한치과교정학회지, 47(1), pp.21~30 (2017), 대한치과교정학회
- van Steenbergen E, "Influence of buccal segment size on prevention of side effects from incisor intrusion", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129, pp.658~665 (2006)
- Lee KJ, "Computed tomographic analysis of tooth-bearing alveolar bone for orthodontic miniscrew placement", AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 135(4), pp.486~494 (2009)
- Vanarsdall RL Jr, "Transverse dimension and longterm stability", Semin Orthod, 5, pp.171~180 (1999)
- Burstone CJ, "The biomechanical foundation of clinical orthodontics" (2015), Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc.
- 임미영, "석고 모형, 레이저 스캔 디지털 모형, 콘 빔 CT 영상 간의 모형 분석 계측치 비교", 대한치과교정학회지, 39(1), pp.6~17 (2009), 대한치과교정학회
- Barrett JF, "Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance", Radiographics, 24, pp.1679~1691 (2004)
- Kuntz TR, "Arch widths in adults with Class I crowded and Class III malocclusions compared with normal occlusions", Angle Orthod, 78, pp.597~603 (2008)
- 이해경, "골격성 Ⅲ급 부정교합자의 치열궁 폭경에 관한 연구", 대한치과교정학회지, 32(2), pp.117~127 (2002), 대한치과교정학회
- Masumoto T, "Relationships among facial type, buccolingual molar inclination, and cortical bone thickness of the mandible", Eur J Orthod, 23, pp.15~23 (2001)
- Kyung Eun Suk, "Comparison between dental and basal arch forms in normal occlusion and Class III malocclusions utilizing cone-beam computed tomography", 대한치과교정학회지, 43(1), pp.15~22 (2013), 대한치과교정학회
- Robert WE, "Orthodontics: current principles and techniques", pp.2012, Elsevier
- Proffit WR, "Equilibrium theory revisited: factors influencing position of the teeth", Angle Orthod, 48, pp.175~186 (1978)
- Ovsenik M, "How to push the limits in the transverse dimension? Facial asymmetry, palatal volume and tongue posture in children with unilateral posterior cross bite: a threedimensional evaluation of early treatment", Orthod Fr, 85, pp.139~149 (2014)
- Braun S, "The form of the human dental arch", Angle Orthod, 68, pp.29~36 (1998)
- Choi SH, "Nonsurgical miniscrew-assisted rapid maxillary expansion results in acceptable stability in young adults", Angle Orthod, 86, pp.713~720 (2016)
- Lee KJ, "Miniscrewassisted nonsurgical palatal expansion before orthognathic surgery for a patient with severe mandibular prognathism", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137, pp.830~839 (2010)