Three-dimensional analysis of the positional relationship between the dentition and basal bone region in patients with skeletal Class I and Class II malocclusion with mandibular retrusion
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: This study aimed to determine the maxillary and mandibular basal bone regions and explore the three-dimensional positional relationship between the dentition and basal bone regions in patients with skeletal Class I and Class II malocclusions with mandibular retrusion. Methods: Eighty patients (40 each with Class I and Class II malocclusion) were enrolled. Maxillary and mandibular basal bone regions were determined using cone-beam computed tomography images. To measure the relationship between the dentition and basal bone region, the root position and root inclination were calculated using the coordinates of specific fixed points by a computer program written in Python. Results: In the Class II group, the mandibular anterior teeth inclined more labially (P < 0.05), with their apices positioned closer to the external boundary. The apex of the maxillary anterior root was positioned closer to the external boundary in both groups. Considering the molar region, the maxillary first molars tended to be more lingually inclined in females (P = 0.037), whereas the mandibular first molars were significantly more labially inclined in the Class II group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Mandibular anterior teeth in Class II malocclusion exhibit a compensatory labial inclination trend with the crown and apex relative to the basal bone region when mandibular retrusion occurs. Moreover, as the root apices of the maxillary anterior teeth are much closer to the labial side in Class I and Class II malocclusion, the range of movement at the root apex should be limited to avoid extensive labial movement.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to determine the maxillary and mandibular basal bone regions and explore the three-dimensional positional relationship between the dentition and basal bone regions in patients with skeletal Class I and Class II malocclusions with mandibular retrusion. Methods: Eighty patients (40 each with Class I and Class II malocclusion) were enrolled. Maxillary and mandibular basal bone regions were determined using cone-beam computed tomography images. To measure the relationship between the dentition and basal bone region, the root position and root inclination were calculated using the coordinates of specific fixed points by a computer program written in Python. Results: In the Class II group, the mandibular anterior teeth inclined more labially (P < 0.05), with their apices positioned closer to the external boundary. The apex of the maxillary anterior root was positioned closer to the external boundary in both groups. Considering the molar region, the maxillary first molars tended to be more lingually inclined in females (P = 0.037), whereas the mandibular first molars were significantly more labially inclined in the Class II group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Mandibular anterior teeth in Class II malocclusion exhibit a compensatory labial inclination trend with the crown and apex relative to the basal bone region when mandibular retrusion occurs. Moreover, as the root apices of the maxillary anterior teeth are much closer to the labial side in Class I and Class II malocclusion, the range of movement at the root apex should be limited to avoid extensive labial movement.
참고문헌 (31)
- Son WS, "Comparison of maxillary basal arch forms using the root apex in adult women with different skeletal patterns : a pilot study", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 158, pp.572~578 (2020)[DOI]
- Fu K, "Analysis of dental and basal bone arch form correlations in skeletal Class II malocclusion", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 159, pp.202~209 (2021)
- Figueiredo MA, "Maxillary alveolar bone evaluation following dentoalveolar expansion with clear aligners in adults : a cone-beam computed tomography study", Korean J Orthod, 53, pp.264~275 (2023)[DOI]
- Yassir YA, "Orthodontic treatment and root resorption : an overview of systematic reviews", Eur J Orthod, 43, pp.442~456 (2021)[DOI]
- Andrews LF, "The six elements of orofacial harmony", Andrews J, 1, pp.13~22 (2000)
- Cha BK, "Soft tissue thickness for placement of an orthodontic miniscrew using an ultrasonic device", Angle Orthod, 78, pp.403~408 (2008)[DOI]
- Hwang S, "Three-dimensional evaluation of dentofacial transverse widths of adults with various vertical facial patterns", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 153, pp.692~700 (2018)[DOI]
- Rees DJ, "A method for assessing the proportional relation of apical bases and contact diameters of the teeth", Am J Orthod, 39, pp.695~707 (1953)[DOI]
- Al-Hilal LH, "An evaluation of mandibular dental and basal arch dimensions in class I and class II division 1 adult Syrian patients using cone-beam computed tomography", J Contemp Dent Pract, 19, pp.431~437 (2018)[DOI]
- Lundstrom AF, "Malocclusion of the teeth regarded as a problem in connection with the apical base", Int J Orthod Oral Surg Radiogr, 11, pp.1109~1133 (1925)[DOI]
- Berco M, "Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 136, pp.17~ (2009)
- Damstra J, "Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137, pp.16~ (2010)
- Crossley AM, "Is there a relationship between dental crowding and the size of the maxillary or mandibular apical base?", Angle Orthod, 90, pp.216~223 (2020)[DOI]
- Braun S, "The form of the human dental arch", Angle Orthod, 68, pp.29~36 (1998)
- Arriola-Guillén LE, "Molar heights and incisor inclinations in adults with Class II and Class III skeletal open-bite malocclusions", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 145, pp.325~332 (2014)[DOI]
- Puttaravuttiporn P, "Volumetric evaluation of root resorption on the upper incisors using cone beam computed tomography after 1 year of orthodontic treatment in adult patients with marginal bone loss", Angle Orthod, 88, pp.710~718 (2018)[DOI]
- Andrews WA, "Incisor position and alveolar bone thickness", Angle Orthod, 92, pp.3~10 (2022)[DOI]
- Kim YE, "Transition of molar relationships in different skeletal growth patterns", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 121, pp.280~290 (2002)[DOI]
- Gracco A, "Upper incisor position and bony support in untreated patients as seen on CBCT", Angle Orthod, 79, pp.692~702 (2009)[DOI]
- Nahás-Scocate AC, "Bone tissue amount related to upper incisors inclination", Angle Orthod, 84, pp.279~285 (2014)[DOI]
- Tian YL, "Alveolar bone thickness around maxillary central incisors of different inclination assessed with cone-beam computed tomography", Korean J Orthod, 45, pp.245~252 (2015)[DOI]
- Coşkun İ, "Relationship between alveolar bone thickness, tooth root morphology, and sagittal skeletal pattern : a cone beam computed tomography study", J Orofac Orthop, 80, pp.144~158 (2019)[DOI]
- Andrews LF, "The six keys to normal occlusion", Am J Orthod, 62, pp.296~309 (1972)[DOI]
- Hwang S, "Posterior dental compensation and occlusal function in adults with different sagittal skeletal malocclusions", Korean J Orthod, 50, pp.98~107 (2020)[DOI]
- Mendes TS, "Three-dimensional analysis of posterior tooth inclinations in transverse and sagittal relationships : a cross-sectional study", Int Orthod, 22, pp.100824~ (2024)[DOI]
- Kotarska M, "Changes in the mandible following rapid maxillary expansion in children with class ii malocclusion : a systematic review", Diagnostics(Basel), 12, pp.1688~ (2022)[DOI]
- Zelderloo A, "Cephalometric appraisal of Class II treatment effects after functional and fixed appliances : a retrospective study", Eur J Orthod, 39, pp.334~341 (2017)[DOI]
- Forster CM, "Relationship between dental arch width and vertical facial morphology in untreated adults", Eur J Orthod, 30, pp.288~294 (2008)[DOI]
- Usui T, "Change in maximum occlusal force in association with maxillofacial growth", Orthod Craniofac Res, 10, pp.226~234 (2007)[DOI]
- Lee SJ, "Method to classify dental arch forms", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 140, pp.87~96 (2011)[DOI]
- Hasegawa Y, "Comparison of mesiodistal tooth crown diameters and arch dimensions between modern Mongolians and Japanese", Odontology, 102, pp.167~175 (2014)[DOI]