3-Dimensional analysis for class III malocclusion patients with facial asymmetry
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: The aim of this study is to investigate the correlation between 2-dimensional (2D) cephalometric measurement and 3-dimensional (3D) cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurement, and to evaluate the availability of 3D analysis for asymmetry patients. Materials and Methods: A total of Twenty-seven patients were evaluated for facial asymmetry by photograph and cephalometric radiograph, and CBCT. The 14 measurements values were evaluated and those for 2D and 3D were compared. The patients were classified into two groups. Patients in group 1 were evaluated for symmetry in the middle 1/3 of the face and asymmetry in the lower 1/3 of the face, and those in group 2 for asymmetry of both the middle and lower 1/3 of the face. Results: In group 1, significant differences were observed in nine values out of 14 values. Values included three from anteroposterior cephalometric radiograph measurement values (cant and both body height) and six from lateral cephalometric radiographs (both ramus length, both lateral ramal inclination, and both gonial angles). In group 2, comparison between 2D and 3D showed significant difference in 10 factors. Values included four from anteroposterior cephalometric radiograph measurement values (both maxillary height, both body height) and six from lateral cephalometric radiographs (both ramus length, both lateral ramal inclination, and both gonial angles). Conclusion: Information from 2D analysis was inaccurate in several measurements. Therefore, in asymmetry patients, 3D analysis is useful in diagnosis of asymmetry.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study is to investigate the correlation between 2-dimensional (2D) cephalometric measurement and 3-dimensional (3D) cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurement, and to evaluate the availability of 3D analysis for asymmetry patients. Materials and Methods: A total of Twenty-seven patients were evaluated for facial asymmetry by photograph and cephalometric radiograph, and CBCT. The 14 measurements values were evaluated and those for 2D and 3D were compared. The patients were classified into two groups. Patients in group 1 were evaluated for symmetry in the middle 1/3 of the face and asymmetry in the lower 1/3 of the face, and those in group 2 for asymmetry of both the middle and lower 1/3 of the face. Results: In group 1, significant differences were observed in nine values out of 14 values. Values included three from anteroposterior cephalometric radiograph measurement values (cant and both body height) and six from lateral cephalometric radiographs (both ramus length, both lateral ramal inclination, and both gonial angles). In group 2, comparison between 2D and 3D showed significant difference in 10 factors. Values included four from anteroposterior cephalometric radiograph measurement values (both maxillary height, both body height) and six from lateral cephalometric radiographs (both ramus length, both lateral ramal inclination, and both gonial angles). Conclusion: Information from 2D analysis was inaccurate in several measurements. Therefore, in asymmetry patients, 3D analysis is useful in diagnosis of asymmetry.
참고문헌 (30)
- Fukushima K, "Morphological characteristics of patients with jaw deformity -Frontal cepharometric evaluation of facial symmetry-", Meikai Univ Dent J, 32, pp.118~123 (2003)
- Tani M, "Posterior-anterior cephalometric analysis in patients with dentofacial deformities", J Jpn Stomatol Soc, 35, pp.1749~1759 (1989)
- Severt TR, "The prevalence of facial asymmetry in the dentofacial deformities population at the University of North Carolina", Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 12, pp.171~176 (1997)
- Samman N, "Analysis of 300 dentofacial deformities in Hong Kong", Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 7, pp.181~185 (1992)
- Sassouni V, "Diagnosis and treatment planning via roentgenographic cephalometry", Am J Orthodontics, 44, pp.433~463 (1958)
- Ricketts RM, "Cephalometric synthesis", Am J Orthod, 46, pp.647~673 (1960)
- Mulick JF, "Clinical use of the frontal headfilm", Angle Orthod, 35, pp.299~304 (1965)
- Graber TM, "New horizons in case analysis-clinical cephalometrics", Am J Orthodont, 38, pp.603~624 (1952)
- Graber TM, "A critical review of clinical cephalometric radiography", Am J Orthodont, 40, pp.1~26 (1954)
- Keen RR, "Osteochondroma of the mandibular condyle: report of case", J Oral Surg, 35, pp.140~143 (1977)
- Gateno J, "Effect of facial asymmetry on 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional cephalometric measurements", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 69, pp.655~662 (2011)
- Trpkova B, "Assessment of facial asymmetries from posteroanterior cephalograms: validity of reference lines", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 123, pp.512~520 (2003)
- Kawamata A, "Three-dimensional computed tomography imaging in dentistry", Dent Clin North Am, 44, pp.395~410 (2000)
- Kawamata A, "Three-dimensional computed tomographic evaluation of morphologic airway changes after mandibular setback osteotomy for prognathism", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 89, pp.278~287 (2000)
- Haraguchi S, "Facial asymmetry in subjects with skeletal Class III deformity", Angle Orthod, 72, pp.28~35 (2002)
- Cheney EA, "Dentofacial asymmetries and their clinical significance", Am J Orthod, 47, pp.814~829 (1961)
- Greiner M, "Variance of landmarks in digital evaluations: comparison between CT-based and conventional digital lateral cephalometric radiographs", J Orofac Orthop, 68, pp.290~298 (2007)
- Silling G, "The significance of cephalometrics in treatment planning", Angle Orthod, 49, pp.259~262 (1979)
- Nijkamp PG, "The influence of cephalometrics on orthodontic treatment planning", Eur J Orthod, 30, pp.630~635 (2008)
- Turpin DL, "British Orthodontic Society revises guidelines for clinical radiography", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 134, pp.597~598 (2008)
- Houston WJ, "The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements", Am J Orthod, 83, pp.382~390 (1983)
- van Vlijmen OJ, "A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls", Eur J Oral Sci, 117, pp.300~305 (2009)
- van Vlijmen OJ, "Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans and conventional radiographs", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 67, pp.92~97 (2009)
- Yitschaky O, "Comparison of common hard tissue cephalometric measurements between computed tomography 3D reconstruction and conventional 2D cephalometric images", Angle Orthod, 81, pp.11~16 (2011)
- Hwang HS, "Maxillofacial 3-dimensional image analysis for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130, pp.779~785 (2006)
- Gateno J, "New 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 69, pp.606~622 (2011)
- Damstra J, "Evaluation and comparison of postero-anterior cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomography images for the detection of mandibular asymmetry", Eur J Orthod, 35, pp.45~50 (2013)
- Yoon YJ, "Effect of head rotation on lateral cephalometric radiographs", Angle Orthod, 71, pp.396~403 (2001)
- van Vlijmen OJ, "A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 39, pp.156~160 (2010)
- 황현식, "Th ree-dimensional soft tissue analysis for the evaluation of facial asymmetry in normal occlusion individuals", 대한치과교정학회지, 42(2), pp.56~63 (2012), 대한치과교정학회