춤의 언어적 의미기능에 관한 해석 연구
Interpretative Study on Linguistic & Semantic Functions of Dance
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study tries to read the dance in view of a sign/symbol centered on its linguistic functions and semantics. While dance is the representative form of a nonverbal-nonvocal body language, it has its distinctiveness from other languages as an artistic phenomenon. It thus exists as an abbreviation or a symbolic language as if it is an old practice lasted for a long time. For the perspective that regards the artistic phenomenon of the dance as the linguistic function, it makes a fairly linguistic interpretation on the factors that make the dance be expressed in an oral language. In this case, the cultural common notion that reads the dance through its symbolic signs and meanings as the body language as well as the abbreviation shared in the form of dance texts. Furthermore, the concept of ‘symbolic signs,’ where the language organizes an artistic phenomenon, is described as the and symbolic activity by regarding the art as a compound unit that helps to head for the symbolic world. In order to analyze the world of art, intertwined with such concepts and elements, in light of linguistic interpretation, it applies the methodology called semiotic customization. While the study narrows the perspectives on the general art, it discloses the problems the dance language has; and it makes an inference grounded on the interpretative study associated to the artistic phenomenon. Therefore, the application of the dance text should be treated as the methodology of the linguistic-scientific interpretation, along with the aesthetic/artistic & technological analysis. Likewise, the truths in life and artistic message the dance art has traditionally depicted as well as its concept that becomes a social myth are needed to be inferred as well.
Abstract
This study tries to read the dance in view of a sign/symbol centered on its linguistic functions and semantics. While dance is the representative form of a nonverbal-nonvocal body language, it has its distinctiveness from other languages as an artistic phenomenon. It thus exists as an abbreviation or a symbolic language as if it is an old practice lasted for a long time. For the perspective that regards the artistic phenomenon of the dance as the linguistic function, it makes a fairly linguistic interpretation on the factors that make the dance be expressed in an oral language. In this case, the cultural common notion that reads the dance through its symbolic signs and meanings as the body language as well as the abbreviation shared in the form of dance texts. Furthermore, the concept of ‘symbolic signs,’ where the language organizes an artistic phenomenon, is described as the and symbolic activity by regarding the art as a compound unit that helps to head for the symbolic world. In order to analyze the world of art, intertwined with such concepts and elements, in light of linguistic interpretation, it applies the methodology called semiotic customization. While the study narrows the perspectives on the general art, it discloses the problems the dance language has; and it makes an inference grounded on the interpretative study associated to the artistic phenomenon. Therefore, the application of the dance text should be treated as the methodology of the linguistic-scientific interpretation, along with the aesthetic/artistic & technological analysis. Likewise, the truths in life and artistic message the dance art has traditionally depicted as well as its concept that becomes a social myth are needed to be inferred as well.
참고문헌 (17)
- 고바야시 신지, "무용미학" (2000), 현대미학사
- 김말복, "무용예술론" (1987), 금강
- 김영순, "신체언어 커뮤니케이션의 기호학" (2001), 커뮤니케이션 북스
- 김지원, "니이체의 ‘永遠回歸’에서 본 살풀이춤의 表象에 관한 연구", 9 (2002), 한국미래춤학회
- 김지원, "한국춤의 코드와 해석" (2006), 한양대학교 출판부
- 데이비드 베스트, "움직임 예술에 있어서 표현" (1995), 현대미학사
- 박이문, "기호의 해석-의미의 현상학", 기호학 연구, 4 (1998)
- 이기우, "예술기호론의 최근 동향의 연구", 국어문학, 27 (1989), 전북 국어 문학회
- 이수정, "예술에서의 언어적 실천", 석사, pp.2001
- 자넷 애드쉐드, "무용 분석의 이론과 실제" (1996), 현대미학사
- 폴 발레리, "신체의 미학" (1997), 현대미학사
- 한국기호학회, "몸짓언어와 기호학" (2001), 문학과 지성사
- Jiři Veltruský, "(trans),Man and Object in the Theater" (1964), In Garvin
- L. Wittgenstein, "철학적 탐구" (1994), 서광사
- S.K. Langer, "Feeling and Form" (1953), Scribner
- S.K. Langer, "Problems of Art" (1957), Charles Scribner's Sons
- Winfried Nöth, "Handbook of Semiotics" (1990), Bloomington: Indiana Univ
