본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

무용언어의 기표, 기의 간극의 표현을 위한 연구방법론 고찰

A study on the methodology to express the gap between significant and signifié of the dance vocabulary

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류무용

초록

As dance is an instrument of expressing one’s emotion, it exists almost every society in various forms. It is also an aesthetic art form to allow to feel and express emotion of which more magnificent range than when it is in everyday life. Dance is able to deliver various and rich feeling because it expresses and stimulates emotion with human body through perception of multiple senses, but it is hardly explained with one definite word. Dancer shows the intention through the movement, which is consist of her/his inner experience and the audience sees the long process of dancer’s embodiment even though it is covered by codified movements. Therefore, this study begins with interrogation of how well interpret the expression intention which involves dancer’s inner experience that cannot explain with clear words and moreover, how to document such a subjective feeling and experience with socialised objective language in dance study. Dance reveals aspecific process within semiotic because its image through which enculturated human movement, pervades with social and cultural codes. Therefore, this study analyses the relationship between language and dance using associated with semiotics in that dance posits the exterior movement as signifiant and its interior embodied long process as signifié. This study aims to discuss the potential of various dance studies with suggestion of proper methodology to argue dancer’s indefinite inner experience to reveal semiotic function of dance. This study considers that Firstly, to analyse how dancer and audience communicate, it discusses kinesthetic empathy throughout a dance performance. Secondly, dance movement as significant, it depicts the notion of truth in the text, which dance study uses, to explore proper methodology based on the criterion of the postmodernism through its epistemology and ontology. Finally, it explains the destruction of hypothetic binary within the relationship of dancer and audience to proposes methodologies to deliver dancer’s a sort of signifiéspace and its value to document with seemingly objective texts.

Abstract

As dance is an instrument of expressing one’s emotion, it exists almost every society in various forms. It is also an aesthetic art form to allow to feel and express emotion of which more magnificent range than when it is in everyday life. Dance is able to deliver various and rich feeling because it expresses and stimulates emotion with human body through perception of multiple senses, but it is hardly explained with one definite word. Dancer shows the intention through the movement, which is consist of her/his inner experience and the audience sees the long process of dancer’s embodiment even though it is covered by codified movements. Therefore, this study begins with interrogation of how well interpret the expression intention which involves dancer’s inner experience that cannot explain with clear words and moreover, how to document such a subjective feeling and experience with socialised objective language in dance study. Dance reveals aspecific process within semiotic because its image through which enculturated human movement, pervades with social and cultural codes. Therefore, this study analyses the relationship between language and dance using associated with semiotics in that dance posits the exterior movement as signifiant and its interior embodied long process as signifié. This study aims to discuss the potential of various dance studies with suggestion of proper methodology to argue dancer’s indefinite inner experience to reveal semiotic function of dance. This study considers that Firstly, to analyse how dancer and audience communicate, it discusses kinesthetic empathy throughout a dance performance. Secondly, dance movement as significant, it depicts the notion of truth in the text, which dance study uses, to explore proper methodology based on the criterion of the postmodernism through its epistemology and ontology. Finally, it explains the destruction of hypothetic binary within the relationship of dancer and audience to proposes methodologies to deliver dancer’s a sort of signifiéspace and its value to document with seemingly objective texts.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Aboo Backer, M., "Semiotics: Signs and Meaning in Contemporary Dance in Malaysia", Journal of Arts Discourse, (6), pp.71~76 (2007)
  2. Berger, J., "Here is Where We Meet: A Season in London" (2005), Attevents
  3. Blanariy, N., "Towards a Framework of a Semiotics of Dance", CLCWeb:Comparative Literature and Culture, 15(1), pp.1~10 (2013)
  4. Damasio, A., "The Feeling of What Happens: Body, Emotion and Making of Consciousness" (1999), Vintage
  5. Denzin. K., "Interpretive Autoethnography" (2014), SAGE Publications. Inc
  6. Eco, U., "구조의 부재" (1998), 열린책들
  7. Eco, U., "예술과 광고" (2009), 열린책들
  8. Eco, U., "해석의 한계" (1995), 열린책들
  9. Eco, U., "언어와 광기" (2009), 열린책들
  10. Ellis, C., "The Ethnographic I: A Methodological Novel about Autoethnography" (2004), AltaMira Press
  11. Foster, S., "Choreographic Empathy, Kinesthesia in Performance" (2011), Routledge
  12. Foucault, M., "Politics, Philosophy, Culture and Other Writings 1977-1984" (1988), Routledge
  13. Freeman, J., "Blood, Sweat & Theory" (2010), Libri Publishing
  14. Gallagher, S., "How the body shapes the mind" (2005), Oxford
  15. Gieser, T., "Embodiment, Emotion and Empathy: A Phenomenological Approach to Apprenticeship Learning", Anthropological Theory, 8(3), pp.299~318 (2008)
  16. Hana, J. L., "Dancing to Learn" (2015), Rowman & Littlefield
  17. Hanstein, P., "Educating for the Future – A Post-modern Paradigm for Dance Education", Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 61(5), pp.56~58 (1990)
  18. Holt, N., "Representation, Legitimation, and Autoethngraphy: An Autoethnographic Writing Story", International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(1) (2003)
  19. Jones, J., "Performing Ethnography: The Role of Embodiment in Cultural Authenticity", Theatre Topics, 12(1), pp.1~15 (2002)
  20. Kavale, S., "The Qualitative Inquiry Reader" (2004), Sage Publications
  21. "Words Fail Me: Dancing with the Other’s Familiar, International Gathering (6-10)" (2005)[URL]
  22. Merleau-Ponty. M, "Phenomenology of Perception" (2005), Taylor and Francis e-Library
  23. Mock, R., "Pedagogies of Theatre (Arts) and Performance (Studies)", Studies in Theatre and Performance, 25(3), pp.201~214 (2005)
  24. Phelan, P., "Unmarked: The Politics of Performance" (1993), Routledge
  25. Richardson, L., "New Writing Practices in Qualitative Research", Sociology of Sport Journal, 17(1), pp.5~20 (2000)
  26. Shapiro, A., "“How Including Prior Knowledge as a Subject Variable May Change Outcomes of Learning Research", American Educational Research Journal, 41(1), pp.159~189 (2004)
  27. Spry, T., "Emergent Methods in Social Research" (2006), Sage
  28. Welton., M., "Against Inclusivity: A Happy Heresy about Theory and Practice", New Theatre Quartely, 19(4), pp.347~351 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)