문항반응이론(IRT)을 적용한즉흥무용 평가척도 개발 및 적합도 분석
Constructing the Scale of Improvisational Dance andAnalyzing Goodness-of-fit using Item Response Theory
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to construct the valid scale of improvisational dance, and analyze goodness-of-fit using IRT(Item Response Theory). The professors studying improvisational dance constructed the scale in content validity. The scale constructed as the evidence based on content was 35 items. This study was analyzed in 6 facets(gender, position, major, experience, career, and item) by using Facets program (Linacre, 2000) for the goodness-of-fit. As a result, the gender facet was appraised male has more stern than female when assessing the improvisational dance. The position facet was appraised the high position, professor is more charitable than others. The major facet was appraised the modern dance is more stern than others, ballet and korean dance. The experience facet evaluated of improvisational dance was appraised that the no experience is more stern than the experience. The career facet is also appraised that examinees who have 30-40 years career have more benign than others. Among the 35 items constructed as the evidence based on content in this study, 34, 28, 29, 18, 27 have high logit meaning important items, and 32, 20, 23, 6, 1 were adopted as unimportant items. As significant goodness-of-fit index, 12, 31, and 35 items were not suitable in this study.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to construct the valid scale of improvisational dance, and analyze goodness-of-fit using IRT(Item Response Theory). The professors studying improvisational dance constructed the scale in content validity. The scale constructed as the evidence based on content was 35 items. This study was analyzed in 6 facets(gender, position, major, experience, career, and item) by using Facets program (Linacre, 2000) for the goodness-of-fit. As a result, the gender facet was appraised male has more stern than female when assessing the improvisational dance. The position facet was appraised the high position, professor is more charitable than others. The major facet was appraised the modern dance is more stern than others, ballet and korean dance. The experience facet evaluated of improvisational dance was appraised that the no experience is more stern than the experience. The career facet is also appraised that examinees who have 30-40 years career have more benign than others. Among the 35 items constructed as the evidence based on content in this study, 34, 28, 29, 18, 27 have high logit meaning important items, and 32, 20, 23, 6, 1 were adopted as unimportant items. As significant goodness-of-fit index, 12, 31, and 35 items were not suitable in this study.
참고문헌 (26)
- 강상조, "체조 심판판정의 공정성", 한국체육학회지, 38(2), pp.222~234 (1999)
- 김복선, "발레 연기력 평정척도의 적합도", 박사, pp.2003
- 맹연미, "창의력과 무용창작능력 향상을 위한 즉흥무용 프로그램", 한국무용교육학회지, 13(1), pp.7~134 (2002), 한국무용교육학회
- 성태제, "문항반응이론 입문" (1991), 양서원
- 장선희, "포스트모던댄스에서 나타나는 가벼움", 한국스포츠무용철학회, 3(1), pp.215~232 (1995)
- 지은림, "Rasch 모형의 이론과 실제" (2000), 교육과학사
- 지은림, "문항반응이론을 적용한 정보화마인드 척도 개발 및 초중등 학생의 수준평가", 교육공학연구학회지, 19(1), pp.111~130 (2003)
- 최윤선, "즉흥을 통한 창의적 동작", 대한무용학회지, 16(5), pp.224~231 (1994)
- 최윤선, "현대무용 연기평정을 위한 척도개발" (1998), 한국체육학회 하계세미나
- 최윤선, "심사자의 엄격성과 전공유형이 무용 연기력 판정에 미치는 효과", 박사
- 한혜리, "추어내는 춤 뒤에 보이지 않는 정신", 월간 문화예술, (5) (1997)
- Ashton, D., "A gross motor rhythm test", Research Quarterly, 24, pp.253~260 (1953)
- Chatfield, S.J., "Correlational analysis of aesthetic competency, skill acquisition and physiologic capabilities of modern dancers", Paper presented at 5th Hong Kong International Dance Conference (1990)
- Bakeman, R., "Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis" (1986), Cambridge University Press
- Cohen, J., "A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales", Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, pp.37~46 (1960)
- Hambleton, R.K., "Item Response Theory:Principles and Applications" (1984), Kluwer, Nijhoff
- Harris, J.A., "Dance a while: Handbooks of folk, square, contra, and social dance (6th ed.)" (1988), Macmillan
- Krasnow, D.H., "Imagery and conditioning practices for dancers", Dance Research Journal, 29, pp.43~64 (1997)
- , 1994, ~, pp.MESA Press
- Looney, M.A., "Validity and generalizability of social dance erformance ratings", Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sports, 62, pp.399~405
- Lunz, M.E., "Measuring the impact of judge severity of examination scores", Applied Measurement in Education, 3, pp.331~345 (1990)
- Morris, "Moving Words: Re-Writing Dance", London and New York Routledge (1996)
- Stahl, J.A., "Judge performance reports: Media and message", Objective measurement: Theory into practice, 3, pp.113~125 (1996), Norwood, NJ: Ablex
- Waglow, I.F., "An experiment in social dance testing", Research Quarterly, 24, pp.97~101 (1953)
- Wright, B.D., "Rating scale analysis" (1982), MESA
- Wright, B.D., "Rating scale analysis: Rasch measurement" (1982), MESA Press