사회운동론의 관점에서 본 민주화 운동의 성공: 멕시코 68 민주화 운동과 5·18 민주화 운동을 중심으로
Social Movements Theory and the Success of Democratization Movements: A Comparative Analysis of the Mexico 68 Democratization Movement and the 5·18 Democratization Movement of Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper provides a theoretical tool to evaluate the success or failure of democratization movements from the perspectives of social movement theory. It reviews existing theoretical criteria and typologies for the success of social movements, and it attempts to provide a new approach by going back to the theoretical definition of social movements and their purposes. This endeavor allows the author to propose that the goal of democratization movements is the transformation of authoritarian power relations between the State and civil society. This paper also argues that the extent to which a democratization movement contributes to overcome such relations should be the indicator of success of a movement. To test the argument, this paper examines the Mexico 68 democratization movement and the 5·18 democratization movement of Korea. As a result, it becomes evident that despite apparent similarities as failed democratization movements violently repressed by the State, the two movements differ greatly in terms of their contribution to the further transformation of power relations between the State and civil society. In sum, this study provides a valuable theoretical tool to systematically measure the outcome of democratization movements and deepens our understanding of the two important democratization movements in Mexico and Korea.
Abstract
This paper provides a theoretical tool to evaluate the success or failure of democratization movements from the perspectives of social movement theory. It reviews existing theoretical criteria and typologies for the success of social movements, and it attempts to provide a new approach by going back to the theoretical definition of social movements and their purposes. This endeavor allows the author to propose that the goal of democratization movements is the transformation of authoritarian power relations between the State and civil society. This paper also argues that the extent to which a democratization movement contributes to overcome such relations should be the indicator of success of a movement. To test the argument, this paper examines the Mexico 68 democratization movement and the 5·18 democratization movement of Korea. As a result, it becomes evident that despite apparent similarities as failed democratization movements violently repressed by the State, the two movements differ greatly in terms of their contribution to the further transformation of power relations between the State and civil society. In sum, this study provides a valuable theoretical tool to systematically measure the outcome of democratization movements and deepens our understanding of the two important democratization movements in Mexico and Korea.
참고문헌 (40)
- Allier-Montaño, E., "Memory and History of Mexico"68. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies", Revista Europea de Estudios Latinoamericanos y del Caribe, 102, pp.7~25 (2016)
- Ahn, Jong-chul, "5·18 Yeoksa Wegokwa Unrunui Yeokhal”(Distortion of 5·18 History and Its Role of Media)", Simposuim on 5·18 Democratization Movements 30st Anniversary, pp.3~17 (2015)
- Burstein, P., "the Politics of Social Protest; Comparative Perspectives on States and Social Movements" (1995), UCL Press
- Choi, Won-Kyu, "Hankookui Jeongchiwa Kookka : Kwonwhijuuicheje Sunglipui Jeongchikyeongjehakjeok Bunseok : Yooshin Chejeui Gyeonwoo(Policis and the State in Korea : Political Economy of Establishment of Authoritarian System-Focusing on Yooshin Regime)", Hankookkwa Kookjejeongchi, 4(1), pp.97~176 (1988)
- Cohen, D., "You Can’t Always Get What You Want : Mexico ’68 and the Winter of Revolutionary Discontent", American Historical Review, 123(3), pp.739~743 (2018)
- 정태일, "1980년대 한국의 민주화운동과 정치구조의 변화", 한국동북아논총, 17(2), pp.189~208 (2012), 한국동북아학회[DOI]
- Flaherty, G., "Hotel Mexico: Dwelling on the ’68 Movement" (2016), University of California Press
- Gamson, W., "The Strategy of Social Protest" (1990), Wadsworth Pub
- Giugni, M., "Was it Worth the Effort? The Outcomes and Consequences of Social Movements", Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), pp.371~393 (1998)
- Haiven, M., "Between Success and Failure : Dwelling with Social Movements in the Hiatus", Interface, 5(2), pp.472~498 (2013)
- Hunter, R. J., "Solidarity(Solidarność)at Forty : Memories and Influences on Contemporary Poland ―Does Solidarity Still Matter?", European Journal of Business and Management, 11, pp.97~112 (2019)
- Jee, Byung-Moon, "May Movement of Kwangju for the Transformation of Urban Structure", Korean Political Science Review, 34(4), pp.179~198 (2001)
- 김희송, "1980년 5월 광주공동체의 의미와 현재화에 대한 고찰", 신학전망, (190), pp.62~96 (2015), 신학연구소
- 김윤경, "멕시코의 68운동 -권위주의에 대한 저항-", 서양사론, (138), pp.38~65 (2018), 한국서양사학회
- Kim, Young-Tae, "The Process of Democratic Consolidation in Korea", The Joournal of Social Science, 13(1), pp.237~285 (2006)
- Korkut, Umut, "The Relationship between Democratization and Invigoration of Civil Society : The Case of Hungary and Poland", East European Quarterly, 39(2), pp.149~177 (2005)
- Lee, Byung-Chun, "Baljeonkookkachejewa Baljeon Dillema: Kookkajuuijeok Baljeondongwonchejeui Jejomyung(Developmentalist System and Dilemma of Development: Reevaluation of State-centered Developmentalism)", Kyeongje Sahak(History of Economy), 28, pp.105~138 (2000)
- 임현진, "비교발전 경험에서 본 박정희의 유신체제(1) －중남미 경험에 비춘 역학과 모순－", 세계지역연구논총, 23(2), pp.269~302 (2005), 한국세계지역학회
- McAdam, D., "Handbook of Sociology" (1988), Sage Publications, Inc.
- 노영기, "총을 든 시민들, 시민군", 역사비평, (107), pp.253~279 (2014), 역사문제연구소
- 노영기, "5·18 항쟁의 배경과 참여세력 –광주 지역 민주화운동세력을 중심으로–", 역사와 현실, (89), pp.343~377 (2013), 한국역사연구회
- Paley, Julia, "Marketing Democracy : Power and Social Movements in Post-Dictatorship Chile" (2001), University of California Press
- Park, Yong-Il, "6 Wol Hangjaeng, Jeolbaneui Sungkong(Struggle of June, Incomplete success)", Naeileul Yeonun Yeoksa(History Which Opens up the Future), 33, pp.85~99 (2008)
- Pensado, J., "Rebel Mexico Student Unrest and Authoritarian Political Culture during the Long Sixties Stanford" (2013), Stanford University Press
- Quezada, S., "Neither Truth nor Justice : Mexico"s De Facto Amnesty", Latin American Perspectives, 33(2), pp.56~68 (2006)
- Russell, P., "The History of Mexico : From Pre-Conquest to Presen" (2011), Routledge
- Snow, D., "The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements" (2004), Blackwell Pub
- Weber, Max., "Economy and Society : An Outline of Interpretive Sociology" (1968), Bedminster Press
- 윤선자, "‘5？18’광주항쟁과 1980～1990년대 한국 민주화운동", 민주주의와 인권, 5(2), pp.79~110 (2005), 5.18연구소
- "5·18 Democratization Movement Foundation"[URL]
- "Se agudiza desconfianza en partidos políticos" (2020)[URL]
- "Moon Jae In Gaeheonhan Balui: 6gaji Jaengjeom Jeongri(6 Main Points of President Moon Jae In’s Constitutional Reform Bill)" (2018)[URL]
- "Officially Unofficial: The Evolution of Mexico’s Student Protests" (2015)[URL]
- "5·18 Daehan Maewoo Shewoon Seolmyung 6gaji(6 Ways to Easily Explain 5·18 Democratization Movements)" (2016)[URL]
- "Minjoohwaui Gyunincha: Gwangju Minjuhwa Wundong (Trigger of Democratization: 5·18 Democratization Movements)" (2000)[URL]
- "Moon Daetongryung 5·18 Chodbulhyeokmyung Jeonshin Badduleo Minjujuui Bokwonhalgud(President Moon: We should Restore Democracy Based on the Sprite of 5·18 Democratization Movement and the Candle Revolution)" (2017)[URL]
- "Chodbul Hyeokmyungui Jeongshinul Goochejeokin Jeongchaek Seongkwaro(Making the Spirit of Candle Revolution into Concrete Policy Outcomes)" (2019)[URL]
- "Eo Yun Dae Kookka Brand Wiwonjang ‘Dynamic Korea’ Bakwaya(The Directore of National Brand Committee, Eo Yun Dae: ‘Dynamic Korea’ should be replaced)" (2009)[URL]
- "Chodbul Hyeokmyungui Ghwaje(The lessons from Candle Revolution)" (2017)[URL]
- "12·12 Satae Joomok... 1979nyun 12wol 12il Chun Doo Whan Rho Tae Woo ga Gangjero(Attention to 12·12 Coup... Chun Do Whan and Rho Tae Woo Coerced on 12th of Dec. of 1979)" (2019)[URL]