본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국에 있어서 외국중재판정의 승인 및 집행 거절 사유인 공서와 법의 지배

The Public Policy Ground for Refusing Enforcement of Arbitral Awards and Rule of Law in Chinese

김선정
한국중재학회 (Korean Association Of Arbitration Studies(Kaas))|2008.12|중재연구 (JOURNAL OF ARBITRATION STUDIES)|제18권 제3호|pp. 23-50|DOI 10.16998/jas.2008.18.3.23

2

조회

0

다운로드

14

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Rule of Law법의지배외국중재판정의 승인 및 집행중재와 공서홍콩중재의 중국내 집행내지의 사회적 공공이익과 홍콩의 공서인민법원과 중재Arbitration and Public PolicyRecognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration AwardEnforcement of Hongkong Arbitration in ChinaSocial Public Interest of the Mainland or Public Policy of the Hong KongPeoples Court and Arbitration
주제분류무역학

초록

In a global economy where private parties increasingly favour arbitration over litigation, many foreigners are unfortunately reluctant to arbitration with China's parties because the China national courts do not scrutinize the merits when deciding whether to recognize and enforce foreign awards. As a result, the finality of arbitral awards hangs in uncertainty. Overseas concern is that China's courts may abuse "Public Policy" grounds provided for in the New York Convention to set aside or refuse to enforce foreign awards. The purpose of this article is to examine the distrust to enforcement of arbitral awards whether that is just an assumption. In spite of the modernize and internationalize her international arbitration system and many reforms provided in the related law and rules, the most vexing leftover issues are caused of the lack of "rule of law" in China. This situation imply the risk of pervert 'Public Policy' as the ground for refusing enforcement of arbitral awards. Some cases reflect the fear. But it is unclear whether those cases caused from the lack of "rule of law" in China. Same uncertainty present between Hon Kong-China under th one country-two legal system after the return of Hong Kong to China on 1 July 1997. While China is striving to improve its enforcement mechanism in regard to the enforcement of arbitral awards, it can only be expect following the establishment of rule of law in the future.

Abstract

In a global economy where private parties increasingly favour arbitration over litigation, many foreigners are unfortunately reluctant to arbitration with China's parties because the China national courts do not scrutinize the merits when deciding whether to recognize and enforce foreign awards. As a result, the finality of arbitral awards hangs in uncertainty. Overseas concern is that China's courts may abuse "Public Policy" grounds provided for in the New York Convention to set aside or refuse to enforce foreign awards. The purpose of this article is to examine the distrust to enforcement of arbitral awards whether that is just an assumption. In spite of the modernize and internationalize her international arbitration system and many reforms provided in the related law and rules, the most vexing leftover issues are caused of the lack of "rule of law" in China. This situation imply the risk of pervert 'Public Policy' as the ground for refusing enforcement of arbitral awards. Some cases reflect the fear. But it is unclear whether those cases caused from the lack of "rule of law" in China. Same uncertainty present between Hon Kong-China under th one country-two legal system after the return of Hong Kong to China on 1 July 1997. While China is striving to improve its enforcement mechanism in regard to the enforcement of arbitral awards, it can only be expect following the establishment of rule of law in the future.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. 강희갑, "중국의 국제상사중재규칙의 개정과 중재판정의 승인 및 집행", 중재, (292) (1999)
  2. 김경배, "외국중재판정의 집행판결에서 나타난 집행거부사유에 관한 고찰", 중재연구, 14(1) (2004)
  3. 김상호, "한국에서의 외국중재판정의 승인과 집행", 중재연구, 17(3) (2007)
  4. 김선정, "이유기재없는 중재판정", 중재학회지, 4 (1994)
  5. 김선정, "홍콩 중재령에 있어서 UNCITRAL모범법의 수용", 중재학회지, 7 (1997)
  6. 董立坤, "중국 내지와 홍콩의 법률충돌 및 조정" (2006), 법무부
  7. 박영길, "국제중재판정의 집행을 거부하기 위한 사유로서의 공서", 중재연구, 12(1) (2002)
  8. 신창섭, "우리나라와 중국 중재법에서 중재판정의 취소사유에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 16(2) (2006)
  9. 이주원, "중국 중재제도의 특징에 관한 소고", 중재연구, 15(3) (2005)
  10. 이호원, "외국중재판정의 승인과 집행, 재판자료 제34집" (1986), 섭외사건의 제문제(하)
  11. 이호원, "한국에 있어서의 외국중재판정의 승인 및 집행", 중재연구, 13(1) (2003)
  12. 于健龍, "中國的仲裁制度及仲裁裁決的執行", 한중일 상사중재 국제학술대회자료집 (2008)
  13. 王承杰, "國際商事爭議解決的重要方式-仲裁", 한국중재학회 외 공동주최 한ㆍ중ㆍ러 상사중재 국제학술대회자료집
  14. 윤진기, "2005년 CIETAC중재규칙 개정과 중국 중재법상의 문제점 개선", 중재연구, 16(3) (2006)
  15. 윤진기, "중국중재법", 기업법연구, 12 (2003)
  16. 王紅松, "중국대륙의 중재제도", 중재연구, 13(2) (2004)
  17. 장문철, "외국판결과 외국중재판정의 승인 및 집행", 중재학회지, 3 (1993)
  18. 장복희, "국제중재와 공서문제", 중재 (1998)
  19. 차경자, "중국의 섭외 및 외국중재판정강제집행제도 연구", 중재연구, 15(2) (2005)
  20. "梶田幸雄, “香港におけるCIETAC仲裁判斷の執行問題および中國の調停の特徵”, 「JCAジャ?ナル」 第55卷 第7?(2008)", ~ (2008)
  21. 方新, "日中ビジネス紛爭と國際商事仲裁 「中國の商事仲裁制度について」", JCAジャナル, 55(7) (2008)
  22. 森川伸吾, "外國判決の承認ㆍ執行の要件としての裁判官の獨立(一)-中國を例として-", 法學論叢, 161(2) (2007), 京都大學
  23. 森川伸吾, "外國判決の承認ㆍ執行の要件としての裁判官の獨立(二)-中國を例として-", 法學論叢, 161(3) (2007), 京都大學
  24. 森川伸吾, "外國判決の承認ㆍ執行の要件としての裁判官の獨立(三)-中國を例として-", 法學論叢, 161(5) (2007), 京都大學
  25. 森川伸吾, "外國判決の承認ㆍ執行の要件としての裁判官の獨立(四)-中國を例として", 法學論叢, 161(6) (2007), 京都大學
  26. 熊琳, "中國における國際商事仲裁判斷の執行", JCAジャナル, 55(1), pp.熊琳~ (2008)
  27. 王莉, "中國における香港特別行政區間の仲裁判斷の承認ㆍ執行-司法協力政策としての國際私法の可能性についての一考察", 神戶法學, 54(2) (2004)
  28. 村上, "外國仲裁判斷が中國の秩序に反しないとされた事例", JCAジャナル, 54(6) (2007)
  29. 潭 兵, "民事訴訟法學" (2007), 法律出版社
  30. 宋航, "國際商事仲裁裁決的承認與執行" (2000), 法律出版社
  31. 王吉文, "公共秩序保留制度的式微", 江西財經大學學報, (44) (2006)
  32. 王泰銓, "香港基本法" (1996), 三民書局
  33. Amokura Kawharu, "The Public Policy Ground for Setting Aside and Refusing Enforcement of Arbitral Awards", J. of Int'l Arb, 24(5) (2007)
  34. Caros De Vera, "Arbitrating Harmony: 'Med-Arb' and the Confluence of Culture and Rule of Law in the Resolution of International Commercial Disputes in Chiana" (2004), Colum. J. Asian L
  35. David T. Wang, "Judicial Reform in China: Improving Arbitration Award Enforcement by Establishing a Federal Court System" (2008), Santa Clara L. Rev
  36. Diana Tapola, "Recent case law on the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Russia", J. of Int'l Arb, 22(4) (2005)
  37. Ellen Reinstein, "Finding a Happy Ending for Foreign Investors: The Enforcement of Arbitration Awards in The People's Republic of China" (2005), Ind. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev.
  38. Fiona D'Souza, "The Recognition and Enforcement of Commercial Arbitral Awards in The People's Republic of China" (2007), Fordham Int'l L.J.
  39. Guiguo Wang, "One Country, Two Arbitration Systems, Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in Hong Kong and China", J. of Int'l Arb, 14(1) (1997)
  40. Jian Zhou, "Judicial Intervention in International Arbitration: A Comparative Study the Scope of The New York Convention in U.S. and Chinese Courts", Pac. Rim L. & Pol'y, 15 (2006)
  41. Jingzhou Tao, "Arbitration Law and Practice in China, Kluwer Law International, 2004", ~ (2004)
  42. Joseph T. McLaughlin, "Catherine X. Pan, “Planning for Commercial Dispute Resolution in Mainland China”" (2005), Am. Rev. Int'l Arb
  43. Luming Chen, "Some reflection on international commercial arbitration in China", J. of Int'l Arb, 13(2) (1996)
  44. Michael Moser, "China and the Enforcement of Arbitral Awards", JCIArb, 61(2) (1995)
  45. Michael Pryles, "Reflections on Transnational Public Policy", J. of Int'l Arb, 24(1) (2007)
  46. Randall Peerenboom, "Seek Truth from Facts: An Empirical Study of Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in the PRC" (2001), Am. J. Comp. L.
  47. William R. Spiegelberger, "Russian court practice enforcing foreign arbtral awards: An overview", J. of Int'l Arb, 22(4) (2005)
  48. Xiaobing Xu, "One Country, Two - International Commercial Arbitration - Systems", J. of Int'l Arb, 17(6) (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

중국 판례에 나타난 외국중재판정 집행거절사유로서의 공공질서신지연, 이정표법학연구소 · 홍익법학2013 · 제14권 제4호Enforcement of South Korean Arbitral Awards in Mainland ChinaYANG, Fan한국중재학회 · 중재연구2015 · 제25권 제3호중국내 중재절차의 문제점과 개선방안－ 중재 실무의 관점에서 －강대섭, 서성호안암법학회 · 안암법학2014 · 제44호중국 법원의 외국중재판정 승인 및 집행 거부에 관한 실증적 연구하현수한국무역보험학회 · 무역금융보험연구2019 · 제20권 제2호외국중재판정의 승인 및 집행에 관한 중국의 실행최서지, 량빙지에, 리우하오법학연구소 · 법학연구2019 · 제60권 제3호중국의 중재판정 취소제도최송자한국중재학회 · 중재연구2015 · 제25권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)

국제상사중재에 있어서 중재지의 의미오석웅pp. 3-22미국의 증권중재제도에 관한 소고 - 공정성 요건을 중심으로 -김희철pp. 51-69국제 기술이전 거래에서의 계약이행과 상사분쟁 예방심상렬pp. 71-89온라인 ADR의 운영현황과 활성화 방안에 관한 연구최석범pp. 91-116중국중재제도의 국제표준화에 대한 연구김석철pp. 117-138
원문 보기