중국과 대만 간 투자분쟁해결제도에 관한 연구
A Study on the Resolution Mechanism of Investment Disputes between China and Taiwan
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Although there exist the political uncertainty between China and Taiwan, they are expanding economic exchange since 1980s. The economic exchange is not limited to trade area and it keeps expanding to investment area continuously. In case of investment, it was a one-side investment of Taiwan in the past, but according to the policy of Taiwan government in 2009, Chinese capital is able to flow into Taiwan for direct investment. These kinds of policy changes related to investment between two countries require follow-up actions such as profit protection for investors, getting rid of investment limitation, simplification of investment procedure, and establishing of investment dispute resolution system. The main topic of this study is to discuss the resolution mechanism of investment disputes between China and Taiwan, in present the individual investment dispute between two countries is settled based on each country's own regulation for dispute resolution. However, these two countries didn't prepare regulation for dispute resolution related to the cases of the investment dispute between Chinese/Taiwanese investors and Chinese/Taiwanese government, and also between Chinese government and Taiwanese government. Moreover, they didn't agree anything related to investment disputes. Therefore, in this paper, I enumerate the regulations related to investment dispute resolution between China and Taiwan, and then I would like to point out the problems and suggest solutions for improvement. Also, through this study, I would like to contribute to establishing and implementing of investment dispute resolution mechanism between South Korea and North Korea.
Abstract
Although there exist the political uncertainty between China and Taiwan, they are expanding economic exchange since 1980s. The economic exchange is not limited to trade area and it keeps expanding to investment area continuously. In case of investment, it was a one-side investment of Taiwan in the past, but according to the policy of Taiwan government in 2009, Chinese capital is able to flow into Taiwan for direct investment. These kinds of policy changes related to investment between two countries require follow-up actions such as profit protection for investors, getting rid of investment limitation, simplification of investment procedure, and establishing of investment dispute resolution system. The main topic of this study is to discuss the resolution mechanism of investment disputes between China and Taiwan, in present the individual investment dispute between two countries is settled based on each country's own regulation for dispute resolution. However, these two countries didn't prepare regulation for dispute resolution related to the cases of the investment dispute between Chinese/Taiwanese investors and Chinese/Taiwanese government, and also between Chinese government and Taiwanese government. Moreover, they didn't agree anything related to investment disputes. Therefore, in this paper, I enumerate the regulations related to investment dispute resolution between China and Taiwan, and then I would like to point out the problems and suggest solutions for improvement. Also, through this study, I would like to contribute to establishing and implementing of investment dispute resolution mechanism between South Korea and North Korea.
참고문헌 (37)
- ｢대만 중국자본 투자 3차 개방｣, kotra 경제, "산업 동향", 김다영, 2012
- 김석민, "韓？中 FTA 履行을 위한 貿易救濟條項의 比較法的 考察", 국제지역연구, 11(2), pp.540~565 (2007), 국제지역학회
- 중․홍콩 CEPA의 주요내용과 시사점: 서비스협상을 중심으로, "대외경제정책연구원", KIEP, ~, pp.KIEP 지역경제 포커스 09-28호 (2009)
- 박완근, "중국대륙과 대만사이의 상사중재 현황과 전망 -북한개성공단의 상사분쟁해결책을 위한 비교법적 고찰", 성균관법학, 16(2) (2004)
- 중국과 대만의 교류협력 법제 연구, "법무부", 법무부, ~ (2008)
- 이재민, "ISD 분쟁해결절차에 대한 소고", 서울국제법연구, 13(2), pp.103~109 (2006), 서울국제법연구원
- 정용균, "중국에서의 상사중재판정 집행에 관한 동향과 제도개선 연구 : 외국투자자 관점을 중심으로", 중재연구, 20(1), pp.133~167 (2010), 한국중재학회
- 하현수, "중국과 대만간 중재판정의 상호집행에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 19(1), pp.45~65 (2009), 한국중재학회
- 하현수, "중국 법원의 중재판정 승인 및 집행에서 공공질서 적용에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 21(3), pp.115~136 (2011), 한국중재학회
- ECFA 우리기업에게 득인가, 실인가?-ECFA 체결 1주년 점검, "korta", KOCHI, ~, pp.KOCHI자료 11-008 (2011)
- 金文杰, "大陸赴臺投資保險可行途徑淺析", 益陽職業技術學院學報, 1 (2010)
- 盧炯星, "論海峽兩岸投資中的問題及法律對策" (2007), 海峽兩岸WTO法律論壇論文集
- 戴肇洋, "建立海峽兩岸經濟合作之硏究-兼論簽署ECFA續待解決之問題", 綜合競爭力, 4 (2010)
- 董世忠, "國際經濟法" (2009), 復旦大學出版社
- 徐步林, "海峽兩岸司法協助現狀及發展", 法制與社會, 9 (2009)
- 徐崇利, "晩近國際投資爭端解決實踐之批判: ‘全球治理’理論的引入", 法學家, 3 (2010)
- 孫志煜, "區域經貿爭端解決的制度與實踐—以中國-東盟自由貿易區爲例", 法學評論, 1 (2011)
- 吳智, "兩岸投資走向自由化的法律路徑選擇", 時代法學, 7(6) (2009)
- 吳智, "從WTO法角度審視臺灣限制大陸直接投資的非法性與不當性", 國際經濟法學刊, 15(1) (2008)
- 姚若賢, "臺商隱名投資權益的法律保護", 福建法學, (3) (2009)
- 劉想樹, "中國涉外仲裁裁決制度與學理硏究" (2001), 法律出版社
- 劉仁山, "我國大陸與臺灣地區民商事判決相互承認與執行現狀, 問題及思考", 中國國際私法學會2009年會論文集 (2009)
- 尹紅, "臺灣地區‘陸資入臺’相關法律分析", 湖南省社會主義學院學報, 11(3) (2010)
- 王淑敏, "后ECFA時代兩岸投資爭端的司法協助探析", 國際貿易問題, (7) (2011)
- 王傳麗, "WTO: 一介自給自足的法律體系-兼論一國四地經貿法律新發展, In 載陳安主編｢國際經濟法學刊(第11卷)" (2004), 北京大學出版社
- 李忠義, "對臺商投資征收及其補償的幾点思考", 福建法學, (4) (2010)
- 林銀木, "陸資入臺’可能面臨的投資風險及其應對之策", 福建法學, (2) (2010)
- 林一飛, "中國國際商事仲裁裁決的執行" (2006), 對外經濟貿易大學出版社
- 張萬明, "涉臺法律問題總論" (2003), 法律出版社
- 曾憲義, "海峽兩岸交往的法律問題" (1992), 河南人民出版社
- 陳力, "海峽兩岸民商事法方面協作的困境與出路, In 載于｢海峽兩岸民生與經貿往來中的法律問題｣" (2009), 法律出版社
- 陳力, "海峽兩岸投資爭議解決機制之構建與完善", 復旦學報(社會科學版), (6) (2011)
- 陳泉生, "海峽兩岸關係的法律深討" (1992), 四川大學出版社
- 彭莉, "論ECFA框架下兩岸經貿爭端解決機制的建構", 臺灣硏究集刊, (6) (2010)
- 包運成, "我國有關‘陸資入臺’法律問題初探", 社會科學家, (2) (2010)
- 黃潔, "陸資赴臺法律保障問題硏究", 河北法學, 30(3) (2012)
- 黃萃, "區域貿易協議爭端解決機制構建與實效反差硏究", 國際貿易硏究, (12) (2010)