중국의 투자자-국가 간 분쟁 해결제도에 관한 연구
A Study on the Resolution Mechanism for Dispute between Investor and State in China
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Chinese ISD has been changed a lot since the reformation policy in 1978 and it is expected that China will present a changed attitude toward its advantage as its industrialization continues to advance. This study generally examines the ISD in BIT and also considers not only the attitude of China with regard to ISD but also the changes on the Chinese side. Moreover, this study determines the areas on which the Chinese government focuses. In order to conduct this study, the author attempts to classify the attitudes on ISD into chronical change and treaty powers based on the analysis of BIT. In addition, the paper examines the main contents of ISD in BIT which previously involved an agreement such as arbitral institution, arbitral range, counter-measures of local country,standard for admitting the nationality of corporate investors, and recognition and enforcement of arbitral award. Based on analysis, this paper mentions matters that require attention and caution in the Korea-China FTA as regards investment negotiation, and also suggests instructions for investors who may face dispute with the Chinese government.
Abstract
Chinese ISD has been changed a lot since the reformation policy in 1978 and it is expected that China will present a changed attitude toward its advantage as its industrialization continues to advance. This study generally examines the ISD in BIT and also considers not only the attitude of China with regard to ISD but also the changes on the Chinese side. Moreover, this study determines the areas on which the Chinese government focuses. In order to conduct this study, the author attempts to classify the attitudes on ISD into chronical change and treaty powers based on the analysis of BIT. In addition, the paper examines the main contents of ISD in BIT which previously involved an agreement such as arbitral institution, arbitral range, counter-measures of local country,standard for admitting the nationality of corporate investors, and recognition and enforcement of arbitral award. Based on analysis, this paper mentions matters that require attention and caution in the Korea-China FTA as regards investment negotiation, and also suggests instructions for investors who may face dispute with the Chinese government.
참고문헌 (46)
- 김관호, "중국의 투자협정 정책의 변화와 한중투자협정의 고찰", 동북아경제연구, 20(1), pp.207~239 (2008), 한국동북아경제학회
- 김호, "한중 투자보장협정을 통한 ISD제도에 관한 고찰", 인천법학론총, 14 (2012), 인천대학교 법학연구소
- 남영숙, "중국의 최근 투자협정의 변화: 한-중 투자보장협정과 중-뉴질랜드 FTA를 중심으로", 통상법률, (89), pp.46~76 (2009), 법무부
- 목영준, "상사중재법" (2011), 박영사
- 유예리, "한-중 FTA 투자협정의 주요 쟁점 고찰", 국제법학회논총, 57(1)통권 : 124, pp.119~156 (2012), 대한국제법학회
- 이기평, "한중FTA투자챕터상 MFN조항의 ISDS절차에 대한 적용문제 연구", 법학논고, (40), pp.713~748 (2012), 법학연구원
- 이남구, "중국의 외국인투자 유치정책과 현황", 중국연구, 10 (1991), 한양대학교 중국문제연구소
- 하현수, "중국의 하자중재합의 효력 인정에 관한 연구", 관세학회지, 14(2), pp.169~185 (2013), 한국관세학회
- 하현수, "중국과 대만간 중재판정의 상호집행에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 19(1), pp.45~65 (2009), 한국중재학회
- 하현수, "중국 법원의 중재판정 승인 및 집행에서 공공질서 적용에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 21(3), pp.115~136 (2011), 한국중재학회
- 하현수, "국제투자중재의 판정취소제도에 관한 연구", 관세학회지, 13(2), pp.231~247 (2012), 한국관세학회
- 하현수, "중국과 대만 간 투자분쟁해결제도에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 22(2), pp.31~52 (2012), 한국중재학회
- 한국은행 조사국, "해외경제 포커스", 한국은행, 제2013-4호, ~ (2003)
- 單文華, "Calvo主義死了嗎", 國際經濟法學刊, 15(2) (2008)
- 徐崇利, "從南北紛爭焦點的轉移看國際投資法的晩近發展", 比較法硏究, 1 (1997)
- 徐崇利, "九七’之后國際投資條約繼續適用于香港特別行政區問題的爭議", 中國法與 比較法年刊, 1(2) (1996)
- 肖芳, "國際投資仲裁裁決在中國的承認與執行", 法學家, 6 (2011)
- 宋慶宙, "略論中韓新舊BIT之差異及對中國的影向", 知識經濟, 10 (2010)
- 沈四寶, "論國際條約在我國的適用", 甘肅社會科學, 3 (2010)
- 沈偉, "論中國雙邊投資協定中限制性投資爭端解決條款的解釋和適用", 中外法學, 24(5) (2012)
- 楊趣玲, "評‘謝業深案’仲裁條款適用範圍認定問題-兼論我國雙邊投資協定序言的規範路徑", 厦門廣播電視大學學報, 2 (2011)
- 梁詠, "我國海外投資之間接徵收風險及對策-基于‘平安公司-豊通集團案’的解讀", 法商硏究, 1 (2010)
- 余勁松・詹曉寧, "國際投資協定的進期發展及對中國的影響", 法學家, 3 (2006)
- 李燁, "中國雙邊投資條約政策與定位的實證分析", 國際經濟法學刊, 16(3) (2009)
- 李玲, "中國雙邊投資保護協定締約實踐和面臨的挑戰", 國際經濟法學刊, 17(4) (2010)
- 李夢園, "論社會公共利益與商事仲裁的司法監督-對我國法院若干司法實踐的分析", 北京仲裁, 6 (2004)
- 林愛民, "國際投資協定爭議仲裁硏究", 박사, pp.2009
- 張瀟劍, "ICSID仲裁裁決的承認與執行", 西北大學學報, 4 (2010), 哲學社會科學版
- 曾華群, "變革期雙邊投資條約實踐述評", 國際經濟法學刊, 14(3) (2007)
- 曾華群, "論南北問題與雙邊投資條約實踐的發展趨向, In 載于｢國際經濟秩序與國際經濟法新發展" (2009), 法律出版社
- 陣安, "南北矛盾視覺’應當‘摒棄’嗎?-聚焦中加2012BIT", 現代法學, 35(2) (2013)
- 陣安, "論國際經濟法學" (2008), 復旦大學出版社
- 陣安, "對香港居民謝業深訴秘魯政府案ICSID管轄權裁定的四項質疑-<中國-秘魯BIT>適用于‘一國 兩制’下的中國香港特別行政區嗎", 國際經濟法學刊, 17(1) (2010)
- 陣安, "關于中國應否參加‘華盛頓條約’,可否接受‘解決投資爭端國際中心’仲裁體制的分岐意見, In 載于｢國際投資爭端仲裁-‘解決投資爭端國際中心’機制硏究" (2001), 復旦大學出版社
- 陣安, "區分兩類國家, 實行差別互惠; 再論ICSID體制賦與中國的四大‘安全網’不宜貿然全面拆除", 國際經濟法學刊, 14(3) (2007)
- 陣輝萍, "ECFA框架下海峽兩岸投資協議的法律思考", 時代法學, 10(3) (2012)
- Berg, Albert Jan van den, "The New York Arbitration Convention of 1958: Towards a Uniform Judicial Interpretation" (1981), Kluwer Law International
- Berger, Axel, "China's New Bilateral Investment Treaty Programme : Substance, Rational and Implications for International Investment Law Making", 國際經濟法學刊, 16(4) (2009)
- Guzman, Andrew T., "Why LDCs Sign Treaties that Hurt Them : Explaining the Popularity of Bilateral Investment Treaties", Virginia Journal of International Law, 38 (1998)
- Jackson, John Howard, "New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honour of John H. Jackson" (2000), Kluwer Law International
- Kong, Qingjiang, "Bilateral Investment Treaties: The Chinese Approach and Practice", Asian Yearbook of International Law, 8 (1998)
- Salacuse, Jeswald W., "Do BITs Really Work? An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain", Harvard International Law Journal, 46(1) (2005)
- Schreuer, Christoph H., "The ICSID Convention : A Commentary" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- UNCTAD, "International Investment Rule-making: Stocktaking, Challenges and the Way forward, UNCTAD Series on International Investment Policies for Development (UNCTAD", ITE, 2007, pp.3), United Nations[DOI]
- World Investment Report 2012, "UNCTAD", United Nations, ~ (2012)
- World Investment Report 2013, "UNCTAD", United Nations, ~ (2013)