본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국 BIT상 최혜국대우조항의 투자자-국가 간 분쟁해결절차에 적용에 관한 연구

Study on the Applicability of Most-Favored-Nation clause in Investor-State Dispute Settlement under Chinaʼs BIT

하현수|장만
경영경제연구소 (management & economic research institute)|2019.03|아태비즈니스연구 ((APJB) Asia Pacific Journal of Business)|제10권 제1호|pp. 117-133|DOI https://doi.org/10.32599/apjb.10.1.201903.117

4

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

BITsISDMost-Favored-Nation Treatment clause

초록

This paper examines the most-favored-nation treatment clause on the BITs concluded by China and examines the attitudes of China on the application of the most-favored-nation treatment clause to the ISDs by period as the scope of arbitration increases. Moreover, this study pointed out the problems that would be exposed if the most-favored-nation treatment clause applies to ISDs and then also suggested solutions. The conclusions of this study are as follows; if the Chinese government strictly restricts the applicable expansion of the most-favored-nation treatment clause to the dispute settlement procedure by considering only the position of the capital importing country, it implies a contradiction against the development trend of the arbitration system related to international investment disputes. Of course, in order to protect the rights of Chinese investors investing abroad, expanding the applicability of the most-favored-nation treatment clause to the ISDs procedure unconditionally may have a negative impact under Chinaʼs dual status of being a capital-importing country and a capital-exporting country. Therefore, China should clearly define the scope of application of the most-favored-nation treatment clause, the completion of the local remedy for the host country in cases of BIT to be concluded in the future or amended, and also clearly define that the most-favored-nation treatment clause should not be retroactively applied into BITs already concluded as an exception of applicability of the most-favored-nation treatment.

Abstract

This paper examines the most-favored-nation treatment clause on the BITs concluded by China and examines the attitudes of China on the application of the most-favored-nation treatment clause to the ISDs by period as the scope of arbitration increases. Moreover, this study pointed out the problems that would be exposed if the most-favored-nation treatment clause applies to ISDs and then also suggested solutions. The conclusions of this study are as follows; if the Chinese government strictly restricts the applicable expansion of the most-favored-nation treatment clause to the dispute settlement procedure by considering only the position of the capital importing country, it implies a contradiction against the development trend of the arbitration system related to international investment disputes. Of course, in order to protect the rights of Chinese investors investing abroad, expanding the applicability of the most-favored-nation treatment clause to the ISDs procedure unconditionally may have a negative impact under Chinaʼs dual status of being a capital-importing country and a capital-exporting country. Therefore, China should clearly define the scope of application of the most-favored-nation treatment clause, the completion of the local remedy for the host country in cases of BIT to be concluded in the future or amended, and also clearly define that the most-favored-nation treatment clause should not be retroactively applied into BITs already concluded as an exception of applicability of the most-favored-nation treatment.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Dan, Wen-Hua, "Is Calvo doctrine dead", Journal of International Economic Law, 15(2), pp.172~211 (2008)
  2. Fan, Jian-Hong, "Introduction to International Investment Law" (2000), Zhejiang University Press
  3. 하현수, "중국의 투자자-국가 간 분쟁 해결제도에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 23(4), pp.29~53 (2013), 한국중재학회[DOI]
  4. 강승관, "국제투자규범상 최혜국대우원칙의 확대적용 문제에 관한 고찰 -Siemens v. Argentina 사건과Wintershall v. Argentina 사건의비교⋅분석 및 한국에의 시사점-", 국제법평론, (31), pp.241~267 (2010), 국제법평론회
  5. 김경배, "FTA투자규정에 있어서 최혜국대우 조항의 적용범위에 관한 중재판정 사례연구", 중재연구, 20(1), pp.109~131 (2010), 한국중재학회[DOI]
  6. 김석호, "국제투자조약상 ‘최혜국대우 조항’의 적용범위 - 분쟁해결조항에의 적용여부를 중심으로 -", 법학연구, (50), pp.213~235 (2013), 한국법학회
  7. 김여선, "국제투자법상 최혜국대우조항에 관한 연구", 국제거래법연구, 19(2), pp.263~282 (2010), 국제거래법학회
  8. A study on the draft of the China’s BIT model and its existing Investment Chapters prior to the Korea-China FTA, "Lee, Ki-Pyeong", Legislation Research Institute, ~ (2014)
  9. 이기평, "중국투자협정연구 －Tza Yap Shum v. The Republic of Peru Case사건의 중재관할권 결정에 대한 분석－", 중국법연구, 15, pp.143~172 (2011), 한중법학회[DOI]
  10. Li, Chao, "Study on the Application of the MFN Clause in the Settlement of Investment Disputes", Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology, 19(3), pp.56~63 (2017)
  11. Li, HaoPei, "Introduction to the Law of Treaties", pp.26~27 (2003), Law Press
  12. Liang, Yong, "The Research on ISDS Cases Involvement with China： China’s Experiences and Relevant Improvement Suggestions", Chinese Review of International Law, pp.98~116 (2017)
  13. 박선욱, "양자간 투자협정상 최혜국대우규정의 절차법적 적용에 관한 연구 -다자주의로의 전환을 중심으로-", 법학연구, (39), pp.335~358 (2010), 한국법학회
  14. 서철원, "최혜국대우 조항과 투자분쟁해결절차와의 관계: 포괄적 이해를 위한 제안", 국제법학회논총, 53(2), pp.109~140 (2008), 대한국제법학회
  15. Qiao, Jiao, "Study on the Applicability of the Most-Favored-Nation clause in the Settlement of Investment Disputes under BIT", The Rule of Law Forum, 26(1), pp.61~69 (2011)
  16. 14, "Beijing Urban Construction Group Co. , Ltd. v. Yemen. ICSID Case No. AＲB", pp.Wuhan University Press, 30
  17. "Camuzzi v. Argentina. ICSID Case No. ARB", 03, ~
  18. "Emilio Agustin Maffezini v. Kingdom of Spain. ICSID Case NO. ARB", 97, ~
  19. "Gas Natural SDG S. A. v. Argentian. ICSID Case No.ARB", 03, ~
  20. "National Grid plc v. The Argentine Republic. Decision On Jurisdiction dated 20 June 2006", ~ (2006)
  21. "Ping An Life Insurance Company of China, Limited and Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China, Limited v. Kingdom of Belgium. ICSID Case No. ARB", 12, ~
  22. "Plama Consortium Ltd. v. Republic of Bulgaria. ICSID No. ARB", 03, ~
  23. "Sanum Investments Limited v. Lao People’s Democratic Republic, PCA Case No. 2013－13", ~ (2013)
  24. "Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited. ICSID Case No. ARB", 10, ~
  25. "Salini Construttori S.p.A. and Italstrade v. The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. ICSID No.ARB", 02, ~
  26. "Suez, Scoiedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A. and Interagua Servicios Integrales de Agua S. A. v. Argentine Republic. ICSID Case No. ARB", 03, ~
  27. "Tecnicas Medioambientales Tecmed, S. A. v. Mexico. ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)", 00, 07, pp.6
  28. "Vivendi Universal v. Argentine Republic. ICSID Case No. ARB", 97, ~

관련 논문AI추천

한중FTA투자챕터상 MFN조항의 ISDS절차에 대한 적용문제 연구이기평법학연구원 · 법학논고2012 · 제40호국제투자법상 최혜국대우조항에 관한 연구김여선, 오영기국제거래법학회 · 국제거래법연구2010 · 제19권 제2호중국의 투자자-국가 간 분쟁 해결제도에 관한 연구하현수한국중재학회 · 중재연구2013 · 제23권 제4호FTA투자규정에 있어서 최혜국대우 조항의 적용범위에 관한 중재판정 사례연구김경배한국중재학회 · 중재연구2010 · 제20권 제1호China’s Practice in International Investment LawGuiguo Wang법학연구소 · 서울대학교 법학2012 · 제53권 제4호중국의 투자협정 상 ‘수용 보상금액 중재조항’에 관한 연구하현수한국무역보험학회 · 무역금융보험연구2021 · 제22권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

Quantitative Tests for Income Level Convergence in Asian Countries황진영, Wilma Milo Tejeropp. 1-11A Cross Cultural Study Regarding Motivations for Visiting Ethnic RestaurantsSainatee Chernbumroong, 김영국, 장서연pp. 13-23심리적 주인의식과 혁신행동에 관한 연구: 직무만족과 직무열의를 중심으로정동섭pp. 25-38조직문화와 혁신행동 간의 관계에서 조직신뢰, 의사소통의 매개효과: 제조업을 중심으로정다운, 전병준pp. 39-54친환경 제품의 외재적 속성이 지각된 가치, 지각된 위험 및 구매의도에 미치는 영향: 중국 유기농우유를 중심으로Xuexu Piao, 박상문pp. 55-72
원문 보기