Evaluation of medical school faculty members’ educational performance in Korea in 2022 through analysis of the promotion regulations: a mixed methods study
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose To ensure faculty members’ active participation in education in response to growing demand, medical schools should clearly describe educational activities in their promotion regulations. This study analyzed the status of how medical education activities are evaluated in promotion regulations in 2022, in Korea. Methods Data were collected from promotion regulations retrieved by searching the websites of 22 medical schools/universities in August 2022. To categorize educational activities and evaluation methods, the Association of American Medical Colleges framework for educational activities was utilized. Correlations between medical schools’ characteristics and the evaluation of medical educational activities were analyzed. Results We defined 6 categories, including teaching, development of education products, education administration and service, scholarship in education, student affairs, and others, and 20 activities with 57 sub-activities. The average number of included activities was highest in the development of education products category and lowest in the scholarship in education category. The weight adjustment factors of medical educational activities were the characteristics of the target subjects and faculty members, the number of involved faculty members, and the difficulty of activities. Private medical schools tended to have more educational activities in the regulations than public medical schools. The greater the number of faculty members, the greater the number of educational activities in the education administration and service categories. Conclusion Medical schools included various medical education activities and their evaluation methods in promotion regulations in Korea. This study provides basic data for improving the rewarding system for efforts of medical faculty members in education.
Abstract
Purpose To ensure faculty members’ active participation in education in response to growing demand, medical schools should clearly describe educational activities in their promotion regulations. This study analyzed the status of how medical education activities are evaluated in promotion regulations in 2022, in Korea. Methods Data were collected from promotion regulations retrieved by searching the websites of 22 medical schools/universities in August 2022. To categorize educational activities and evaluation methods, the Association of American Medical Colleges framework for educational activities was utilized. Correlations between medical schools’ characteristics and the evaluation of medical educational activities were analyzed. Results We defined 6 categories, including teaching, development of education products, education administration and service, scholarship in education, student affairs, and others, and 20 activities with 57 sub-activities. The average number of included activities was highest in the development of education products category and lowest in the scholarship in education category. The weight adjustment factors of medical educational activities were the characteristics of the target subjects and faculty members, the number of involved faculty members, and the difficulty of activities. Private medical schools tended to have more educational activities in the regulations than public medical schools. The greater the number of faculty members, the greater the number of educational activities in the education administration and service categories. Conclusion Medical schools included various medical education activities and their evaluation methods in promotion regulations in Korea. This study provides basic data for improving the rewarding system for efforts of medical faculty members in education.
참고문헌 (14)
- Shumway JM, "Association for Medical Education in Europe. AMEE guide no. 25: the assessment of learning outcomes for the competent and reflective physician", Med Teach, 25, pp.569~584 (2003)[DOI]
- Meeuwissen SN, "Multiple-role mentoring : mentors’ conceptualisations, enactments and role conflicts", Med Educ, 53, pp.605~615 (2019)[DOI]
- 나승주, "Application of Bloom’s taxonomy to formative assessment in real-time online classes in Korea", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 33(3), pp.191~201 (2021), 한국의학교육학회[DOI]
- Stojan J, "Online learning developments in undergraduate medical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 69", Med Teach, 44, pp.109~129 (2022)[DOI]
- Han ER, "Medical education trends for future physicians in the era of advanced technology and artificial intelligence : an integrative review", BMC Med Educ, 19, pp.460~ (2019)[DOI]
- Thomas PA, "Results of an academic promotion and career path survey of faculty at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine", Acad Med, 79, pp.258~264 (2004)[DOI]
- LeMaire SA, "An academic relative value unit system for incentivizing the academic productivity of surgery faculty members", Ann Surg, 268, pp.526~533 (2018)[DOI]
- Zuckerman MD, "Narrative review of clinical productivity and teaching in emergency medicine", Cureus, 13, pp.e14309~ (2021)[DOI]
- Nutter DO, "Measuring faculty effort and contributions in medical education", Acad Med, 75, pp.199~207 (2000)[DOI]
- Hong Bin Kim, "Influences of faculty evaluating system on educational performance of medical school faculty", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 28(3), pp.289~294 (2016), 한국의학교육학회
- Kaur N, "Practical mixed methods strategies used to integrate qualitative and quantitative methods in community-based primary health care research", Fam Pract, 36, pp.666~671 (2019)[DOI]
- Johnson RB, "Towards a definition of mixed method research", J Mix Methods Res, 1, pp.112~133 (2007)[DOI]
- "Usefulness of correlation analysis" (2019)[URL]
- "Basic medical education accreditation standards" (2022)[URL]