의과대학 교원 현황과 업적평가제도 특징 분석
Current Status and Performance Evaluation Systems of Faculty in Korean Medical Schools
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of this study is to analyze the current status and performance evaluation systems of faculty in Korean medical colleges and professional graduate medical schools (called medical schools). We developed a research tool based on previous studies and distributed it to 40 medical schools from July to October 2017. The response rate was 100%. We calculated the number of faculty members and analyzed the faculty evaluation systems and awareness according to national and private medical schools. As of 2017, the number of medical faculty in Korea was 11,111 (4,973 faculty were employed by their alma mater, which is 44.76% of the total), with non-medical doctor faculty accounting for 754 of the total. The medical schools reflect research achievements as most important for re-appointment and screening to promote faculty, and the area of education is secondary excepting clinical faculty of private medical schools. However, important issues in the faculty evaluation deal with the relevance of research achievement and the need for qualitative assessment. Some medical schools revised or have been revising the faculty evaluation system in areas such as minimum standards of education for promotion and separation of promotion and tenure review. Opening non-tenure track lines for faculty show positive effects such as increasing the number of positions for hire and easing the financial burdens of medical schools. Downfalls include inconsistencies between the responsibilities and actual practices of tenure not being available and the instability of faculty’s status. In conclusion, medical schools need to prepare a faculty evaluation system that fits the position of faculty members and attempt to establish a reasonable compensation system.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to analyze the current status and performance evaluation systems of faculty in Korean medical colleges and professional graduate medical schools (called medical schools). We developed a research tool based on previous studies and distributed it to 40 medical schools from July to October 2017. The response rate was 100%. We calculated the number of faculty members and analyzed the faculty evaluation systems and awareness according to national and private medical schools. As of 2017, the number of medical faculty in Korea was 11,111 (4,973 faculty were employed by their alma mater, which is 44.76% of the total), with non-medical doctor faculty accounting for 754 of the total. The medical schools reflect research achievements as most important for re-appointment and screening to promote faculty, and the area of education is secondary excepting clinical faculty of private medical schools. However, important issues in the faculty evaluation deal with the relevance of research achievement and the need for qualitative assessment. Some medical schools revised or have been revising the faculty evaluation system in areas such as minimum standards of education for promotion and separation of promotion and tenure review. Opening non-tenure track lines for faculty show positive effects such as increasing the number of positions for hire and easing the financial burdens of medical schools. Downfalls include inconsistencies between the responsibilities and actual practices of tenure not being available and the instability of faculty’s status. In conclusion, medical schools need to prepare a faculty evaluation system that fits the position of faculty members and attempt to establish a reasonable compensation system.
참고문헌 (28)
- Na MJ, "Analysis of faculty evaluation system of national universities in Korea" (2010), Ministry of Education
- 김승정, "대학 단위 외적 책무성 기제가 교수 연구 성과에 미치는 영향 분석", 교육행정학연구, 32(2), pp.137~160 (2014), 한국교육행정학회
- Sahlberg P, "Rethinking accountability in a knowledge society", J Educ Change, 11(1), pp.45~61 (2010)
- Ohrr H, "The study on the faculty evaluation system of teaching ability in Korea", Korean J Med Educ, 11(2), pp.297~312 (1999)
- 한경수, "교원업적평가와 성과연봉제 그리고 강의평가", 응용통계연구, 24(2), pp.435~443 (2011), 한국통계학회
- Fleming VM, "Separate and equitable promotion tracks for clinician-educators", JAMA, 294(9), pp.1101~1104 (2005)
- Shin JC, "Classifying higher education institutions in Korea : a performance-based approach", High Educ, 57(2), pp.247~266 (2009)
- 오승은, "고등교육 책무성에 대한 대학 기능유형별 차이: 교수의 인식 분석을 중심으로", 교육문제연구, 28(2), pp.1~26 (2015), 교육문제연구소
- Hong Bin Kim, "Influences of faculty evaluating system on educational performance of medical school faculty", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 28(3), pp.289~294 (2016), 한국의학교육학회
- Colbeck CL, "Integration: evaluating faculty work as a whole", New Dir Inst Res, (114), pp.43~52 (2002)
- Lee YS, "Inbreeding in faculties of Korean medical schools", Korean J Med Educ, 13(2), pp.299~308 (2001)
- 이윤성, "우리나라 의과대학 교수의 현황", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 16(3), pp.269~280 (2004), 한국의학교육학회
- Kim YI, "Faculty evaluation in Korean medical schools: part I. designing of basic guideline for assessment of faculty activities", Korean J Med Educ, 12(2), pp.153~162 (2000)
- 서경화, "의과대학 교수의 교육, 진료, 연구, 복지에 관한 조사연구", 대한의사협회지, 55(11), pp.1128~1141 (2012), 대한의사협회
- 김왕준, "국립대학 교수업적평가 관련규정 비교분석", 한국교원교육연구, 29(1), pp.143~165 (2012), 한국교원교육학회[DOI]
- Hazelkorn E, "Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: the battle for world-class excellence" (2011), Palgrave Macmillan
- 강명구, "어떤 학자와 교수를 키울 것인가: 대학평가와 지식생산", 커뮤니케이션 이론, 10(1), pp.127~168 (2014), 한국언론학회
- Ban SJ, "Discussions on improvement of faculty evaluation" (2010), The Korean Educational Administration Society
- Lee SH, "Korean faculty: who are they? what are they doing?" (1992), Hakgisa
- Park NK, "Analyzing the status of the faculty performance evaluation and developing a model for professors’ performance by each university" (2006), Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development
- Kim BJ, "Government finance to enhance educational power of universities" (2009), Ministry of Education
- Yun HB, "A study on the faculties’ satisfaction of medical university", Health Policy Forum, 3(1), pp.149~154 (2005)
- 맹광호, "21세기 한국 의학교육계획-희망과 도전", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 16(1), pp.1~12 (2004), 한국의학교육학회
- Association of American Medical Colleges, "Medical faculty job satisfaction:thematic overviews from ten focus groups" (2006), Association of American Medical Colleges
- Nyquist JG, "Faculty satisfaction in academic medicine", New Dir Inst Res, (105), pp.33~43 (2000)
- Kim CH, "Analysis research for implement of faculty-evaluation", J Educ, 13, pp.1~42 (1995)
- Bunton SA, "The continued evolution of faculty appointment and tenure policies at U.S. medical schools", Acad Med, 82(3), pp.281~289 (2007)
- Walling A, "Tenure appointments for faculty of clinical departments at U.S. medical schools: does specialty designation make a difference?", Acad Med, 93(11), pp.1719~1726 (2018)