Influences of faculty evaluating system on educational performance of medical school faculty
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The promotion of educators is challenged by the lack of accepted standards to evaluate the quality and impact of educational activities. Traditionally, promotion is related to research productivity. This study developed an evaluation tool for educational performance of medical school faculty using educator portfolios (EPs). Methods: Design principles and quantitative items for EPs were developed in a consensus workshop. These principles were tested in a simulation and revised based on feedback. The changes of total educational activities following introduction of the system were analyzed. Results: A total of 71% faculty members answered the simulation of the system and the score distributed widely (mean±standard deviation, 65.43±68.64). The introduction of new system significantly increased the total educational activities, especially in assistant professors. Conclusion: The authors offer comprehensive and practical tool for enhancing educational participation of faculty members. Further research for development of qualitative evaluation systems is needed.
Abstract
Purpose: The promotion of educators is challenged by the lack of accepted standards to evaluate the quality and impact of educational activities. Traditionally, promotion is related to research productivity. This study developed an evaluation tool for educational performance of medical school faculty using educator portfolios (EPs). Methods: Design principles and quantitative items for EPs were developed in a consensus workshop. These principles were tested in a simulation and revised based on feedback. The changes of total educational activities following introduction of the system were analyzed. Results: A total of 71% faculty members answered the simulation of the system and the score distributed widely (mean±standard deviation, 65.43±68.64). The introduction of new system significantly increased the total educational activities, especially in assistant professors. Conclusion: The authors offer comprehensive and practical tool for enhancing educational participation of faculty members. Further research for development of qualitative evaluation systems is needed.
참고문헌 (13)
- Thomas PA, "Results of an academic promotion and career path survey of faculty at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine", Acad Med, 79, pp.258~264 (2004)
- Buckley LM, "Attitudes of clinical faculty about career progress, career success and recognition, and commitment to academic medicine: results of a survey", Arch Intern Med, 160, pp.2625~2629 (2000)
- Levinson W, "Mission critical-integrating clinician-educators into academic medical centers", N Engl J Med, 341, pp.840~843 (1999)
- Ohrr H, "The study on the faculty evaluation system of teaching ability in Korea", Korean J Med Educ, 11, pp.297~312 (1999)
- Kim YI, "Faculty evaluation in Korean medical schools. Part I: designing of basic guideline for assessment of faculty activities", Korean J Med Educ, 12, pp.153~162 (2000)
- Beasley BW, "Promotion criteria for clinicianeducators in the United States and Canada: a survey of promotion committee chairpersons", JAMA, 278, pp.723~728 (1997)
- Levinson W, "Integrating clinician-educators into academic medical centers: challenges and potential solutions", Acad Med, 75, pp.906~912 (2000)
- Hafler JP, "Scholarly activities recorded in the portfolios of teacher-clinician faculty", Acad Med, 75, pp.649~652 (2000)
- Chandran L, "Evaluating the performance of medical educators: a novel analysis tool to demonstrate the quality and impact of educational activities", Acad Med, 84, pp.58~66 (2009)
- Gusic ME, "Evaluating educators using a novel toolbox: applying rigorous criteria flexibly across institutions", Acad Med, 89, pp.1006~1011 (2014)
- Simpson D, "Advancing educators and education by defining the components and evidence associated with educational scholarship", Med Educ, 41, pp.1002~1009 (2007)
- Simpson D, "Documentation systems for educators seeking academic promotion in U.S. medical schools", Acad Med, 79, pp.783~790 (2004)
- Bunton SA, "The continued evolution of faculty appointment and tenure policies at U.S. medical schools", Acad Med, 82, pp.281~289 (2007)