Evaluation research in Korean medical education: a systematic review
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study aims to analyze research trends related to ‘evaluation’ in Korean medical education through a systematic review. This study used a systematic review method, which is a research methodology for research trends and ‘literature analysis.’ Researchers searched the Korean journal literature published until the end of December 2020 in the Korean research database with keywords related to medicine and evaluation. Thus, 5,205 cases were identified. Based on these data, 143 papers were selected through a logical screening process, requiring 1 month to complete the data search and analysis process. In terms of publications, medical journals overwhelmingly outnumbered nonmedical journals until 2015; however, after 2016, the number of papers published in nonmedical journals increased, and the number of published papers was similar to that of medical journals. In terms of evaluation-related research, research on student and program evaluations has been very active compared to that on accreditation. As the number of evaluation studies has gradually decreased over the past 10 years, preparing a plan to revitalize them in Korean medical education is necessary. Considering that the role of evaluation in education has been emphasized in recent years, research on reestablishing the concept of evaluation; developing evaluation indicators; analyzing the status of student evaluation, program evaluation, and accreditation; and deriving measures to improve medical education through evaluation is required.
Abstract
The purpose of this study aims to analyze research trends related to ‘evaluation’ in Korean medical education through a systematic review. This study used a systematic review method, which is a research methodology for research trends and ‘literature analysis.’ Researchers searched the Korean journal literature published until the end of December 2020 in the Korean research database with keywords related to medicine and evaluation. Thus, 5,205 cases were identified. Based on these data, 143 papers were selected through a logical screening process, requiring 1 month to complete the data search and analysis process. In terms of publications, medical journals overwhelmingly outnumbered nonmedical journals until 2015; however, after 2016, the number of papers published in nonmedical journals increased, and the number of published papers was similar to that of medical journals. In terms of evaluation-related research, research on student and program evaluations has been very active compared to that on accreditation. As the number of evaluation studies has gradually decreased over the past 10 years, preparing a plan to revitalize them in Korean medical education is necessary. Considering that the role of evaluation in education has been emphasized in recent years, research on reestablishing the concept of evaluation; developing evaluation indicators; analyzing the status of student evaluation, program evaluation, and accreditation; and deriving measures to improve medical education through evaluation is required.
참고문헌 (7)
- 권순달, "교육 평가의 오용과 남용", 교육평가연구, 26(4), pp.739~754 (2013), 한국교육평가학회
- 이원석, "프로그램 평가와 가치", 교육평가연구, 29(3), pp.529~542 (2016), 한국교육평가학회
- 홍효정, "의학전문대학원 교육과정 변화와 학업성취도의 관련성 비교 - 기초의학종합평가 해부학 교과목을 중심으로 -", 해부·생물인류학, 29(3), pp.105~112 (2016), 대한체질인류학회[DOI]
- Lee GJ, "Theoretical consideration of objectivism and subjectivism in educational evaluation research. Educational evaluation study", J Edu Eval, 6, pp.155~169 (1993)
- 박혜진, "한국 의학교육에서 성과기반교육에 대한 고찰", 인문사회 21, 11(4), pp.1563~1574 (2020), 인문사회 21
- Cook DJ, "Systematic reviews : synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions", Ann Intern Med, 126, pp.376~380 (1997)
- NECA’s guidance for undertaking systematic reviews and meta-analyses for intervention, "Kim SY", National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, 271~ (2011)