본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

New algorithm to estimate proton beam range for multi-slit prompt-gamma camera

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류원자력공학

초록

The prompt gamma imaging (PGI) technique is considered as one of the most promising approaches to estimate the range of proton beam in the patient and unlock the full potential of proton therapy. In the PGI technique, a dedicated algorithm is required to estimate the range of the proton beam from the prompt gamma (PG) distribution acquired by a PGI system. In the present study, a new range estimation algorithm was developed for a multi-slit prompt-gamma camera, one of PGI systems, to estimate the range of proton beam with high accuracy. The performance of the developed algorithm was evaluated by Monte Carlo simulations for various beam/phantom combinations. Our results generally show that the developed algorithm is very robust, showing very high accuracy and precision for all the cases considered in the present study. The range estimation accuracy of the developed algorithm was 0.5e1.7 mm, which is approximately 1% of beam range, for 1  109 protons. Even for the typical number of protons for a spot (1  108 ), the range estimation accuracy of the developed algorithm was 2.1e4.6 mm and smaller than the range uncertainties and typical safety margin, while that of the existing algorithm was 2.5 e9.6 mm

Abstract

The prompt gamma imaging (PGI) technique is considered as one of the most promising approaches to estimate the range of proton beam in the patient and unlock the full potential of proton therapy. In the PGI technique, a dedicated algorithm is required to estimate the range of the proton beam from the prompt gamma (PG) distribution acquired by a PGI system. In the present study, a new range estimation algorithm was developed for a multi-slit prompt-gamma camera, one of PGI systems, to estimate the range of proton beam with high accuracy. The performance of the developed algorithm was evaluated by Monte Carlo simulations for various beam/phantom combinations. Our results generally show that the developed algorithm is very robust, showing very high accuracy and precision for all the cases considered in the present study. The range estimation accuracy of the developed algorithm was 0.5e1.7 mm, which is approximately 1% of beam range, for 1  109 protons. Even for the typical number of protons for a spot (1  108 ), the range estimation accuracy of the developed algorithm was 2.1e4.6 mm and smaller than the range uncertainties and typical safety margin, while that of the existing algorithm was 2.5 e9.6 mm

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Harald Paganetti, "Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations", Physics in Medicine and Biology, 57(11), pp.R99~R117 (2012), IOP Publishing[DOI]
  2. Sebastian Tattenberg, "Proton range uncertainty reduction benefits for skull base tumors in terms of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) and healthy tissue doses", Medical Physics, 48(9), pp.5356~5366 (2021), Wiley[DOI]
  3. J. Krimmer, "Prompt-gamma monitoring in hadrontherapy: A review", Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 878, pp.58~73 (2018), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  4. F. Stichelbaut, "Verification of the proton beam position in the patient by the detection of prompt gamma rays emission", 39th Meet. Part. Ther. Co-op. Gr, pp.1~5 (2003)
  5. C. H. Min, "Prompt gamma measurements for locating the dose falloffregion in the proton therapy", Appl. Phys. Lett, 89, pp.2~5 (2006)[DOI]
  6. 박종훈, "Multi-slit Prompt-gamma Camera for Locating of Distal Dose Falloff in Proton Therapy", Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 51(5), pp.1406~1416 (2019), 한국원자력학회[DOI]
  7. I. Perali, "Prompt gamma imaging with a slit camera for real-time range control in proton therapy: Experimental validation up to 230 MeV with HICAM and development of a new prototype", 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS, 2012, ~[DOI]
  8. Y. Xie, "Prompt gamma imaging for in vivo range verification of pencil beam scanning proton therapy", Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys, 99, pp.210~218 (2017)[DOI]
  9. Paul Maggi, "Computational model for detector timing effects in Compton-camera based prompt-gamma imaging for proton radiotherapy", Physics in Medicine & Biology, 65(12), pp.125004~ (2020), IOP Publishing[DOI]
  10. Chan Hyeong Kim, "Gamma electron vertex imaging for <i>in-vivo<", i> beam-range measurement in proton therapy: Experimental results, 2018, pp.113(11), 114101~[DOI]
  11. Sung Hun Kim, "Upgrade of gamma electron vertex imaging system for high-performance range verification in pencil beam scanning proton therapy", Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 54(3), pp.1016~1023 (2022), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  12. Antje-Christin Knopf, "In vivo proton range verification: a review", Physics in Medicine and Biology, 58(15), pp.R131~R160 (2013), IOP Publishing[DOI]
  13. Chul Hee Min, "Development of array-type prompt gamma measurement system for<i>in vivo<", i>range verification in proton therapy, 2012, pp.39(4), 2100~2107[DOI]
  14. I. Perali, "Prompt gamma imaging of proton pencil beams at clinical dose rate", Phys. Med. Biol, 59, pp.5849~5871 (2014)[DOI]
  15. S. Agostinelli, "Geant4—a simulation toolkit", Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 506(3), pp.250~303 (2003), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  16. C. H. Kim, "ICRP publication 145 : adult mesh-type reference computational phantoms", Ann. ICRP, 49, pp.13~201 (2020)[DOI]
  17. D. R. White, "ICRU Report 44: tissue substitutes in radiation dosimetry and measurement", J. Int. Comm. Radiat. Units Meas, 23 (1989)
  18. Cern, "Geant4 Reference Physics Lists", ~ (2013)
  19. G. collaboration, "Physics Lists - Use Cases - Reference Physics Lists", ~
  20. M. Pinto, "Assessment of Geant4 prompt-gamma emission yields in the context of proton therapy monitoring", Front. Oncol, 6, pp.1~7 (2016)[DOI]
  21. Sung Hun Kim, "Improvement of Statistics in Proton Beam Range Measurement by Merging Prompt Gamma Distributions: A Preliminary Study", 방사선방어학회지, 44(1), pp.1~7 (2019), 테스트학회[DOI]
  22. L. Nenoff, "Sensitivity of a prompt-gamma slit-camera to detect range shifts for proton treatment verification", Radiother. Oncol, 125, pp.534~540 (2017)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

Tackling range uncertainty in proton therapy: Development and evaluation of a new multi-slit prompt-gamma camera (MSPGC) system구영모, 김성훈, 김찬형, 장세현, 정종휘, 조성구, 조재호, 최세훈한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2023 · 제55권 제9호Strategies to improve the range verification of stochastic origin ensembles for low-count prompt gamma imagingHuang Hsuan-Ming한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2023 · 제55권 제10호Upgrade of gamma electron vertex imaging system for high-performance range verifi cation in pencil beam scanning proton therapy구영모, 김성훈, 김찬형, 정재린, 정종휘, 조광현, 조성구한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2022 · 제54권 제3호Performance prediction of gamma electron vertex imaging (GEVI) system for interfractional range shift detection in spot scanning proton therapy구영모, 김성훈, 김찬형, 정재린, 정종휘한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2022 · 제54권 제6호Experiment of proof-of-principle on prompt gamma-positron emission tomography (PG-PET) system for in-vivo dose distribution verification in proton therapy서희, 민철희, 유세환, 이현철, 천보위, 최현준한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2023 · 제55권 제6호Design of a PG-SPECT for boron concentration monitoring in BNCT at XJTUAtsushi Taketani, Dai Yuqi, Fan Jingjing, Han Zheng, Hu Yaocheng, Jiang Quanxu, Liu Kai, Liu Yongze, Wang Sheng, Yan Mingfei한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2025 · 제57권 제7호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)