본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

쿠빌라이시대 고려·원 도자수용의 변화

The changes of accepting ceramics between the Goryeo and the Yuan in Khubilai [忽必烈] era.

0

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류미술

초록

Since the late 13th century, the period of Yuan Sejo, the Khubilai era (A.D. 1260-1294) is a start of new momentum in the East Asian history and also the history of ceramics. Jin (金) dominated the northern China, and the cultural exchange of Goryeo was activated with the passage through the Southern Sung dynasty. However, after the Khubilai era, due to the transportation development of China, the traditional northern route from Gaegyeong to Liaodong was activated, so that the culture of Yuan would spread through the northern route to the various regions directly. Furthermore, Goryeo surrendered voluntarily to Yuan when Khubilai had contended for the throne, and it gave the cause of the throne to Khubilai. As a result, Khubilai’s ruling that provided an opportunity of transition in the relationship as hostile to peace. Actually, in all History of Goryeo, documents of ceramics exchange as gifts between countries are concentrated in the Khubilai era. Also It tells that the late Goryeo celadon has become unearthed in northern China, such as Hebei, Shanxi, inner Mongolia is associated with the conversion of the era. Though the changes of the style and technology of ceramics did not appear directly, in late 13th century, Khubilai era, it was increasing exchange of ceramics and the new recognition between Goryeo and Mongolia. A vast network of the Yuan was promoting the influx of the Goryeo ceramics in China by land and sea. From the late 13th century to the early 14th century, It increased that the highest quality of Chinese ceramics excavated with the Goryeo ceramics in northern and southern part of China. And It could find many records about kilns of Goryeo since Yuan dynasty, description of assumed inlaid ceramic is repeated. In the cases of relics unearthed in China, most of Goryeo ceramics found in China is inlaid celadon, and also there are a lot of inlaid celadon in relics of the Sinan ship. It infers that there was a certain selection criteria for accepting the Goryeo celadon in China. In addition to inlaid celadon, saped celadon was found in the Jininglu ancient city site and the Sinan ship. It also is different from the domestic consumption trend in comparison with the percentage of production and decorative techniques over relics excavated from kilns of Goryeo. In other hand, Longquan celadons such as the Sinan ocean-bottom relics are hardly found in the Goryeo ruins. It means that accepting ceramics between Goyreo and Yuan was optional which was different from between Goryeo and Japan, or Yuan and Japan. In Gaegyeong or large temples, the Yuan ceramics were found with Goryeo celadon which tend to focus on white porcelain that is associated with the celadon-centric manufacturing condition of the Goryeo dynasty. With Khubilai’s ruling, some upper classes of Yuan had increased a commercial interest in accepting Goryeo celadon, and high tariffs imposed on a trade in the Goryeo celadon in southern region of Zhejiang. Also Goryeo would have a new attempt to Yuan’s taste, such as gold-painted celadon that manufactured by applying paints on glazes.

Abstract

Since the late 13th century, the period of Yuan Sejo, the Khubilai era (A.D. 1260-1294) is a start of new momentum in the East Asian history and also the history of ceramics. Jin (金) dominated the northern China, and the cultural exchange of Goryeo was activated with the passage through the Southern Sung dynasty. However, after the Khubilai era, due to the transportation development of China, the traditional northern route from Gaegyeong to Liaodong was activated, so that the culture of Yuan would spread through the northern route to the various regions directly. Furthermore, Goryeo surrendered voluntarily to Yuan when Khubilai had contended for the throne, and it gave the cause of the throne to Khubilai. As a result, Khubilai’s ruling that provided an opportunity of transition in the relationship as hostile to peace. Actually, in all History of Goryeo, documents of ceramics exchange as gifts between countries are concentrated in the Khubilai era. Also It tells that the late Goryeo celadon has become unearthed in northern China, such as Hebei, Shanxi, inner Mongolia is associated with the conversion of the era. Though the changes of the style and technology of ceramics did not appear directly, in late 13th century, Khubilai era, it was increasing exchange of ceramics and the new recognition between Goryeo and Mongolia. A vast network of the Yuan was promoting the influx of the Goryeo ceramics in China by land and sea. From the late 13th century to the early 14th century, It increased that the highest quality of Chinese ceramics excavated with the Goryeo ceramics in northern and southern part of China. And It could find many records about kilns of Goryeo since Yuan dynasty, description of assumed inlaid ceramic is repeated. In the cases of relics unearthed in China, most of Goryeo ceramics found in China is inlaid celadon, and also there are a lot of inlaid celadon in relics of the Sinan ship. It infers that there was a certain selection criteria for accepting the Goryeo celadon in China. In addition to inlaid celadon, saped celadon was found in the Jininglu ancient city site and the Sinan ship. It also is different from the domestic consumption trend in comparison with the percentage of production and decorative techniques over relics excavated from kilns of Goryeo. In other hand, Longquan celadons such as the Sinan ocean-bottom relics are hardly found in the Goryeo ruins. It means that accepting ceramics between Goyreo and Yuan was optional which was different from between Goryeo and Japan, or Yuan and Japan. In Gaegyeong or large temples, the Yuan ceramics were found with Goryeo celadon which tend to focus on white porcelain that is associated with the celadon-centric manufacturing condition of the Goryeo dynasty. With Khubilai’s ruling, some upper classes of Yuan had increased a commercial interest in accepting Goryeo celadon, and high tariffs imposed on a trade in the Goryeo celadon in southern region of Zhejiang. Also Goryeo would have a new attempt to Yuan’s taste, such as gold-painted celadon that manufactured by applying paints on glazes.

참고문헌 (49)

  1. "高麗史", ~
  2. "東國李相國集", ~
  3. "元史", ~
  4. "元典章", ~
  5. "格古要論", ~
  6. "景德鎭陶錄", ~
  7. "骨董十三說", ~
  8. "古窯器考", ~
  9. 고미경, "신안 해저 출토 용천요 청자 연구", 석사, 美術史學科, pp.2005
  10. 국립해양유물전시관, "신안선과 동아시아 도자교역" (2006)
  11. 金允貞, "高麗後期에서 朝鮮初期 象嵌靑磁에 나타난 元代 磁器의 影響", 석사, pp.2003
  12. 金載悅, "중국으로 건너간 고려자기", 湖巖美術館硏究論文集, (4), pp.16~35 (1999), 호암미술관
  13. 김한규, "요동사" (2004), 문학과 지성사
  14. 김호동, "몽골제국과 고려" (2007), 서울대학교출판부
  15. 김홍남, "梨花女子大學校博物館 소장 扶安 柳川里, 출토 高麗象嵌靑瓷 人物紋의 주제 ‘趙孟? · 管道昇四樂圖’-麗 · 元문화교류의 産物로서", 美術史論壇, 16, pp.7~77 (2003), 한국미술연구소
  16. 藍浦, "역주 경덕진도록" (2004), 일지사
  17. 盧啓鉉, "麗蒙外交史" (1993), 甲寅出版社
  18. 문화재청, "신안선" (2006), 청자·흑유
  19. 백은경, "高麗 象形靑磁 硏究", 석사, pp.2004
  20. 보르지기다이에르데니바타르, "팍스몽골리카와 고려" (2009), 혜안
  21. 李益柱, "高麗 · 元關係의 構造와 高麗後期 政治體制", 박사, pp.1996
  22. 이종민, "고려시대 청자매병 연구", 강좌미술사, (27), pp.157~190 (2006), 한국불교미술사학회
  23. 이희수, "중국 광저우(廣州)에서 발견된 고려인 라마단 비문에 대한 한 해석", 한국이슬람학회논총, 17(1), pp.63~80 (2007), 한국이슬람학회
  24. 장남원, "10~12세기 고려와 遼ㆍ金도자의 교류", 미술사학, 23, pp.171~203 (2009), 한국미술사교육학회
  25. 장남원, "중국 元代유적 출토 고려청자의 제작시기 검토", 역사와 담론, (48), pp.309~339 (2007), 호서사학회
  26. 장남원, "宋代明州地方志에수록된高麗關係記事硏究", 역사교육논문집, 22 (1997), 역사교육학회
  27. 張東翼, "元代歷史資料集成" (1997), 서울대학교출판부
  28. 정요근, "고려 역로망 운영에 대한 원(元)의 개입과 그 의미", 역사와 현실, (64), pp.161~195 (2007), 한국역사연구회
  29. 秦大樹, "宋 · 金代 북방지역 瓷器의 象嵌工藝와 高麗 象嵌靑瓷의 關係", 美術史論壇, 7, pp.45~76 (1998), 한국미술연구소
  30. 崔健, "中國 元代墓 出土 靑瓷象嵌牧丹雲鶴紋梅甁", 古美術, 43, pp.3~37 (1997), 한국고미술협회
  31. 최응천, "고려후기의 금속공예", 강좌미술사, (22), pp.125~156 (2004), 한국불교미술사학회
  32. 韓盛旭, "高麗後期靑瓷の硏究", 박사, pp.2006
  33. 黃鉉盛, "韓 · 中 陶瓷의 金彩技法에 관한 科學的 調査, in 中國陶磁", pp.440~449 (2007), 국립중앙박물관
  34. 耿맥昌, "閑話朝鮮高麗靑瓷, in 博物館硏究", pp.91~94 (1985), 吉林省博物館
  35. 內蒙古自治區文物考古硏究所, "內蒙古集寧路古城遺址出土瓷器" (2004), 文物出版社
  36. 劉毅, "集寧路元代⑪藏出土的龜形硯滴與高麗瓷斷代", 內蒙古自治區出土遼金元瓷器國際學術硏討會 (2005), 中國古陶瓷學會編印
  37. 陸明華, "略談上海博物館所藏高麗瓷, in 文物" (1988), 文物出版社
  38. 陸明華, "對元集寧路出土瓷器的初步認識", 中國古陶瓷硏究, 11 (2005), 紫禁城出版社
  39. 葉英挺, "發現…大明處州龍泉官窯" (2005), 西굳印社出版社
  40. 丁麗, "遼陽出土的高麗靑瓷" (1994), 遼寧省博物館
  41. "中國出土瓷器全集" (2008), 科學出版社
  42. 馮先銘, "中國古代陶瓷論文集" (1987), 紫禁城出版社
  43. 浙江省輕工業廳, "龍泉靑瓷硏究" (1989), 文物出版社
  44. 浙江省文物考古硏究所, "龍泉東區窯址發掘報告" (2005), 文物出版社
  45. 朱伯謙, "龍泉窯靑瓷" (1998), 藝術家出版社
  46. 河北省文物硏究所, "石家莊市后太保元代史氏墓群發掘簡報, in 文物" (1996), 文物出版社
  47. 高正龍, "京都出土の高麗象嵌方枕について", 京都埋藏文化財硏究所硏究紀要, (2), pp.127~144 (1995), 京都市埋葬化財硏究所
  48. 縣町敎育委員會, "大石原遺蹟, 上縣町文化財調査報告書 第1集" (1995)
  49. "沖縄縣首里城京·沖縄縣立埋藏文化財せんた, 『首里城京の內展』", ~ (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)