본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

고려전기 해무리굽[옥벽저계] 碗의 지속현상에 대한 추론 ―동아시아 북방도자와의 관련성을 중심으로―

Inference upon the continuous presentation of Yübi-di styled bowls in the early Goryeo Dynasty ―As for the relations with the East Asian Northern ceramic wares

0

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

This paper is to deduce the reason why chinese styled, Yübi-di styled bowls, were excavated in kilns of the early Goryeo Dynasty. So far, it has been studied upon the relations with the ceramic industry in the southern as well as the northern China in the matter of the link with the production of early Korean ceramics. In particular, there is the strong evidence that new techniques were introduced for producing porcelains that was revealed through the period when they were produced in the Korean Peninsula at first, the thing that white porcelains, in different condition, were seen at the same time as well as presentation of Yübi-di styled bowls in Korea, which had been disappeared in the southern China. The period that Yübi-di styled bowls in BangSang-dong kiln and Suh-ri kiln where white porcelains as well as celadons were made were presented is similar with that of introduction of white porcelains in Korea. The reason is to be found at this study upon the relations with the ceramic industry of Liao Dynasty such as Chi-feng Gang-wa -Yao and Lin-Dong Yao. That is to say, when Liao Dynasty was dominated in the northern China and white porcelains were mainly used and produced, the northern styled white porcelains in Liao Dynasty was mostly presented with the techniques of Xing-Yao style, strongly influenced by Ding-Yao and Yübi-di style. Since 939 when Goryeo and Liao Dynasty had been closely connected, the representation upon the tradition of Yübi-di styled bowls had been likely due to link the previous Yuè Yao styled porcelains and the white porcelains or the northern ceramists. It has been known that since the request for sending reinforcements by Liao Dyansty in 1029 was refused by Goryeo Dynasty, the trade had been isolated. Therefore, Yübi-di styled bowls adopted from the northern China in the late 10th and the early 11th centuries had changed in its own ways. In short, It has been shown that the original forms and styles were kept well in Korean more than China which had had many changes since then. That is to say, Yübi-di styled bowls has kept its tradition only in Korea of the North East Asia in spite of the differences upon its size and proportion, which was disappeared in China and was yet vividly produced in Yo dynasty. Therefore, it is shown that Yübi-di styled bowls had been popular for a while. Yübi-di styled bowls white porcelains and celadons were excavated in Hye Eum Won with the traditional Gang Jin and Bu-An styled celadons in the early 12th century. Furthermore, they were discovered as well in the kiln in Moo Nae-ri in An Yang where local porcelains were produced in the middle Goryeo Dynasy. In addition, Yübi-di styled bowls in Gwang Xi and An Hui besides white porcelains in the northern China had been likely to be produced even in Sung Dynasty.

Abstract

This paper is to deduce the reason why chinese styled, Yübi-di styled bowls, were excavated in kilns of the early Goryeo Dynasty. So far, it has been studied upon the relations with the ceramic industry in the southern as well as the northern China in the matter of the link with the production of early Korean ceramics. In particular, there is the strong evidence that new techniques were introduced for producing porcelains that was revealed through the period when they were produced in the Korean Peninsula at first, the thing that white porcelains, in different condition, were seen at the same time as well as presentation of Yübi-di styled bowls in Korea, which had been disappeared in the southern China. The period that Yübi-di styled bowls in BangSang-dong kiln and Suh-ri kiln where white porcelains as well as celadons were made were presented is similar with that of introduction of white porcelains in Korea. The reason is to be found at this study upon the relations with the ceramic industry of Liao Dynasty such as Chi-feng Gang-wa -Yao and Lin-Dong Yao. That is to say, when Liao Dynasty was dominated in the northern China and white porcelains were mainly used and produced, the northern styled white porcelains in Liao Dynasty was mostly presented with the techniques of Xing-Yao style, strongly influenced by Ding-Yao and Yübi-di style. Since 939 when Goryeo and Liao Dynasty had been closely connected, the representation upon the tradition of Yübi-di styled bowls had been likely due to link the previous Yuè Yao styled porcelains and the white porcelains or the northern ceramists. It has been known that since the request for sending reinforcements by Liao Dyansty in 1029 was refused by Goryeo Dynasty, the trade had been isolated. Therefore, Yübi-di styled bowls adopted from the northern China in the late 10th and the early 11th centuries had changed in its own ways. In short, It has been shown that the original forms and styles were kept well in Korean more than China which had had many changes since then. That is to say, Yübi-di styled bowls has kept its tradition only in Korea of the North East Asia in spite of the differences upon its size and proportion, which was disappeared in China and was yet vividly produced in Yo dynasty. Therefore, it is shown that Yübi-di styled bowls had been popular for a while. Yübi-di styled bowls white porcelains and celadons were excavated in Hye Eum Won with the traditional Gang Jin and Bu-An styled celadons in the early 12th century. Furthermore, they were discovered as well in the kiln in Moo Nae-ri in An Yang where local porcelains were produced in the middle Goryeo Dynasy. In addition, Yübi-di styled bowls in Gwang Xi and An Hui besides white porcelains in the northern China had been likely to be produced even in Sung Dynasty.

참고문헌 (58)

  1. 최건, "청자요지의 계보와 전개", 미술사연구, 12, pp.3~20 (1998), 미술사연구회
  2. 이희관, "고려초기 청자생산체제의 변동과 그 배경", 미술사학연구, 232, pp.21~55 (2001), 한국미술사학회
  3. 최건, "라말여초 한국자기의 계열과 변천―특히, 9~10세기 자기의 흥망성쇠를 중심으로―", 제2회 용인시사학술대회 용인서리 고려백자요지의 재조명 발표논문집, pp.47~56 (2000), 용인시․용인문화원
  4. 李鍾玟, "시흥 방산동 초기청자 요지 출토품을 통해 본 중부지역 전축요의 운영시기", 미술사학연구, 228․229, pp.65~97 (2001), 한국미술사학회
  5. 李喜寬, "韓國 初期靑磁에 있어서 해무리굽碗 問題의 再檢討 ―韓國 靑磁製作의 開始時期問題의 解決을 위하여―", 미술사학연구, 237 (2003), 한국미술사학회
  6. 강경숙, "고려전기 도자의 대중교섭, In 高麗 美術의 對外交涉", pp.193~248 (2004), 예경
  7. 장남원, "고려중기 청자 연구", pp.58~ (2006), 혜안
  8. 정신옥, "11세기 말-12세기 전반 高麗靑瓷에 보이는 中國陶瓷의 영향", 미술사학, 21, pp.41~85 (2007), 한국미술사교육학회
  9. 안귀숙, "고려시대 金屬工藝의 대외교섭, In 고려미술의 대외교섭" (2004), 예경
  10. 宿白, "定州工藝與靜志, 淨衆兩塔地宮文物", 文物, 10, pp.36~47 (1997), 文物出版社
  11. 任眞娥, "高麗靑磁에 보이는 北宋, 遼代 磁器의 影響", 미술사학과, pp.2005
  12. 徐兢, "高麗圖經 第19卷", 「民庶」, <工技>條, ~
  13. "高麗史, 卷13", 世家13, 睿宗12年 8月 戊午, ~
  14. 최혜숙, "高麗時代 南京硏究", pp.107~ (2004), 景仁文化社
  15. 樂承耀, "寧波古代史綱", pp.139~140 (1999), 寧波出版社
  16. 김한규, "요동사", pp.450~457 (2004), 문학과 지성사
  17. 안주섭, "고려 거란전쟁" (2003), 경인문화사
  18. 蘇軾, "蘇東坡全集 奏議集8", ~
  19. 劉濤, "宋遼金紀年瓷器" (2004), 文物出版社
  20. "芳山大窯", 海剛陶磁美術館․京畿道始興市, ~ (2001)
  21. 龍仁西里白磁窯 發掘調査報告書Ⅱ, , 湖巖美術館, ~ (2003)
  22. 용인 이동 서리상반 고려백자요지 발굴조사 지도위원회자료, , 기전문화재연구원, ~ (2001)
  23. 용인 서리상반 고려백자요지 2차발굴조사 지도위원회자료, , 畿甸文化財硏究院, ~ (2003)
  24. 용인 서리상반 고려백자요지 3차발굴조사 지도위원회 자료, , 畿甸文化財硏究院, ~ (2004)
  25. 京畿道博物館, "驪州 中岩里 高麗白瓷窯址", 경기도박물관, ~ (2004)
  26. 장남원, "高麗時代 京畿地域 窯業의 性格", 고문화, (63), pp.83~108 (2004), 한국대학박물관협회
  27. "한국의 청자요지" (1992), 韓國情神文化硏究院
  28. 朴宗基, "京畿 北部地域 中世 郡縣 治所와 特殊村落 變化硏究", 北岳史學, 8, pp.144~149 (2001), 北岳史學會
  29. 全榮京, "楊州 釜谷里 靑磁碗 硏究", 석사, pp.1993
  30. 김영진, "황해남도 봉천군 원산리 청자기가마터 발굴간략보고", 조선고고연구, (2), pp.2~9 (1991), 사회과학출판사
  31. 조선유적유물도감편찬위원회, "봉천군 원산리 자기가마터, In 조선유적유물도감 12", pp.306~321 (1992), 평양
  32. 김영진, "도자기가마터발굴보고" (2002), 사회과학출판사
  33. 鄭良謨, "韓國의 陶磁器", pp.320~323 (1992), 文藝出版社
  34. 시흥군지편찬위원회, "始興郡誌", pp.55~580, 시흥군
  35. 康津龍雲里靑磁窯址發掘調査報告書 圖版編, , 國立中央博物館, ~ (1996)
  36. 康津龍雲里靑磁窯址發掘調査報告書 本文編, , 國立中央博物館, ~ (1997)
  37. "康津 三興里窯址Ⅰ" (2004), 湖南文化財硏究院
  38. "康津 三興里窯址 Ⅱ" (2004), 國立光州博物館
  39. 全南地方陶窯址 調査報告(Ⅲ)-고흥 운대리, , 國立光州博物館, ~ (1991)
  40. 海南 新德里 靑磁陶窯址 精密地表調査 報告書, , 國立光州博物館, ~ (2000)
  41. 高敞雅山댐水沒地區發掘調査報告書, , 圓光大學校 馬韓百濟文化硏究所, ~ (1985)
  42. 仁川 景西洞 綠靑磁 窯址, "정양모", 國立中央博物館․仁川市立博物館, ~ (1990)
  43. 김구군, "大邱近郊의 初期靑磁窯址에 대하여, In 벽돌가마와 초기청자" (2000), 해강도자미술관
  44. 이종민, "고려 초기청자 연구" (2004), 백산자료원
  45. 路菁, "遼代陶瓷" (2003), 遼寧畵報出版社
  46. 용인 서리 고려백자요지 도편분석 연구보고서, "용인시", ~ (2004)
  47. 金英美, "越窯硏究", 박사, pp.2002
  48. "浙江紀年瓷" (2000), 文物出版社
  49. 弓場紀知, "遼上京府林東窯址再檢討", 出光美術館硏究紀要第, (6), pp.115~146 (2000)
  50. 田村實造, "慶陵" (1953), 京都大學文學部
  51. 陳小波, "廣西桂平古窯址調査, In 中國古代窯址調査發掘報告集", pp.195~200 (1984), 文物出版社
  52. 楊文山, "論宋金時期邢窯白瓷的持續生産, In 邢窯遺址硏究", pp.330~340 (2007), 科學出版社
  53. 河北省文物硏究所, "臨城山下金代瓷窯遺址試掘簡報, In 邢窯硏究", pp.55~63 (2007), 文物出版社
  54. 王應麟, "玉海 154", 朝貢 獻方物, ~
  55. 파주 혜음원지 발굴조사보고서―1차~4차, "단국대학교 매장문화재연구소", ~ (2006)
  56. 姜京男, "坡州 惠陰院址 出土 高麗靑磁 硏究-편년과 성격을 중심으로-", 문화사학, (21), pp.741~764 (2004), 한국문화사학회
  57. 연세대학교박물관, "고려시대 질그릇", 10~11 (1991)
  58. 張起熏, "窯道具를 통해 본 初期靑磁 窯業의 變遷", 미술사연구, (16), pp.229~254 (2002), 미술사연구회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)