헌법상 행복추구권과 성년후견제도에 관한 연구
A Study on the Constitutional Right to Pursue Happiness and the Adult Guardianship System
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The adult guardianship system in Korea shall be implemented from July 1,2013. The purpose of this study is to find out a meaning of the adult guardianship system from the perspective of the constitutional right to pursue happiness and to examine the emergence of this system and principles of practice, the main contents. Based on this, this study proposes a preparations to implement of this system. As a study result, It was examined that the adult guardianship system has a character of social security as the constitutional right to pursue happiness. And the following contents are required : specific standards for guardians and guardianship director, a procedures on how to apply this system for a ward,standards of think reflects for a ward, prescripts to necessary for the guardian education and management, solutions to problems of cost due to the use of the system.
Abstract
The adult guardianship system in Korea shall be implemented from July 1,2013. The purpose of this study is to find out a meaning of the adult guardianship system from the perspective of the constitutional right to pursue happiness and to examine the emergence of this system and principles of practice, the main contents. Based on this, this study proposes a preparations to implement of this system. As a study result, It was examined that the adult guardianship system has a character of social security as the constitutional right to pursue happiness. And the following contents are required : specific standards for guardians and guardianship director, a procedures on how to apply this system for a ward,standards of think reflects for a ward, prescripts to necessary for the guardian education and management, solutions to problems of cost due to the use of the system.
참고문헌 (28)
- 김선택, "“행복추구권”과 “헌법에 열거되지 아니한 권리”의 기본권체계적 해석", 안암법학, (1) (1993)
- 김영수, "일반적 자유권으로서의 행복추구권", 헌법학연구, 7(1) (2001)
- 김철수, "인간의 존엄과 가치 행복추구권", 사법서사, (8) (1982)
- 김형석, "민법 개정안에 따른 성년후견법제", 가족법연구, 24(2), pp.111~166 (2010), 한국가족법학회
- "경기일보", ~ (2012)
- 박정선, "성년후견제도와 사회적 책임", 한국장애인복지학, (16), pp.155~170 (2011), 한국장애인복지학회
- 백윤철, "헌법학" (2012), 한국학술정보원
- 백윤철, "개인정보보호법" (2012), 한국학술정보원
- 백승흠, "민법개정안의 성년후견제도와 피후견인의 신상보호", 법학논고, (35), pp.53~80 (2011), 법학연구원
- "보건복지부 내부자료", ~ (2012)
- 성낙인, "인간의 존엄과 가치 및 행복추구권, 판례헌법" (2012), 법문사
- 성락인, "헌법학" (2012), 法文社
- 신권철, "성년후견제도의 도입과 법원의 역할", 사법, 1(14), pp.3~38 (2010), 사법발전재단
- 성년후견인 및 후견감독인의 직무 범위 등에 관한 연구, "우주형", 법무부, ~ (2009)
- 윤찬영, "성년후견제 도입에 따른 사회복지실천의 과제", 라이브 쟁점 이슈 토론 (2012), 한국사회복지학회
- 이정식, "성년 후견제도와 인간존엄성의 보장", 세계헌법연구, 16(2), pp.335~366 (2010), 세계헌법학회한국학회
- 장석권, "인간으로서의 존엄과 가치⋅행복추구권", 법학논총, 12 (1982)
- 제철웅, "성년후견제도의 개정방향", 민사법학, (42), pp.111~149 (2008), 한국민사법학회
- 최윤영, "사회복지적 관점의 성년후견제 도입 의미와 과제", 한국사회복지교육, 17(17), pp.97~121 (2012), 한국사회복지교육협의회
- 현소혜, "성년후견제도 도입에 따른 관계법령의 개선방안 —특히 결격조항의 정비를 중심으로—", 가족법연구, 25(3), pp.143~184 (2011), 한국가족법학회
- 홍성방, "행복추구권 : 특히 그 법적 성격과 내용을 중심으로 홍성방", 헌법학연구, 5(2) (1999)
- 紺野包子, "2010年成年後見法世界會議槪說", 成年後見, (36) (2012), 民事法硏究會
- 新井誠, "イギリスとドイツにおける成年後見法の新たな展開", ジュリスト, (972) (1991), 有斐閣
- 菅富美枝, "イギリスの成年後見制度にみる裁判所の役割-法定後見をめ ぐる最近の決定akら", 成年後見, (10) (2012), 民事法硏究會
- "イギリス成年後見ハンドブック : 能力判定の手引き", British Medical Association and The Law Society 勁草書房, ~ (2005)
- 中山泰道, "イギリス成年後見法改正の動向", 成年後見法硏究, (2) (2005), 民事法硏究會
- 黑田美亞紀, "-ストリアの成年後見制度", 成年後見法制の展望 (2012), 評論社
- 西原留美子, "デンゼル⋅ラッシュ ｢成年後見手續とメディア｣傍聽記", 成年後見, (36) (2012), 民事法硏究會