高齡化 社會에서의 成年後見에 관한 硏究
A Study on the Guardianship for Adults in the Aging Society
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Korean Civil Law system needs a newly revised guardianship regime for adults in light of its legal background, title, standards, and so on. Particularly, the new guardianship regime for adults, in respect of their own personalities, should be improved to guarantee the right of self-determination, make full use of residual abilities and realize one's life. In addition, a new regime should be introduced to protect the aged more thoroughly. In this paper, I propose that the new guardianship regime for adults, based on pluralism, be classified into two types of guardianship for adults and complement to them, but the former apply to the non compos mentis while the latter to the mentally and physically handicapped persons lacking in judgment. However, I think it would be better to revise the present provisions regarding the incompetents in Civil Law, rather than enact another new one. Additionally, public announcement in the new regime should be entered only in the part of personal information register of the existing family relations register in order to prevent its abuse. To conclude, it is desirable to introduce and enforce the new guardianship regime after fulfilling all the conditions necessary for the operation of the regime, such as proper organization, enough funds and relevant procedure. In particular, in my opinion, the guardianship in the aging society should focus on the protection of the aged more thoroughly. To accomplish this purpose of the regime, it is indispensable to cultivate guardians for the adults more systematically with political consideration and concern at national level.
Abstract
Korean Civil Law system needs a newly revised guardianship regime for adults in light of its legal background, title, standards, and so on. Particularly, the new guardianship regime for adults, in respect of their own personalities, should be improved to guarantee the right of self-determination, make full use of residual abilities and realize one's life. In addition, a new regime should be introduced to protect the aged more thoroughly. In this paper, I propose that the new guardianship regime for adults, based on pluralism, be classified into two types of guardianship for adults and complement to them, but the former apply to the non compos mentis while the latter to the mentally and physically handicapped persons lacking in judgment. However, I think it would be better to revise the present provisions regarding the incompetents in Civil Law, rather than enact another new one. Additionally, public announcement in the new regime should be entered only in the part of personal information register of the existing family relations register in order to prevent its abuse. To conclude, it is desirable to introduce and enforce the new guardianship regime after fulfilling all the conditions necessary for the operation of the regime, such as proper organization, enough funds and relevant procedure. In particular, in my opinion, the guardianship in the aging society should focus on the protection of the aged more thoroughly. To accomplish this purpose of the regime, it is indispensable to cultivate guardians for the adults more systematically with political consideration and concern at national level.
참고문헌 (34)
- 姜台星, "民法總則의 改正論" (2008), 대명출판사
- 郭潤直, "民法總則" (2000), 博英社
- 金基善, "韓國民法總則" (1985), 法文社
- 김두섭, "한국 인구의 성장과 다양성" (2006), 한양대학교 인구 및 고령사회 연구소
- 金疇洙, "親族ㆍ相續法" (2004), 法文社
- 박석돈, "사회복지법제론" (2007), 삼영사
- 백승흠, "성년후견제도론" (2005), 푸른세상
- 법원행정처, "가족관계의등록등에 관한 법률 해설" (2008), 법원행정처
- 보건복지부, "보건복지백서" (2006), 보건복지부
- 성년후견제도연구회, "성년후견제도연구" (2007), 사법연구지원재단
- 宋德洙, "新民法講義" (2008), 博英社
- 인구및고령사회연구소, "인구와 사회(1권1호 내지 4권1호), 한양대학교 인구 및 고령사회 연구소, 2005~2008", ~ (2005)
- 한국법제연구원, "고령사회와 성년후견제도" (2003), 고령사회법제워크샵
- 한림대학교법학연구소, "고령사회에 대비한 법정책 과제" (2007), 한림대학교법학연구소
- 田山輝明, "成年後見制度の 硏究(上卷)" (2001), 成文堂
- 田山輝明, "成年後見制度の 硏究(下卷)" (2001), 成文堂
- 新井誠, "高齡社會の 成年後見法" (2000), 有斐閣
- 原司, "新成年後見制度の 解說" (2003), 金融財政事情硏究會
- 立山龍彦, "高齡化社會の 法的側面" (1995), 東海大學出版會
- 池田直樹, "高齡者 虐待對?の 法律と 實務" (2007), 學陽書房
- 森田明, "未成年者 保護法と 現代社會" (2007), 有斐閣
- 森田明, "未成年者 保護法と 現代社會(第2版)" (2008), 有斐閣
- 深谷松男, "現代家族法" (2002), 責林書院
- 權純漢, "법정후견제도", 아세아여성법학, (3) (2000), 아세아여성법학연구소
- 김선이, "독일의 성년후견법 in : 고령사회와 성년후견제도" (2003), 한국법제연구원
- 백승흠, "우리나라에서의 성년후견제도의 도입과 그 검토 in: 고령사회와 성년후견제도" (2003), 한국법제연구원
- 宋鎬烈, "高齡化 社會에 비추어 본 行爲無能力制度의 問題點과 後見制度", 財産法硏究, 23(2) (2006), 韓國財産法學會
- 李銀榮, "成年後見制度에 관한 立法 提案" (2002), 韓日法學
- 李銀榮, "성년후견에 관한 법률안, 의안4771호, 2006.8.28", ~ (2006)
- 張賢玉, "우리나라 후견제도의 문제점", 아세아여성법학, (3) (2000), 아세아여성법학연구소
- 車興奉, "저출산ㆍ고령화의 전망과 노인에 관한 사회복지법제의 과제 in: 고령사회에 대비한 법정책적 과제" (2007), 한림대학교법학연구소
- 최금숙, "일본법상의 성년후견제도 in: 고령사회와 성년후견제도" (2003), 한국법제연구원
- 홍춘의, "프랑스의 성년후견제도 in: 고령사회와 성년후견제도" (2003), 한국법제연구원
- 床谷文雄, "高齡者 法制의 一素描 in: 고령사회에 대비한 법정책적 과제" (2007), 한림대학교법학연구소
