후견법원의 설치 및 그 방안에 관한 고찰
A study on the planning of establishment of guardianship court in Korea
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The adult guardianship system was introduced into Korean civil code in 2011 and will be put into force in July 2013. It is necessary for us to discuss how a so-called guardianship court which deals with matter of adult guardianship is designed for it in Korean judicial system. There can be three kinds of court which will be able to be proposed. One is the adult guardianship court which is separated from family court and established through the country, another a guardianship division in family court which is established in the every corner of the country, the third a family division in the court of ordinary. I believe that among them the third one is a practical one as the situation now stands. However we must note that the detailed judicial processes for the matter of adult guardianship is much more valuable than the organization of a kind of court for that.
Abstract
The adult guardianship system was introduced into Korean civil code in 2011 and will be put into force in July 2013. It is necessary for us to discuss how a so-called guardianship court which deals with matter of adult guardianship is designed for it in Korean judicial system. There can be three kinds of court which will be able to be proposed. One is the adult guardianship court which is separated from family court and established through the country, another a guardianship division in family court which is established in the every corner of the country, the third a family division in the court of ordinary. I believe that among them the third one is a practical one as the situation now stands. However we must note that the detailed judicial processes for the matter of adult guardianship is much more valuable than the organization of a kind of court for that.
참고문헌 (28)
- Manfred Helbich, "Freiwillige Gerichtsbarkeit" (1990), Vahlen
- Bumiller, "Freiwillige Gerichtsbarkeit" (1990), C.H.Beck
- Bumiller, "FamFG Freiwillige Gerichtsbarkeit" (2009), C.H.Beck
- Mary Kay Kane, "Civil Procedure in a nutshell(5th)" (2003)
- Friednethal, "Civil Procedure, 4th" (2005)
- ジムニ―, "編譯(社)日本社會福祉士會, アメリカ成年後見ハンドブック" (2002), 勁草書房
- 赤沼康弘, "日本の成年後見における最近の動向", 成年後見法制硏究, (5), pp.87~, 日本成年後見法學會
- 성년후견제도연구회, "성년후견제도" (2007), 사법연구지원재단
- 김상규, "가정법원의 장기적 발전방향-인적․물적 구성을 중심으로", 실무연구, (10), pp.749~ (2005)
- 김상규, "가정법원의 새로운 역할과 운영개선의 필요성", 판자료, 112, pp.211~ (2007)
- 김상용, "독일가정법원의 기능과 역할", 가족법연구, 22(3), pp.105~150 (2008), 한국가족법학회
- 개관, "민사소송", 2009, 622~651, pp.한국민사소송법학회
- 김원태, "일본에서의 가정법원의 역할과 기능", 가족법연구, 22(3), pp.67~104 (2008), 한국가족법학회
- 반흥식, "독일 가사 및 비송사건절차법의 내용과 구조 – 비송사건을 중심으로 –", 민사소송, 15(1), pp.44~81 (2011), 한국민사소송법학회
- 선재성, "가사소송에서의 신모델의 향후 과제", 재판자료, 106, pp.293~ (2005)
- 문준필, "가사소송절차의 문제점과 개선방향", 가족법연구, 18(2), pp.259~288 (2004), 한국가족법학회
- 배금자, "이혼소송에서의 문제점", 시민과 변호사, (118), pp.42~ (2003)
- 박동섭, "가사소송의 몇 가지 문제점", 인권과 정의, (246) (1997)
- 신권철, "성년후견제도의 도입과 법원의 역할", 사법, 1(14), pp.3~38 (2010), 사법발전재단
- 양정자, "가정법원의 현황과 발전방향", 가족법연구, (14), pp.711~ (2000)
- 윤진수, "美國 家庭法院의 現況과 改善 論議", 가족법연구, 22(3), pp.151~204 (2008), 한국가족법학회
- 이유정, "가정법원의 문제점과 개선방안", 가족법연구, 22(3), pp.1~66 (2008), 한국가족법학회
- 이호윤, "가정법원의 발전방향에 관하여", 민사소송, 11(2), pp.11~ (2007), 한국민사소송법학회
- 김명중, "일본의 성년후견제도의 동향과 과제", 제노동브리프, 8(6), pp.64~ (2010)
- 사법지원연구재단, "성년후견제도 도입이 소송절차에 미치는 영향", 성년후견연구, pp.393~ (2007)
- 박인환, "새로운 성년후견제 도입을 위한 민법개정안의 검토", 가족법연구, 24(1), pp.31~74 (2010), 한국가족법학회
- 김형석, "민법 개정안에 따른 성년후견법제", 가족법연구, 24(2), pp.111~166 (2010), 한국가족법학회
- "사법연감, 2007, 2010" (2007)