본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

3.1 독립운동 이후에 있어서의 일본의 법적용과 식민지법제의 변화

The Changes in Legal Application by Japan and Colonial Legal System after 3.1 Independence Movement

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Main policy of colonial rule by Japan in Korea were suppression for exploitation, obliteration of national characteristics for permanent subjugation and obscurant policy constantly, although it’s been changed according to the periodical situation more or less. The formal concept of rule of law has been the most important menas of colonialism. The colonial law as effective ruling measure has been revealed in various features according to circumstances of times which means national movement and change of colonial policy following economic aspects all through Japanese colonial era. After 3.1 revolutionary announcing ‘Declaration of Independence’, Japanese colonial government has changed its basic domination agenda from ‘government by the bayonet’, so called ‘an iron rule’ to ‘government by the police’, so called ‘a cultural rule’. Nevertheless, keynote of colonialism has not been changed at all, because it’s just been transformed into ‘Devide and Rule’ which stands for deceived colonialism by imperialist countries at that times. That means the basic features of legal system by Japanese colonial government has maintained its original standpoints. Rather the colonial law has forced to eradicate our nation’s language and customs, abolish political and civil rights and discriminate against people governed. This distorted legal system by formalism of the rule of law has influenced on Korean people negatively. Therefore, it’s been burdensome of our government to select and eliminate factors of anti-constitutionalism among our modern legal system after liberation. The history of establishing constitutionalism in modern times of Korea represents process of solving dual problems assigned by Japan and other countries in the occupation era.

Abstract

Main policy of colonial rule by Japan in Korea were suppression for exploitation, obliteration of national characteristics for permanent subjugation and obscurant policy constantly, although it’s been changed according to the periodical situation more or less. The formal concept of rule of law has been the most important menas of colonialism. The colonial law as effective ruling measure has been revealed in various features according to circumstances of times which means national movement and change of colonial policy following economic aspects all through Japanese colonial era. After 3.1 revolutionary announcing ‘Declaration of Independence’, Japanese colonial government has changed its basic domination agenda from ‘government by the bayonet’, so called ‘an iron rule’ to ‘government by the police’, so called ‘a cultural rule’. Nevertheless, keynote of colonialism has not been changed at all, because it’s just been transformed into ‘Devide and Rule’ which stands for deceived colonialism by imperialist countries at that times. That means the basic features of legal system by Japanese colonial government has maintained its original standpoints. Rather the colonial law has forced to eradicate our nation’s language and customs, abolish political and civil rights and discriminate against people governed. This distorted legal system by formalism of the rule of law has influenced on Korean people negatively. Therefore, it’s been burdensome of our government to select and eliminate factors of anti-constitutionalism among our modern legal system after liberation. The history of establishing constitutionalism in modern times of Korea represents process of solving dual problems assigned by Japan and other countries in the occupation era.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. 강경선, "법제사" (2000), 한국방송통신대학교 출판부
  2. 강동진, "일제의 한국침략정책사" (1980), 한길사
  3. 김상용, "-한국법사 중심-법사와 법정책" (2006), 한국법제연구원
  4. 김운태, "일본제국주의의 한국통치" (1998), 박영사
  5. 김철수, "한국헌법사" (1990), 대학출판사
  6. 농지개혁사편찬위원회, "농지개혁사연구" (1970), 한국농촌경제연구원
  7. 박병호, "근세의 법과 법사상" (1996), 도서출판 진원
  8. 연정열, "한국법제사" (1996), 학문사
  9. 鈴木敬夫, "법을 통한 식민지 지배 연구" (1989), 고려대학교 민족문화연구소
  10. 이승일, "조선총독부 법제 정책" (2008), 역사비평사
  11. 이정규, "한국법제사" (1996), 국학자료원
  12. 전봉덕, "한국근대법사상사" (1981), 박영사
  13. 정긍식, "한국근대법사고" (2002), 박영사
  14. 조선총독부, "조선법령집람" (1940)
  15. 최종고, "한국의 서양법수용사" (1982), 박영사
  16. 최종고, "법학사" (1986), 경세원
  17. 최종고, "한국법사상사" (1989), 서울대학교 출판부
  18. 한상법, "한국의 법문화와 일본제국주의의 잔재" (1994), 교육과학사
  19. 김용욱, "일제에 의한 가족법제의 왜곡과 청산", 법사학연구, (16) (1995)
  20. 김창록, "일본제국주의의 헌법사상과 식민지 조선", 법사학연구, (14) (1993)
  21. 김창록, "일본에서의 서양헌법사상의 수용에 관한 연구-"대일본제국 헌법"의 제정에서"일본국헌법"의 출현까지", 박사, pp.1994
  22. 김창록, "식민지 피지배기 법제의 기초", 법제연구, (8) (1995)
  23. 김창록, "한국법의 역사적 형성, in 한국법의 이해" (1996), 두성사
  24. 三谷博, "막다른 골목으로부터의 탈출: 적극적 개국을 향한 전환, in 동아시아 개항을 보는 제3의 눈" (2010), 인하대학교 출판부
  25. 신동운, "일제하 형사절차에 관한 연구in: 한국법사학논총" (1991), 박영사
  26. 심희기, "일제강점 초기 ‘식민지관습법’의 형성", 법사학연구, (28), pp.5~29 (2003), 한국법사학회
  27. 윤대성, "일제의 관습조사사업과 전세관습법 in:한국법사학논총" (1991), 박 영사
  28. 이상욱, "일제하 전통가족법의 왜곡", 한국법사학논총" (1991), 박영사
  29. 이승일, "일제의 관습조사사업과 식민지 ‘관습법’의 성격", 역사민속학, 17 (2003), 한국역사민속학회
  30. 이철우, "토지조사사업과 토지소유법제의 변천 in 한국법사학논총" (1991), 박영사
  31. 일제의 관습조사의 의의, "정긍식", 한국법제연구원, ~ (1992)
  32. 최종고, "법의식과 법생황에 있어 일제유산의 극복", 법사학연구, (16) (1995), 법사학회
  33. 한인섭, "치안유지법과 식민지 통제법령의 전개 in 한국법사학논총" (1991), 박영사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)