본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일제의 실증주의법에 저항한 우리 민중의 자연법 사상과 그 실천-자연법 사상에 기초한 우리 민중의 저항권을 중심으로-

Thoughts of Natural Law of and Resistances by Korean Peoples against Japanese Colonial Occupational Controls by Positivistic Bad Acts during Colonial Period

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Acts, which had been legislated and implemented by Japanese Occupational Authorities in Korea during colonial period from 1910 to 1945, had been very bad and brutal, because they had been on the basis of legal positivism. Colonial controls by imperialistic Japan may be evaluated as illegal torts by statutes to Korea and Korean peoples. The Japanese Occupational Authority had carried out unlawful and brutal controls to Korea and Korean peoples on the basis of statutes, which had been decreed by Japanese King or Governor of the Japanese Occupational Authority, who had transplanted Japanese acts in Korea through his decrees. All Governors of the Japanese Occupational Authority had been military generals, not civilians. The Governors had powers to legislate acts in Korea. But they had not sufficient knowledges of law enough to legislate acts. Therefore, they had mainly transplanted Japanese acts, which had been legislated by Japanese Imperial Diet, into Korea through their decrees. If necessary, Japanese King had directly issued his decrees, which had been effective in Korea. The Japanese Monarchy of those days was very imperialistic and persued colonial occupations over neighboring countries. Namely, ultimate goal of the then Japanese Imperilialsitic Monarchy was to be become a nation for wealth and military power. As a result of such political policies, the Japanese Imperialistic Monarchy expanded its colonies by conquering its neighboring countries and provoked the Second World War in Asia and the Pacific. By the decrees by Japanese King or the Governors of the Japanese Occupational Authority during colonial period in Korea, the Japanese Occupational Authority had coerced Korean peoples to change their original names into those of Japan, not to speak Korean language, confiscated agricultural products, mobilized Korean peoples for war coercively and recruited Korean young women for sexual comfort of Japanese soldiers etc.. These unhuman torts of Japan had been carried out through legislated bad statutes, which was effective by the legal thought of positivism, not by the thought of natural law. The then Japanese Imperialistic Monarchy had followed and kept the legal positivism. Korean peoples had resisted against bad and brutal controls and coercions with belief of thoughts of natural law, which admits only justifiable acts as effective law. Korean peoples had carried out independent movement only with belief of natural law. Leaders of independent movements had established Provisonal Korean Government and legislated modern Provisonal Korean Constitution, which had guaranteed basic human rights of Korean. Such independent movements had continued for duration of colonial period continously at great sacrifices of Korean underprivileged peoples. Such Korean sacrificial independent movements could be carried out on the basis of belief of unwritten natural law, which justifies resitances against bad colonial policies and brutal controls by Japanese unhuman acts on the philosophical basis of legal positivism. Finally, Korea has been emancipated from the colonial york of Imperialistic Japan due to the continous resistances of Korean peoples with the firm belief of natural law. Therefore, the thoughts of natural law has been able to be the fundermental legal thoughts of Korea even after establishment of Korean Government. It would be able to be evaluated that the unwritten natural law in the minds of Korean peoples has won over the written legislated imperialistic bad acts of Japan on the legal positivism. Even though Korean peoples had experienced harsh hardnesses during the colonial period, we had kept the thoughts of natural law and developed natural law, which could make peoples live dignitary and resist against unlawful measures of states. Even though the acts would be legislated by competent authorities, they are not able to be acknowledged and effective as acts, if their contents would not be conr connt with the universial common values of mankinds. Therefore, the natural law shall be the legal policy in Korea. If we would develop natural law continously in the future, the state status of Korea would be highly graded up and Koreans would become highly cultivated and civilized peoples in the world.

Abstract

Acts, which had been legislated and implemented by Japanese Occupational Authorities in Korea during colonial period from 1910 to 1945, had been very bad and brutal, because they had been on the basis of legal positivism. Colonial controls by imperialistic Japan may be evaluated as illegal torts by statutes to Korea and Korean peoples. The Japanese Occupational Authority had carried out unlawful and brutal controls to Korea and Korean peoples on the basis of statutes, which had been decreed by Japanese King or Governor of the Japanese Occupational Authority, who had transplanted Japanese acts in Korea through his decrees. All Governors of the Japanese Occupational Authority had been military generals, not civilians. The Governors had powers to legislate acts in Korea. But they had not sufficient knowledges of law enough to legislate acts. Therefore, they had mainly transplanted Japanese acts, which had been legislated by Japanese Imperial Diet, into Korea through their decrees. If necessary, Japanese King had directly issued his decrees, which had been effective in Korea. The Japanese Monarchy of those days was very imperialistic and persued colonial occupations over neighboring countries. Namely, ultimate goal of the then Japanese Imperilialsitic Monarchy was to be become a nation for wealth and military power. As a result of such political policies, the Japanese Imperialistic Monarchy expanded its colonies by conquering its neighboring countries and provoked the Second World War in Asia and the Pacific. By the decrees by Japanese King or the Governors of the Japanese Occupational Authority during colonial period in Korea, the Japanese Occupational Authority had coerced Korean peoples to change their original names into those of Japan, not to speak Korean language, confiscated agricultural products, mobilized Korean peoples for war coercively and recruited Korean young women for sexual comfort of Japanese soldiers etc.. These unhuman torts of Japan had been carried out through legislated bad statutes, which was effective by the legal thought of positivism, not by the thought of natural law. The then Japanese Imperialistic Monarchy had followed and kept the legal positivism. Korean peoples had resisted against bad and brutal controls and coercions with belief of thoughts of natural law, which admits only justifiable acts as effective law. Korean peoples had carried out independent movement only with belief of natural law. Leaders of independent movements had established Provisonal Korean Government and legislated modern Provisonal Korean Constitution, which had guaranteed basic human rights of Korean. Such independent movements had continued for duration of colonial period continously at great sacrifices of Korean underprivileged peoples. Such Korean sacrificial independent movements could be carried out on the basis of belief of unwritten natural law, which justifies resitances against bad colonial policies and brutal controls by Japanese unhuman acts on the philosophical basis of legal positivism. Finally, Korea has been emancipated from the colonial york of Imperialistic Japan due to the continous resistances of Korean peoples with the firm belief of natural law. Therefore, the thoughts of natural law has been able to be the fundermental legal thoughts of Korea even after establishment of Korean Government. It would be able to be evaluated that the unwritten natural law in the minds of Korean peoples has won over the written legislated imperialistic bad acts of Japan on the legal positivism. Even though Korean peoples had experienced harsh hardnesses during the colonial period, we had kept the thoughts of natural law and developed natural law, which could make peoples live dignitary and resist against unlawful measures of states. Even though the acts would be legislated by competent authorities, they are not able to be acknowledged and effective as acts, if their contents would not be conr connt with the universial common values of mankinds. Therefore, the natural law shall be the legal policy in Korea. If we would develop natural law continously in the future, the state status of Korea would be highly graded up and Koreans would become highly cultivated and civilized peoples in the world.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. 김병화, "한국사법사(중세편)" (1980), 일조각
  2. 김병화, "한국사법사(근세편)" (1980), 일조각
  3. 法史와 法政策: 韓國法史 중심, "김상용", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2006)
  4. 한국독립선언서연구, "김소진", 국학자료원, ~ (1999)
  5. 김영수, "대한민국임시정부헌법론" (1980), 삼영사
  6. 김진봉, "3·1운동: 교양국사총서 31" (1989), 세종대왕기념사업회
  7. 안상교, "대한독립선언서총람" (1996), 복지문화사
  8. 박은정, "자연법의 문제들" (2007), 세창출판사
  9. 서희석, "한국민법에 대한 일본민법의 영향과 향후의 과제: 비교법의 연구대상으로서의 일본민법을 위하여. in: 민법시행 50주년 기념: 민법의 자화상과 미래상", 2010년 추계 대법원·한국민사법학회 공동학술대회 자료집 (2010), 한국민사법학회
  10. 동아일보사, "세계의 인권선언", 신동아, (1월) (1975)
  11. 심재우, "저항권" (2000), 고려대학교 출판부
  12. Stephanie Schwartz Driver, "세계를 뒤흔든 독립선언서" (2005), 그린비
  13. 法을 통한 朝鮮植民地 支配에 관한 硏究, "鈴木敬夫", 고려대학교 민족문화연구소, ~ (1989)
  14. 오호택, "인권선언의 역사적 전개", 석사, pp.1988
  15. 윤대성, "한국민법이전의 민법학(II): 초기 민법교과서에 의한 민법학. in: 현대법의 과제와 전망", 觀淡김윤구박사화갑기념 (1999)
  16. 윤대성, "미군정기(1945-1948)의 민법학: 한국민법전 이전의 민법학(III). in: 민사법의 실천적 과제", 閑道정환담교수화갑기념 (2000)
  17. 윤철홍, "사법상의 일제잔재청산", 법사학연구, (16) (1995), 한국법사학회
  18. 이상욱, "우리나라 법제의 근대화와 민법전 편찬. in: 사법학의 재조명", 松村박영우교수화갑기념 (1994)
  19. 이태재, "자연법개론" (1973), 법문사
  20. 이태재, "법철학사와 자연법론" (1984), 법문사
  21. 조규창, "구한말 서구법계수의 역사적 의의. in: 논리와 직관: 조규창교수논문집" (1998), 법문사
  22. 조규창, "서구법 수용에 있어서 법학교육의 역사적 의의. in: 논리와 직관: 조규창교수논문집" (1998), 법문사
  23. 최종고, "일제시대의 한국법학. in: 민사법과 환경법의 제문제", 松軒안이준박사화갑기념 (1986)
  24. 최종고, "한국법학사" (1990), 박영사
  25. 최종고, "한국법사상사" (1999), 서울대학교출판부
  26. Collingwood Robin G., "Die Idee der Natur" (2006), Suhrkamp
  27. Eisenhardt Ulrich, "Deutsche Rechtsgeschichte, 2. Aufl." (1995), Beck
  28. Euchner Walter, "Naturrecht und Politik bei John Locke" (1969), Europäische Verlaganstalt
  29. Euchner Walter, "Naturrecht und Politik bei John Locke" (1979), Suhrkamp Verlag
  30. Grimm Dieter, "Europäisches Naturrecht und Amerikanische Revolution. in: Ius Commune Band 3: Veröffentlichungen des Max-Planck-Instituts für Europäische Rechtsgeschichte" (1970), Vittorio Klostermann
  31. Hattenhauer Hans, "Textbuch zur Privatrechtsgeschichte der Neuzeit" (1967), Beck
  32. Homes Hendrik, "Major Trends in the History of Legal Philosophy" (1979), North-Holland Publishing Company
  33. Keel Hee-Sung, "Naturalism: An Old Vision for a New World", 학술원논문집: 인문·사회과학편, 49(1) (2010), 대한민국 학술원
  34. Kelly J.M., "A Short History of Western Legal Theory" (2003), Clarendon Press
  35. Kiesow Rainer Maria, "Das Naturgesetz des Rechts" (1997), Suhrkamp
  36. Luig Klaus, "Naturrecht, Nationales Recht, Goldbach" (1998), Keip Verlag
  37. von Wolfgang Heidelmeyer, "Die Menschenrechte, 4. Aufl." (1997), Ferdinad Schöningh
  38. Rüthers Bernd, "Rechtstheorie" (1999), Beck
  39. Schloss Hans, "Grundzüge der Neueren Privatrechtsgeschichte, 4. Aufl." (1982), C.F.Müller
  40. Sprenger Gerhard, "Naturrecht und Natur der Sache" (1976), Duncker & Humblot
  41. Strauss Leo, "Natural Right and History" (1971), The University of Chicago Press
  42. Thieme Hans, "Das Naturrecht und die europäische Privatrechtsgeschichte, 2. Aufl." (1954), Verlag von Helbing & Lichtenbahn
  43. Wesener Gunter, "Römisches Recht und Naturrecht, Austria, Graz, Akademische Druck- u" (1978), Verlagsanstalt

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)