본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

官治, 식민지에서 ‘법의 지배’: 한말ㆍ일제강점기 ‘법’과 ‘법치’에 대한 한국인의 경험을 중심으로

Government Control, “Rule of Law” in a Colony - With a focus on Korean experiences of “law” and “governance by law” during the end of Joseon and Japanese rule -

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

“Governance by law” is one of the indicators to assess the formal completion of a modern state. In the forms of “governance by law,” the colonial rule of Japanese imperialism had clear differences from the Joseon Dynasty. In addition, it was abnormal even compared with Japanese imperialism on the mainland, let alone modern Western nations. Modernization or civilization showed a tendency of arguing for the exclusion of violence and yet finding an exception in the violence inherent in the modern laws. Modern institutions control and monopolize violence at the same time. Setting aside the violence of modern laws as universal rules, this study set out to examine the transplantation of legal systems after Korea opened its ports to foreign trade and the experiences and perceptions of “governance by law” among the Korean people during Japanese rule. After Korea opened its ports to foreign trade, the reform of the judicial system was inevitably subjected to time differences and distortions until its actualization beyond the systematic dimension. The investigator examined the process with a focus on the records written by foreign visitors to the nation since it was unlikely that the common people were exposed to or had experiences with the modern judicial system during the period. The full-blown modernization of the judicial system was pushed ahead after colonization. The concept of “rule of law” made people imagine the formal rationality of modern times. It was, however, a “forced ruling” that comprehensively expressed the 1910s when the reorganization of the judicial system was concentrated on. Those days, the Korean people faced the Japanese Empire in the forms of military police, their assistants, and police all over the place. For the people of Joseon, law was the fearful power of colony, and governance by law was the politics of the Governor-General with absolute power. In a situation where the Governor-General had the authority to proclaim even regulations in addition to the administrative and judicial power, law was nothing but a means of colonial rule. Colonial Joseon was a police state with the mighty administrative and judicial right to disposal granted to the police. The subjects of law enforcement including the policemen and judicial officials did not hesitate to have their own colonial ways in the name of the law, which led to distrust in and negative perception of the law. The laws of the Japanese Government-General of Korea were decorated with modern legislation even though they had fundamental limitations as commissioned laws. The colonial legislation had its own essential defects including many exemption laws on the excuse of Joseon's unique circumstances and also followed the mechanism of universal modern legislation that allowed for nothing from the outside. “Law abidance” was forced on the people as an unconditional duty even in the colony regardless of the content and nature of legislation, and that legal discourse has influences on the perceptions of Korean people even today.

Abstract

“Governance by law” is one of the indicators to assess the formal completion of a modern state. In the forms of “governance by law,” the colonial rule of Japanese imperialism had clear differences from the Joseon Dynasty. In addition, it was abnormal even compared with Japanese imperialism on the mainland, let alone modern Western nations. Modernization or civilization showed a tendency of arguing for the exclusion of violence and yet finding an exception in the violence inherent in the modern laws. Modern institutions control and monopolize violence at the same time. Setting aside the violence of modern laws as universal rules, this study set out to examine the transplantation of legal systems after Korea opened its ports to foreign trade and the experiences and perceptions of “governance by law” among the Korean people during Japanese rule. After Korea opened its ports to foreign trade, the reform of the judicial system was inevitably subjected to time differences and distortions until its actualization beyond the systematic dimension. The investigator examined the process with a focus on the records written by foreign visitors to the nation since it was unlikely that the common people were exposed to or had experiences with the modern judicial system during the period. The full-blown modernization of the judicial system was pushed ahead after colonization. The concept of “rule of law” made people imagine the formal rationality of modern times. It was, however, a “forced ruling” that comprehensively expressed the 1910s when the reorganization of the judicial system was concentrated on. Those days, the Korean people faced the Japanese Empire in the forms of military police, their assistants, and police all over the place. For the people of Joseon, law was the fearful power of colony, and governance by law was the politics of the Governor-General with absolute power. In a situation where the Governor-General had the authority to proclaim even regulations in addition to the administrative and judicial power, law was nothing but a means of colonial rule. Colonial Joseon was a police state with the mighty administrative and judicial right to disposal granted to the police. The subjects of law enforcement including the policemen and judicial officials did not hesitate to have their own colonial ways in the name of the law, which led to distrust in and negative perception of the law. The laws of the Japanese Government-General of Korea were decorated with modern legislation even though they had fundamental limitations as commissioned laws. The colonial legislation had its own essential defects including many exemption laws on the excuse of Joseon's unique circumstances and also followed the mechanism of universal modern legislation that allowed for nothing from the outside. “Law abidance” was forced on the people as an unconditional duty even in the colony regardless of the content and nature of legislation, and that legal discourse has influences on the perceptions of Korean people even today.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. 韓國內部警察局, "韓國警察一斑" (1910)
  2. "한국근대사기초자료집5 일제강점기의 사법", 국사편찬위원회, ~ (2012)
  3. 까를로 로제티, "코레아 코레아니" (1995), 서울학연구소
  4. 리하르트 분쉬, "고종의 독일인 의사 분쉬" (1999), 학고재
  5. 아손 그렙스트, "스웨덴기자 아손, 100년전 한국을 걷다" (2005), 책과함께
  6. 제이콥 로버트 무스, "1900, 조선에 살다" (2008), 푸른역사
  7. 카르네프, "내가 본 조선, 조선인" (2003), 가야넷
  8. 펠릭스 클레르 리델, "나의 서울 감옥 생활 1878" (2009), 살림
  9. 江見水蔭, "捕鯨船" (1907), 博文館
  10. "개벽", ~
  11. "동광", ~
  12. "별건곤", ~
  13. "삼천리", ~
  14. 박동성, "식민지 조선의 농촌사회와 농업경제" (2008), YBM Si-sa
  15. 도면회, "한국 근대 형사재판 제도사" (2014), 푸른역사
  16. 문준영, "법원과 검찰의 탄생: 사법의 역사로 읽는 대한민국" (2010), 역사비평사
  17. 문인구, "한국법의 실상과 허상" (1985), 삼지원
  18. 신우철, "비교헌법사:대한민죽 입헌주의의 연원" (2008), 법문사
  19. 심재우, "조선후기 국가권력과 범죄통계-「심리록」연구" (2009), 태학사
  20. 이 인, "반세기의 증언" (1974), 명지대학출판부
  21. 이정훈, "조선시대 법과 법 사상" (2011), 선인
  22. 정긍식, "한국근대법사고" (2002), 박영사
  23. 김경옥, "조선의 일상, 법정에 서다" (2013), 역사비평사
  24. 한인섭, "식민지 법정에서 독립을 변론하다-허헌 김병로 이인과 항일 재판투쟁" (2012), 경인문화사
  25. 한인섭, "한국형사법과 법의 지배" (1998), 한울
  26. 김창록, "制令에 관한 연구", 법사학연구, (26), pp.109~171 (2002), 한국법사학회
  27. 김창록, "‘法’, 그 속에 잔존하는 일제유산의 극복", 법사학연구, 16 (1995)
  28. 김철수, "일제 식민지 시대 치안관계 법규의 형성과 적용에 관한 연구", 한국사회학, 29 (1995)
  29. 명순구, "아직도 살아있는 법, ‘朝鮮民事令’ -'조선민사령'의 소급적 폐지를 제안한다 -", 저스티스, (103), pp.220~236 (2008), 한국법학원
  30. 문준영, "1895년 裁判所構成法의 ‘出現’과 日本의 役割", 법사학연구, (39), pp.35~81 (2009), 한국법사학회
  31. 문준영, "한국의 형사사법과 민사분쟁형 고소사건 -구한말과 일제시대의 경험-", 법학연구, 48(1), pp.1401~1438 (2007), 법학연구소
  32. 문준영, "한말과 식민지시기 재판제도의 변화와 민사분쟁", 법사학연구, (46), pp.247~304 (2012), 한국법사학회
  33. 박병호, "현대법제의 형성과 법제의 발전방향", 법제연구, 8 (1995)
  34. 신동운, "일제하의 예심제도에 관하여", 서울대학교법학, 27(1) (1986)
  35. 신동운, "한국법사학논총" (1991), 박병호교수회갑기념논총발간위원회
  36. 양홍준, "통감부시기 형사경찰제도와 범죄 수사", 韓國史學報, (22), pp.165~199 (2006), 고려사학회
  37. 염복규, "1910년대 일제의 태형제도 시행과 운용", 역사와 현실, (53), pp.187~219 (2004), 한국역사연구회
  38. 유진식, "한국의 근대법(=가상현실) 수용의 단면(斷面): 근대법의 수용과 식민지시대의 법", 법사학연구, (32), pp.69~94 (2005), 한국법사학회
  39. 이종민, "가벼운 범죄·무거운 처벌 - 1910년대의 즉결처분 대상을 중심으로", 사회와역사(구 한국사회사학회논문집), (107), pp.7~40 (2015), 한국사회사학회
  40. 이지훈, "김동인 소설에 나타난 식민지 법의 의미 연구", 한국현대문학연구, (42), pp.353~382 (2014), 한국현대문학회
  41. 이철우, "일제시대 법제의 구조와 성격", 한국정치외교사논총, 22(1) (2000)
  42. 허영란, "한국근현대 정치와 일본 1" (2010), 선인
  43. 허영란, "일제시기 지역주민운동의 전개과정 분석 ―장시를 둘러싼 갈등을 중심으로―", 역사문제연구, 13(1), pp.213~249 (2009), 역사문제연구소

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)