나노物質의 環境侵害責任에 關한 小考
The Liability for Environmental Pollution Damages to Nanomaterials
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Nanotechnology is the study of manipulating matter on an atomic and molecular scale. Generally, nanotechnology deals with developing materials, devices, or other structures possessing at least one dimension sized from 1 to 100 nanometres. Nanotechnology is very diverse, ranging from extensions of conventional device physics to completely new approaches based upon molecular self-assembly, from developing new materials with dimensions on the nanoscale to investigating whether we can directly control matter on the atomic scale. Nanotechnology entails the application of fields of science as diverse as surface science, organic chemistry, molecular biology, semiconductor physics, microfabrication, etc. There is much debate on the future implications of nanotechnology. Nanotechnology may be able to create many new materials and devices with a vast range of applications, such as in medicine,electronics, biomaterials and energy production. On the other hand, nanotechnology raises many of the same issues as any new technology, including concerns about the toxicity and environmental impact of nanomaterials, and their potential effects on global economics, as well as speculation about various doomsday scenarios. These concerns have led to a debate among advocacy groups and governments on whether special regulation of nanotechnology is warranted. Calls for tighter regulation of nanotechnology have occurred alongside a growing debate related to the human health and safety risks of nanotechnology. A nanomaterials have a potential risk, the proposed regulation must be prepared for it. Proposed regulation of translation in risk of nanomaterials. Nanomaterials are very small, if the person enters the body, can be applied to environmental liability law. Up to now, for damage due to the risk of nanomaterials has not occurred, a discussion of the proposed discipline is the actual situation is not enough this. Remedy is necessary due to limitations of the application of liability law, with the damage of nanomaterials, especially as ex-post remedy. Bailout of nanomaterials damage, must be carefully explored to the extent that it does not inhibit the development of nanotechnology. This is the sense of being able to recognize the economic value added with nanotechnology, to harmonize and Regulations. Thus, the enactment of the doctrine of discipline about the dangers of nanomaterials, it is necessary to the accumulation of information through a number of studies. Reason that the risk of nanomaterials revealed to date, which is to prevent all aspects of research or development of nanotechnology, there is no effectiveness. Therefore, upon to provide a remedy to prepare for the damage of nanomaterials, without interfering with the promotion of the development of nanotechnology, must be able to regulate risk. For this reason, the presentation of the proposed remedy, shall be fully reflects the professional opinions of scientists related to nanotechnology
Abstract
Nanotechnology is the study of manipulating matter on an atomic and molecular scale. Generally, nanotechnology deals with developing materials, devices, or other structures possessing at least one dimension sized from 1 to 100 nanometres. Nanotechnology is very diverse, ranging from extensions of conventional device physics to completely new approaches based upon molecular self-assembly, from developing new materials with dimensions on the nanoscale to investigating whether we can directly control matter on the atomic scale. Nanotechnology entails the application of fields of science as diverse as surface science, organic chemistry, molecular biology, semiconductor physics, microfabrication, etc. There is much debate on the future implications of nanotechnology. Nanotechnology may be able to create many new materials and devices with a vast range of applications, such as in medicine,electronics, biomaterials and energy production. On the other hand, nanotechnology raises many of the same issues as any new technology, including concerns about the toxicity and environmental impact of nanomaterials, and their potential effects on global economics, as well as speculation about various doomsday scenarios. These concerns have led to a debate among advocacy groups and governments on whether special regulation of nanotechnology is warranted. Calls for tighter regulation of nanotechnology have occurred alongside a growing debate related to the human health and safety risks of nanotechnology. A nanomaterials have a potential risk, the proposed regulation must be prepared for it. Proposed regulation of translation in risk of nanomaterials. Nanomaterials are very small, if the person enters the body, can be applied to environmental liability law. Up to now, for damage due to the risk of nanomaterials has not occurred, a discussion of the proposed discipline is the actual situation is not enough this. Remedy is necessary due to limitations of the application of liability law, with the damage of nanomaterials, especially as ex-post remedy. Bailout of nanomaterials damage, must be carefully explored to the extent that it does not inhibit the development of nanotechnology. This is the sense of being able to recognize the economic value added with nanotechnology, to harmonize and Regulations. Thus, the enactment of the doctrine of discipline about the dangers of nanomaterials, it is necessary to the accumulation of information through a number of studies. Reason that the risk of nanomaterials revealed to date, which is to prevent all aspects of research or development of nanotechnology, there is no effectiveness. Therefore, upon to provide a remedy to prepare for the damage of nanomaterials, without interfering with the promotion of the development of nanotechnology, must be able to regulate risk. For this reason, the presentation of the proposed remedy, shall be fully reflects the professional opinions of scientists related to nanotechnology
참고문헌 (53)
- 곽윤직, "채권각론" (2003), 박영사
- 구연창, "환경보전법" (1981), 삼영사
- 김상용, "채권각론" (2009), 화산미디어
- 김규완, "민법학강의(제10판)" (2011), 신조사(서울)
- 김홍균, "환경법" (2007), 홍문사
- 오석락, "입증책임론" (1989), 일신사
- 이상목, "환경정책기본법과 환경정책개별법" (1992), 사법행정
- 이시윤, "신민사소송법" (2011), 박영사
- 이은영, "채권각론, 제5판" (2007), 박영사
- 전경운, "환경사법론" (2009), 집문당
- 지원림, "민법강의" (2011), 홍문사
- 나노융합2020사업, "한국과학기술기획평가원", 한국과학기술기획평가원, ~ (2011)
- 나노-바이오 기술, "한국과학기술정보연구원", 한국과학기술정보연구원, ~ (2002)
- 신기술(6T)분야 과학기술인력의 공급 실태 분석, "한유경", 한국교육개발원, ~ (2004)
- 강봉석, "유전공학에서의 손해배상책임", 환경법연구, 24(1) (2002), 환경법학회
- 강상규, "나노기술 연구개발 성과의 상업화 현황분석", 한국기술혁신학회 학술대회 발표논문집, (10) (2005)
- 김대경, "現行 獨逸法上 나노技術과 責任法에 관한 小考", 경희법학, 47(1), pp.185~220 (2012), 법학연구소
- 김대석, "The Breakthrough of Micro", Nano Fundamental Technology, 2007, ~[DOI]
- 김연태, "환경법에 있어서 사전배려원칙의 실현", 법학논집, 34 (1998)
- 김종천, "과학기술발전에 따른 리스크·위험방지를 위한 국가의 안전보호의무", 외법논집, 33(1), pp.339~389 (2009), 법학연구소
- 김형배, "위험책임체계와 특별법의 해석", 법학논집, 34 (1998)
- 김홍균, "토양환경보전법 책임체계의 새로운 방향: 브라운필드(Brownfields) 문제", 저스티스, (110), pp.254~279 (2009), 한국법학원
- 김환석, "과학기술 시대의 연구윤리", 생명윤리, 2(2) (2001)
- 맹승희, "나노 독성의 개념 및 나노입자에 대한 위해성 평가의 필요성", 한국독성학회지, 21(2), pp.87~98 (2005), 한국독성학회
- 박광식, "나노물질의 독성과 위해성평가 전략", 환경독성보건학회지, 20(4), pp.259~271 (2005), 환경독성보건학회
- 박세화, "미국 환경법상의 회사와 주주의 정화책임－CERCLA를 중심으로", 비교사법, 7(1) (2000)
- 박종원, "토양환경법제의 최근 동향과 쟁점", 환경법과 정책, 4, pp.149~198 (2010), 비교법학연구소
- 박준원, "나노바이오기술 동향", 전자공학회지, 32(8) (2005)
- 박희호, "책임의 성립과 배상범위의 확정을 위한 인과관계의 구별에 관한 재론", 법학연구, 18(1), pp.307~327 (2010), 법학연구소
- 서광민, "과학기술의 발달과 불법행위법의 대응", 민사법학, (21) (2002), 한국민사법학회
- 소재선, "나노物質危險에 따른 事前配慮原則의 適用에 관한 小考", 토지공법연구, 56, pp.443~476 (2012), 한국토지공법학회
- 안법영, "환경오염사고와 위험책임", 환경오염의 법적 구제와 개선책, 47 (1996)
- 오현규, "위법성의 판단기준으로써의 수인한도, In 민사판례연구 XXV" (2003), 박영사
- 우기도, "미국의 나노기술의 연구 투자 현황", 재료마당, 14(15) (2001)
- 윤완수, "나노소자 기술과 바이오 측정", 기계저널, 44(10) (2004)
- 이영희, "나노기술을 둘러싼 사회적 쟁점 연구", 과학기술학연구, 4(1) (2004)
- 이정일, "나노재료기술의 윤리적 고찰과 관련 정책제안", 한국진공학회지, 19(6), pp.397~407 (2010), 한국진공학회
- 임건면, "민법상의 손해의 개념", 비교사법, 8(2) (2001)
- 임석원, "법익의 보호범위의 확대와 해석의 한계 -형사법익과 민사법익의 비교를 중심으로-", 법학연구, (41), pp.291~315 (2011), 한국법학회
- 정은미, "나노기술의 현황과 산업화 전망", KIET 산업경제 (2006), 산업연구원
- 정진명, "환경오염의 피해에 대한 사법적 구제", 환경법연구, 21 (1999)
- 조홍식, "土壤環境侵害에 關한 法的 責任", 환경법 연구, 20 (1998)
- 최붕기, "나노기술의 환경, 보건, 안전성 영향에관한 연구동향", 공업화학전망, 10(1) (2007)
- 최상호, "불법행위법에 있어서의 위법성과 과실", 안암법학, (1) (1993)
- 홍기문, "불법행위로 인한 손해배상소송에 있어서 손해액에 관한 입증책임", 법학논총, 24 (2004)
- Alexander Reuter, "Das neue Gesetz über die Umweltthaftung" (1991), BB
- Bhabra, G., "Nanoparticles can cause DNA damage across a cellular barrier", Nature Nanotechnology, 5 (2009)
- J. Norbert, "Ethical Implications of Nanotechnology- State-of-the-art Survey of Ethical Issues related to Nanobiotechnology" (2006), LIT Verlag
- Levere, Trevor Harvey, "Transforming Matter: A History of Chemistry from Alchemy to the Buckyball" (2003), Johns Hopkins University Press
- M. Brenner, "Das Risiko im öffentlichen Recht" (2003), DÖV
- Oberdrster, G., "Correlation Between Particle Size, In Vivo Particle Persistence, and Lung Injury", Environ. Health Perspect, 1002 (1994)
- Oberdrster, G., "Correlation Between Particle Size, In Vivo Particle Persistence, and Lung Injury", Environ. Health Perspect, 1002 (2004)
- Othmar Jauernig, "Zivilprozessrecht, 24., Aufl." (1993)