본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Differences in microbiome and virome between cattle and horses in the same farm

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objective: The ecosystem of an animal farm is composed of various elements, such as animals, farmers, plants, feed, soil, and microorganisms. A domesticated animal’s health is largely connected with the reservoir of bacteria and viruses in animal farms. Although a few studies have focused on exploring the gut microbiome of animals, communities of microbiota and viruses in feedlots have not been thoroughly investigated. Methods: Here, we collected feces and dust samples (4 groups: cattle feces, C_F; horse feces, H_F; cattle dust, C_D; and horse dust, H_D) from cattle and horse farms sharing the same housing and investigated their microbiome/virome communities by Illumina sequencing. Results: Dust groups (C_D and H_D) showed higher microbial diversity than feces groups (C_F and H_F) regardless of animal species. From the microbial community analysis, all the samples from the four groups have major phyla such as Proteobacteria (min 37.1% to max 42.8%), Firmicutes (19.1% to 24.9%), Bacteroidetes (10.6% to 22.1%), and Actinobacteria (6.1% to 20.5%). The abundance of Streptococcus, which commonly recognized as equine pathogens, was significantly higher in the horse group (H_D and H_F). Over 99% among the classified virome reads were classified as Caudovirales, a group of tailed bacteriophages, in all four groups. Foot-and-mouth disease virus and equine adenovirus, which cause deadly diseases in cattle and horse, respectively, were not detected. Conclusion: Our results will provide baseline information to understand different gut and environmental microbial ecology between two livestock species.

Abstract

Objective: The ecosystem of an animal farm is composed of various elements, such as animals, farmers, plants, feed, soil, and microorganisms. A domesticated animal’s health is largely connected with the reservoir of bacteria and viruses in animal farms. Although a few studies have focused on exploring the gut microbiome of animals, communities of microbiota and viruses in feedlots have not been thoroughly investigated. Methods: Here, we collected feces and dust samples (4 groups: cattle feces, C_F; horse feces, H_F; cattle dust, C_D; and horse dust, H_D) from cattle and horse farms sharing the same housing and investigated their microbiome/virome communities by Illumina sequencing. Results: Dust groups (C_D and H_D) showed higher microbial diversity than feces groups (C_F and H_F) regardless of animal species. From the microbial community analysis, all the samples from the four groups have major phyla such as Proteobacteria (min 37.1% to max 42.8%), Firmicutes (19.1% to 24.9%), Bacteroidetes (10.6% to 22.1%), and Actinobacteria (6.1% to 20.5%). The abundance of Streptococcus, which commonly recognized as equine pathogens, was significantly higher in the horse group (H_D and H_F). Over 99% among the classified virome reads were classified as Caudovirales, a group of tailed bacteriophages, in all four groups. Foot-and-mouth disease virus and equine adenovirus, which cause deadly diseases in cattle and horse, respectively, were not detected. Conclusion: Our results will provide baseline information to understand different gut and environmental microbial ecology between two livestock species.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Tullo E, "Review : Environmental impact of livestock farming and precision livestock farming as a mitigation strategy", Sci Total Environ, 650, pp.2751~2760 (2019)[DOI]
  2. 강혁중, "Effects of ambient temperature and rumen–protected fat supplementation on growth performance, rumen fermentation and blood parameters during cold season in Korean cattle steers", Animal Bioscience, 32(5), pp.657~664 (2019), 아세아·태평양축산학회[DOI]
  3. 우제훈, "농후사료 급여 수준이 제주산마의 체중 변화, 장내 미생물과 혈액 성상에 미치는 영향", 동물자원연구, 28(1), pp.9~16 (2017), 동물생명과학연구소[DOI]
  4. Grubman MJ, "Foot-and-mouth disease", Clin Microbiol Rev, 17, pp.465~493 (2004)[DOI]
  5. Morrison PK, "The equine gastrointestinal microbiome : impacts of age and obesity", Front Microbiol, 9, pp.3017~ (2018)[DOI]
  6. Han GG, "Tracing of the fecal microbiota of commercial pigs at five growth stages from birth to shipment", Sci Rep, 8, pp.6012~ (2018)[DOI]
  7. 이민경, "Changes in the ruminal fermentation and bacterial community structure by a sudden change to a high-concentrate diet in Korean domestic ruminants", Animal Bioscience, 32(1), pp.92~102 (2019), 아세아·태평양축산학회[DOI]
  8. Kraemer JG, "Influence of pig farming on the human nasal microbiota : Key role of airborne microbial communities", Appl Environ Microbiol, 84, pp.e02470~17 (2018)[DOI]
  9. Timsit E, "Distinct bacterial metacommunities inhabit the upper and lower respiratory tracts of healthy feedlot cattle and those diagnosed with bronchopneumonia", Vet Microbiol, 221, pp.105~113 (2018)[DOI]
  10. Leclere M, "Heaves, an asthma‐like disease of horses", Respirology, 16, pp.1027~1046 (2011)[DOI]
  11. McKenzie VJ, "The effects of captivity on the mammalian gut microbiome", Integr Comp Biol, 57, pp.690~704 (2017)[DOI]
  12. Budiansky S, "The nature of horses" (1997), Simon and Schuster
  13. Hall JB, "Nutrition and feeding of the cow-calf herd: Digestive system of the cow" (2001), Virginia Cooperative Extension
  14. Apajalahti J, "Comparative gut microflora, metabolic challenges, and potential opportunities", J Appl Poult Res, 14, pp.444~453 (2005)[DOI]
  15. O’Donnell MM, "Core fecal microbiota of domesticated herbivorous ruminant, hindgut fermenters, and monogastric animals", Microbiologyopen, 6, pp.e00509~ (2017)[DOI]
  16. Henderson G, "Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range", Sci Rep, 5, pp.14567~ (2015)[DOI]
  17. He J, "Acquired tolerance to oxidative stress in Bifidobacterium longum 105-A via expression of a catalase gene", Appl Environ Microbiol, 78, pp.2988~2990 (2012)[DOI]
  18. Li J, "Clostridium perfringens sporulation and sporulation-associated toxin production", Microbiol Spectr, 4, pp.3~ (2016)[DOI]
  19. Ventura M, "Genomics of Actinobacteria : Tracing the evolutionary history of an ancient phylum", Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 71, pp.495~548 (2007)[DOI]
  20. Gomes KM, "Lantibiotics produced by Actinobacteria and their potential applications(a review)", Microbiology, 163, pp.109~121 (2017)[DOI]
  21. Myer PR, "Rumen microbiome from steers differing in feed efficiency", Plos One, 10, pp.e0129174~ (2015)[DOI]
  22. Liu C, "Role of age-related shifts in rumen bacteria and methanogens in methane production in cattle", Front Microbiol, 8, pp.1563~ (2017)[DOI]
  23. Wang X, "Luteimonas soli sp. nov., isolated from farmland soil", Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 65, pp.4809~4815 (2015)[DOI]
  24. Venable E, "Role of the gut microbiota in equine health and disease", Anim Front, 6, pp.43~49 (2016)[DOI]
  25. Hardie J, "The genus streptococcus, in the genera of lactic acid bacteria" (1995), Springer
  26. Boyle A, "Streptococcus equi infections in horses : Guidelines for treatment, control, and prevention of strangles—revised consensus statement", J Vet Intern Med, 32, pp.633~647 (2018)[DOI]
  27. Chen L, "Prediction and analysis of essential genes using the enrichments of gene ontology and KEGG pathways", Plos One, 12, pp.e0184129~ (2017)[DOI]
  28. Uhlik O, "Identification of bacteria utilizing biphenyl, benzoate, and naphthalene in long-term contaminated soil", Plos One, 7, pp.e40653~ (2012)[DOI]
  29. Ackermann HW, "Tailed bacteriophages : the order caudovirales", Adv Virus Res, 51, pp.135~201 (1998)[DOI]
  30. Park EJ, "Metagenomic analysis of the viral communities in fermented foods", Appl Environ Microbiol, 77, pp.1284~1291 (2011)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

Comparison of Fecal Microbiota of Mongolian and Thoroughbred Horses by High-throughput Sequencing of the V4 Region of the 16S rRNA GeneBei Li, Dongyi Bai, Jing Wu, Jinlong Huang, Lihua Yang, Manglai Dugarjaviin, Qinan Zhao, Wunierfu Shiraigo, Wuyundalai Bao, Xiujuan Ren, Yiping Zhao아세아·태평양축산학회 · Animal Bioscience2016 · 제29권 제9호Analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequencing data for the taxonomic characterization of the vaginal and the fecal microbial communities in HanwooCha Jihye, Choi Soyoung, Kim Tae-Hun, Lee Kyung-Tai, Lim Yeong-jo, Park Mi-Rim, Park Woncheoul, Song Minji, Son JuHwan아세아·태평양축산학회 · Animal Bioscience2022 · 제35권 제11호Evaluation of the microbiome composition in particulate matter inside and outside of pig houses박진선, Hanna Jeong, Min-Seok Kim, Se-Woon Hong한국축산학회 · 한국축산학회지2021 · 제63권 제3호Comparison of the fecal microbiota with high- and low performance race horses운노 타쯔야, Jungho Yoon, Taemook Park, Young-Min Yun한국축산학회 · 한국축산학회지2024 · 제66권 제2호Comparative analysis of the pig gut microbiome associated with the pig growth performance김산, 곽진옥, 김신아, 김현범, 두현옥, 류수민, 송민호, 조진호, Eun Sol Kim, Gi Beom Keum, Jae Hyoung Cho, Jun Hyung Lee, Sriniwas Pandey한국축산학회 · 한국축산학회지2023 · 제65권 제4호The impact of different diets and genders on fecal microbiota in Hanwoo cattle윤상, 박철주, 이후승, Hyeonsu Seon, Min-Seok Kim, Seunghyeun Sim한국축산학회 · 한국축산학회지2022 · 제64권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)