본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequencing data for the taxonomic characterization of the vaginal and the fecal microbial communities in Hanwoo

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objective: The study of Hanwoo (Korean native cattle) has mainly been focused on meat quality and productivity. Recently the field of microbiome research has increased dramatically. However, the information on the microbiome in Hanwoo is still insufficient, especially relationship between vagina and feces. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine the microbial community characteristics by analyzing the 16S rRNA sequencing data of Hanwoo vagina and feces, as well as to confirm the difference and correlation between vaginal and fecal microorganisms. As a result, the goal is to investigate if fecal microbiome can be used to predict vaginal microbiome. Methods: A total of 31 clinically healthy Hanwoo that delivered healthy calves more than once in Cheongju, South Korea were enrolled in this study. During the breeding season, we collected vaginal and fecal samples and sequenced the microbial 16S rRNA genes V3-V4 hypervariable regions from microbial DNA of samples. Results: The results revealed that the phylum-level microorganisms with the largest relative distribution were Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria in the vagina, and Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Spirochaetes in the feces, respectively. In the analysis of alpha, beta diversity, and effect size measurements (LefSe), the results showed significant differences between the vaginal and fecal samples. We also identified the function of these differentially abundant microorganisms by functional annotation analyses. But there is no significant correlation between vaginal and fecal microbiome. Conclusion: There is a significant difference between vaginal and fecal microbiome, but no significant correlation. Therefore, it is difficult to interrelate vaginal microbiome as fecal microbiome in Hanwoo. In a further study, it will be necessary to identify the genetic relationship of the entire microorganism between vagina and feces through the whole metagenome sequencing analysis and meta-transcriptome analysis to figure out their relationship.

Abstract

Objective: The study of Hanwoo (Korean native cattle) has mainly been focused on meat quality and productivity. Recently the field of microbiome research has increased dramatically. However, the information on the microbiome in Hanwoo is still insufficient, especially relationship between vagina and feces. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine the microbial community characteristics by analyzing the 16S rRNA sequencing data of Hanwoo vagina and feces, as well as to confirm the difference and correlation between vaginal and fecal microorganisms. As a result, the goal is to investigate if fecal microbiome can be used to predict vaginal microbiome. Methods: A total of 31 clinically healthy Hanwoo that delivered healthy calves more than once in Cheongju, South Korea were enrolled in this study. During the breeding season, we collected vaginal and fecal samples and sequenced the microbial 16S rRNA genes V3-V4 hypervariable regions from microbial DNA of samples. Results: The results revealed that the phylum-level microorganisms with the largest relative distribution were Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria in the vagina, and Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Spirochaetes in the feces, respectively. In the analysis of alpha, beta diversity, and effect size measurements (LefSe), the results showed significant differences between the vaginal and fecal samples. We also identified the function of these differentially abundant microorganisms by functional annotation analyses. But there is no significant correlation between vaginal and fecal microbiome. Conclusion: There is a significant difference between vaginal and fecal microbiome, but no significant correlation. Therefore, it is difficult to interrelate vaginal microbiome as fecal microbiome in Hanwoo. In a further study, it will be necessary to identify the genetic relationship of the entire microorganism between vagina and feces through the whole metagenome sequencing analysis and meta-transcriptome analysis to figure out their relationship.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. de Oliveira MNV, "Characterizing the microbiota across the gastrointestinal tract of a Brazilian Nelore steer", Vet Microbiol, 164, pp.307~314 (2013)[DOI]
  2. Gomez DE, "Characterization of the fecal bacterial microbiota of healthy and diarrheic dairy calves", J Vet Intern Med, 31, pp.928~939 (2017)[DOI]
  3. Fecteau ME, "Dysbiosis of the Fecal Microbiota in Cattle Infected with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis", PLoS One, 11, pp.e0160353~ (2016)[DOI]
  4. Sheldon IM, "Postpartum uterine health in cattle", Anim Reprod Sci, 82, pp.295~306 (2004)[DOI]
  5. Wang J, "Changes in the vaginal microbiota associated with primary ovarian failure", BMC Microbiol, 20, pp.230~ (2020)[DOI]
  6. Appiah MO, "Microflora in the reproductive tract of cattle : a review", Agriculture, 10, pp.232~ (2020)[DOI]
  7. Clemmons BA, "Vaginal and uterine bacterial communities in postpartum lactating cows", Front Microbiol, 8, pp.1047~ (2017)[DOI]
  8. Quereda JJ, "Vaginal microbiota changes during estrous cycle in dairy heifers", Front Vet Sci, 7, pp.371~ (2020)[DOI]
  9. Wang Y, "Characterisation of the bacterial microbiota of the vagina of dairy cows and isolation of pediocin-producing Pediococcus acidilactici", BMC Microbiol, 13, pp.19~ (2013)[DOI]
  10. Dobbler P, "The vaginal microbial communities of healthy expectant Brazilian mothers and its correlation with the newborn’s gut colonization", World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 35, pp.159~ (2019)[DOI]
  11. Amabebe E, "Female gut and genital tract microbiota-induced crosstalk and differential effects of shortchain fatty acids on immune sequelae", Front Immunol, 11, pp.2184~ (2020)[DOI]
  12. Klein-Jöbstl D, "Microbiota of newborn calves and their mothers reveals possible transfer routes for newborn calves’ gastrointestinal microbiota", PLoS One, 14, pp.e0220554~ (2019)[DOI]
  13. Laguardia-Nascimento M, "Vaginal microbiome characterization of Nellore cattle using metagenomic analysis", PLoS One, 10, pp.e0143294~ (2015)[DOI]
  14. 우제석, "저수태 한우 암소 자궁에서 회수된 미생물이 체외수정란 발달율에 미치는 영향", Korean Journal of Agricultural Science, 42(4), pp.355~359 (2015), 농업과학연구소[DOI]
  15. Devin B Holman, "A meta-analysis of the bovine gastrointestinal tract microbiota", FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 95(6), pp.fiz072~ (2019), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
  16. Kim ET, "Dynamic changes in fecal microbial communities of neonatal dairy calves by aging and diarrhea", Animals, 11, pp.1113~ (2021)[DOI]
  17. Bolyen E, "Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2", Nat Biotechnol, 37, pp.852~857 (2019)[DOI]
  18. Callahan BJ, "DADA2 : High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data", Nat Methods, 13, pp.581~583 (2016)[DOI]
  19. McDonald D, "An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea", ISME J, 6, pp.610~618 (2012)[DOI]
  20. Paulson JN, "Differential abundance analysis for microbial marker-gene surveys", Nat Methods, 10, pp.1200~1202 (2013)[DOI]
  21. Douglas GM, "PICRUSt2 : An improved and customizable approach for metagenome inference", bioRxiv, 672295~ (2020)
  22. Fernandes AD, "Unifying the analysis of high-throughput sequencing datasets : characterizing RNA-seq, 16S rRNA gene sequencing and selective growth experiments by compositional data analysis", Microbiome, 2, pp.15~ (2014)[DOI]
  23. Subramanian A, "Gene set enrichment analysis : a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles", Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 102, pp.15545~15550 (2005)[DOI]
  24. Wang J, "Translocation of vaginal microbiota is involved in impairment and protection of uterine health", Nat Commun, 12, pp.4191~ (2021)[DOI]
  25. Ling Z, "Molecular analysis of the diversity of vaginal microbiota associated with bacterial vaginosis", BMC Genomics, 11, pp.488~ (2010)[DOI]
  26. Freetly HC, "Digestive tract microbiota of beef cattle that differed in feed efficiency", Anim Sci J, 98, pp.skaa008~ (2020)[DOI]
  27. Ravel J, "Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women", Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 108, pp.4680~4687 (2011)[DOI]
  28. Miller EA, "Lactobacilli dominance and vaginal pH : why is the human vaginal microbiome unique?", Front Microbiol, 7, pp.1936~ (2016)[DOI]
  29. Ault TB, "Bacterial taxonomic composition of the postpartum cow uterus and vagina prior to artificial insemination", Anim Sci J, 97, pp.4305~4313 (2019)[DOI]
  30. Alipour MJ, "The composition of the perinatal intestinal microbiota in cattle", Sci Rep, 8, pp.10437~ (2018)[DOI]
  31. Mao S, "Characterising the bacterial microbiota across the gastrointestinal tracts of dairy cattle : membership and potential function", Sci Rep, 5, pp.16116~ (2015)[DOI]
  32. Alex J. La Reau, "The Ruminococci: key symbionts of the gut ecosystem", The Journal of Microbiology, 56(3), pp.199~208 (2018), 한국미생물학회[DOI]
  33. Papale M, "First insights into the microbiology of three Antarctic briny systems of the Northern Victoria Land", Diversity, 13, pp.323~ (2021)[DOI]
  34. Mattos-Graner RO, "Two-component signal transduction systems in oral bacteria", J Oral Microbiol, 9, pp.1400858~ (2017)[DOI]
  35. Thomas L, "Two-component signal transduction systems in the human pathogen Streptococcus agalactiae", Infect Immun, 88, pp.e00931-19~ (2020)[DOI]
  36. Seo JS, "Bacterial degradation of aromatic compounds", Int J Environ Res Public Health, 6, pp.278~309 (2009)[DOI]
  37. Kwon M, "Compositional and functional differences between microbiota and cervical carcinogenesis as identified by shotgun metagenomic sequencing", Cancers, 11, pp.309~ (2019)[DOI]
  38. Meale SJ, "Weaning age influences the severity of gastrointestinal microbiome shifts in dairy calves", Sci Rep, 7, pp.198~ (2017)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)