Fair Assessment Method Reflecting Individual Ability in Capstone Design Course
7
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Capstone design is a subject taught in a setting where students gather in a team, decide on their own selected topic, and collaboratewith one another to perform a project. A fair assessment is very important in a team project-based capstone design course for students. Many instructors agree that harmonizing creative evaluation and outcome assessment is hard in capstone design class. In also, it isnot easy to assess students’ individual efforts and achievements fairly in accordance with team-based assessment practices. To resolvethis issue in this paper, we have surveyed various engineering design education methodologies, and have modelled existing evaluatingelements into a modified creative process and outcome assessment framework for team project assessment. In particular, we focusedon a method of fairly assigning credits by combining team based and individual-level assessments. Analyzing students’ achievementand grade evaluation and verifying the validity of the proposed method was performed.
Abstract
Capstone design is a subject taught in a setting where students gather in a team, decide on their own selected topic, and collaboratewith one another to perform a project. A fair assessment is very important in a team project-based capstone design course for students. Many instructors agree that harmonizing creative evaluation and outcome assessment is hard in capstone design class. In also, it isnot easy to assess students’ individual efforts and achievements fairly in accordance with team-based assessment practices. To resolvethis issue in this paper, we have surveyed various engineering design education methodologies, and have modelled existing evaluatingelements into a modified creative process and outcome assessment framework for team project assessment. In particular, we focusedon a method of fairly assigning credits by combining team based and individual-level assessments. Analyzing students’ achievementand grade evaluation and verifying the validity of the proposed method was performed.
참고문헌 (15)
- "From TRIZ to ASIT in 4 steps" (2001)[URL]
- 황순희, "공과대학생의 팀 기반 수업에서 동료평가와 자기평가의 관계", 공학교육연구, 19(5), pp.3~12 (2016), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- Kilpatrick, D.J., "Procedural justice and the development and use of peer evaluations in business and accounting classes", Journal of Accounting Education, 19(3), pp.225~246 (2001)
- Kim, J., "An assessment method to evaluate team project based engineering design", Proc. of Int’l Conf. on Computer Science & Education, pp.257~260 (2014)
- Kim, J., "A Team Project Based Assessment Method for Engineering Design Course", International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 11(6), pp.159~170 (2016)[DOI]
- Kim, J., "Fair Assessment for Team Project Engineering Design Course", Convergence Research Letter, 4(4), pp.201~204 (2018)
- 김종환, "설계 수업에서 균형적인 팀 편성을 위한 수리적 모형", 공학교육연구, 21(4), pp.28~34 (2018), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- 이희원, "캡스톤디자인 교과목 기반의 프로그램 학습성과 평가 연구", 공학교육연구, 13(6), pp.143~151 (2010), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- Nikos J. Mourtos, "Defining, Teaching, and Assessing Engineering Design Skills", International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education, 2(1), pp.14~30 (2012), IGI Global[DOI]
- Ogot, M., "Integrating systematic creativity into first-year engineering design curriculum", International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(1), pp.109~115 (2006)
- Park, Y., "Creative Thinking Theory" (2016), Korea Standards Association Media
- Platanitis, G., "Establishing fair objectives and grading criteria for undergraduate design engineering project work: an ongoing experiment", International Journal of Research and Reviews in Applied Sciences, 5(3), pp.271~288 (2010)
- Schwab, K., "The Fourth Industrial Revolution" (2017), Penguin Books, Limited
- Walvoord, B. E., "Effective Grading: A Tool for Learning and Assessment" (1998), Jossey-Bass Inc
- Young, S. F., "Assessment and Learning: The ICE Approach" (2000), Portage & Main Press