본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

공과대학생의 일상적 창의성과 창의성 교육의 방향

Engineering Students' Everyday Creativity and Directions of Creativity Education

윤경미|황순희
한국공학교육학회 (Korean Society for Engineering Education)|2019.11|공학교육연구 (Journal of Engineering Education Research)|제22권 제6호|pp. 40-50|DOI 10.18108/jeer.2019.22.6.40

2

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

DirectionsCreativity educationEngineering studentsEveryday creativityDifferences of everyday creativity by majors
주제분류학제간연구

초록

The purpose of this study is to explore characteristics of engineering students' everyday creativity compared with those of undergraduatestudents. For this, we investigated whether there were differences in undergraduates’ everyday creativity according to majors, genderand grade. Everyday creativity can be defined as thinking and activities producing useful and suitable personal products, and to solveproblems in a new and unique ways. Thus everyday creativity is reported to be universal ability creative people can express in theireveryday life. Eight hundred and fifty seven students from three universities in three Korean regions responded to Everyday CreativityScale. Our findings show that firstly, there were significant differences in undergraduates' everyday creativity by majors and gender. Whereas there were no differences in the same survey by grade. Engineering students obtained significantly lower score of everydaycreativity as well as its sub-scales. Also, there were significant differences in everyday creativity's sub-factors by gender. Based onthese findings, practical implications for creativity education are discussed with particular attention to learner’s individual variables.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore characteristics of engineering students' everyday creativity compared with those of undergraduatestudents. For this, we investigated whether there were differences in undergraduates’ everyday creativity according to majors, genderand grade. Everyday creativity can be defined as thinking and activities producing useful and suitable personal products, and to solveproblems in a new and unique ways. Thus everyday creativity is reported to be universal ability creative people can express in theireveryday life. Eight hundred and fifty seven students from three universities in three Korean regions responded to Everyday CreativityScale. Our findings show that firstly, there were significant differences in undergraduates' everyday creativity by majors and gender. Whereas there were no differences in the same survey by grade. Engineering students obtained significantly lower score of everydaycreativity as well as its sub-scales. Also, there were significant differences in everyday creativity's sub-factors by gender. Based onthese findings, practical implications for creativity education are discussed with particular attention to learner’s individual variables.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. 강승희, "공학 전공 대학생의 창의성에 나타나는 성차", 한국기계가공학회지, 14(5), pp.50~59 (2015), 한국기계가공학회[DOI]
  2. 김명숙, "대학생의 학습참여가 지각된 창의성역량에 미치는 영향", 영재와 영재교육, 13(1), pp.83~106 (2014), 한국영재교육학회[DOI]
  3. 김정연, "창의융합 교과목 개발을 위한 대학생의 창의융합역량 차이 비교 및 분석", 통합교육과정연구, 11(4), pp.145~164 (2017), 한국통합교육과정학회
  4. 김형재, "대학생의 전공에 따른 창의성 비교 연구: 예비유아교사, 예비디자이너, 예비공학자를 중심으로", 디지털융복합연구, 15(6), pp.19~27 (2017), 한국디지털정책학회[DOI]
  5. 송윤숙, "창의성 수업이 대학생의 창의성과 인지적 학습역량에 미치는 영향", Global Creative Leader, 2(2), pp.73~88 (2012)
  6. 윤경미, "대학생의 일상적 창의성과 심리적 안녕감 간의 관계", 열린교육연구, 23(4), pp.105~127 (2015), 한국열린교육학회[DOI]
  7. 윤경미, "공과대학생의 사고양식 탐색", 공학교육연구, 20(5), pp.14~22 (2017), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
  8. 윤경미, "공과대학생의 일상적 창의성과 사고양식의 관계", 교양교육연구, 11(2), pp.413~448 (2017), 한국교양교육학회
  9. 이경화, "대학생의 제 변인에 따른 창의적 능력 비교", 창의력교육연구, 12(1), pp.29~47 (2012), 한국창의력교육학회[DOI]
  10. 이경화, "대학생의 창의성 및 창의적 리더십 비교를 통한 대학 창의성교육 강화 방안", 영재와 영재교육, 13(3), pp.59~83 (2014), 한국영재교육학회[DOI]
  11. 이경화, "핵심역량 기반 융합교육을 위한 대학생의 핵심역량 및 창의적 성향 비교", 교육종합연구, 13(2), pp.1~24 (2015), 교육종합연구원
  12. 이미나, "대학생의 창의성 교육에 대한 전공계열별 인식 비교", 교육과정연구, 30(3), pp.353~376 (2012), 한국교육과정학회[DOI]
  13. 정은이, "일상적 창의성과 개별성-관계성 및 심리·사회적 적응의 관계", 박사, 교육학, pp.2002
  14. 정은이, "일상적 창의성 척도의 개발 및 타당화", 교육문제연구, (17), pp.155~183 (2002), 교육문제연구소
  15. 황순희, "공과대학생의 ‘말하기 능력’에 대한 인식과 평가", 공학교육연구, 22(3), pp.18~31 (2019), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
  16. 황순희, "공과대학생의 일상적 창의성과 보편적 의사소통능력의 상관관계 탐색", 교양교육연구, 9(3), pp.399~434 (2015), 한국교양교육학회
  17. 황순희, "‘동아리’ 참가 대학생의 메타인지와 진로적응성 탐색", 교양교육연구, 13(1), pp.293~320 (2019), 한국교양교육학회
  18. Bartkus, K. R., "Clarifying the meaning of extracurricular activity : A literature review of definitions", American Journal of Business Education, 5(6), pp.693~704 (2012)
  19. Beghetto, R. A., "Creatively gifted students are not like other gifted students", pp.3~15 (2013), Brill Sense
  20. Binkely, M., "Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills", pp.17~66 (2012), Springer
  21. Bodran, I., "Enhancing creativity and innovation in engineering education", European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(5), pp.573~585 (2007)
  22. Charyton, C., "General, Artistic and Scientific Creativity Attributes of Engineering and Music Students", Creativity Research Journal, 19, pp.213~225 (2007)
  23. Cotter, K. N., "Applicant extracurricular involvement predicts creativity better than traditional admissions factors", Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(1), pp.2~13 (2016)
  24. Dalrymple, O., "The role of extracurricular activities in the education of engineers", International Conference on Engineering Education, pp.24~30 (2006)
  25. de Freitas, C. C. S., "Inclusion of extracurricular activities and student competitions in the curriculum structure for engineering education: Experience based on the Brazilian reality", 2013 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), pp.793~800 (2013)
  26. Elisondo, R. C., "The unexpected and education: curriculums for creativity", Creative Education, 4(12B), pp.11~15 (2013)
  27. Helson, R., "Arnheim Award address to division 10 of the American Psychological Association : In search of the creative personality", Creativity Research Journal, 9, pp.295~306 (1996)
  28. Kersting, K., "Considering creativity : What exactly is creativity?", American Psychological Association Monitor, 34, pp.40~ (2003)
  29. Kuhar, K., "The work and role of extracurricular clubs in fostering student creativity", Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(4), pp.93~104 (2016)
  30. Lunenburg, F. C., "Educational administration: Concepts and practices" (2011), Cengage Learning
  31. Montgomery, D., "College level creativity course content", Journal of Creative Behavior, 26(4), pp.228~234 (1992)
  32. National Academy of Engineering, U. S., "The engineer of 2020 : Visions of engineering in the new century" (2004), National Academies Press
  33. Nickerson, R. S., "Handbook of creativity", pp.392~430 (1999), Cambridge University
  34. "The definition and selection of key competencies (Executive summary)" (2005)[URL]
  35. Orhun, E., "Creativity and engineering education", Proceedings of 41st SEFI Conference, pp.16~20 (2013)
  36. Rugarcia, A., "The future of engineering education I. A vision for a new century", Chemical Engineering Education, 34(1), pp.16~25 (2000)
  37. Runco, M. A., "Creativity : Theories and themes : Research, development, and practice" (2014), Elsevier
  38. Runco, M. A., "A closer look at the creativity gap and why students are less creative at school than outside of school", Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, pp.242~249 (2017)
  39. Simonton, D. K., "Handbook of personality: Theory and research", pp.629~652 (1999), Guilford
  40. Simpson, T., "Interdisciplinary by design", Mechanical Engineering, 130(9), pp.30~ (2008)
  41. Sternberg, R. J., "Mental self-government : A theory of intellectual styles and their development", Human development, 31(4), pp.197~224 (1988)
  42. Zhang, L. F., "Are thinking styles and personality types related?", Educational Psychology, 20(3), pp.271~283 (2000)
  43. Zhang, L. F., "Thinking styles, self-esteem, and extracurricular experiences", International Journal of Psychology, 36(2), pp.100~107 (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

공과대학생의 일상적 창의성과 사고양식의 관계윤경미, 황순희한국교양교육학회 · 교양교육연구2017 · 제11권 제2호공과대학생의 일상적 창의성이 팀워크 역량에 미치는 영향윤경미, 황순희한국공학교육학회 · 공학교육연구2020 · 제23권 제5호공과대학 학생들의 창의성교육에 관한 인식김동호, 김영전, 임철일한국공학교육학회 · 공학교육연구2012 · 제15권 제2호공과대학생의 일상적 창의성과 보편적 의사소통능력의 상관관계 탐색윤경미, 황순희한국교양교육학회 · 교양교육연구2015 · 제9권 제3호공과대학생의 사고양식 탐색윤경미, 황순희한국공학교육학회 · 공학교육연구2017 · 제20권 제5호대학생의 제 변인에 따른 창의적 능력 비교김은경, 유경훈, 이경화한국창의력교육학회 · 창의력교육연구2012 · 제12권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

컴퓨터 초보자 소프트웨어교육에 있어서의 UML 도구의 적합성 연구박현석, 오지혜, 오유란, 김연우pp. 3-11공학교육에서의 Active Learning 교수-학습 모형 개발 연구강동희, 김나영pp. 12-20비전공자 컴퓨터교육과 학습보조 자료의 활용나정은pp. 21-274차 산업혁명을 대비하는 융합교육과정에 관한 연구 : 힐링바이오공유대학 융합치유전공 중심으로송덕근, 권혁, 이진홍pp. 28-39동아시아 공(工) 개념의 기원과 근대적 재구성한경희pp. 51-63
원문 보기