본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

화학사고 대응을 위한 시간별 급성노출기준 참고치 산정 - 폼알데하이드 사례 -

Estimation of Temporal Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Emergency Response - A Brief Case using Formaldehyde -

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives: This study aimed to provide temporal Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGL) for a hazardous substance as a pilot study. Methods: As one of the substances designated by the Korea Ministry of Environment as requiring preparations for potential accidents, formaldehyde was selected to estimate the AEGLs. The calculation was based on Haber’s formula (Cn ×t=k) using valid toxicity data (for humans/animals). A total of 96 points of AEGL levels were provided using an interval of five minutes over eight hours. Results: The AEGL-1 and 2 values were constant for the entire exposure duration at 0.9 ppm and 14 ppm, respectively. The values were obtained from clinical/animal tests, and the adaptation effect after a given exposure duration was also considered. AEGL-3 was based on animal toxicity data, and it was estimated from 127 ppm for the initial five minutes to 35 ppm for eight hours. Conclusions: More specific AEGL levels for formaldehyde could be obtained in this study using toxicity data with Haber’s formula. Based on this methodology, it would be also possible to estimate AEGL levels that can be used at the scene of a chemical accident for other substances requiring preparation for potential accidents.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to provide temporal Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGL) for a hazardous substance as a pilot study. Methods: As one of the substances designated by the Korea Ministry of Environment as requiring preparations for potential accidents, formaldehyde was selected to estimate the AEGLs. The calculation was based on Haber’s formula (Cn ×t=k) using valid toxicity data (for humans/animals). A total of 96 points of AEGL levels were provided using an interval of five minutes over eight hours. Results: The AEGL-1 and 2 values were constant for the entire exposure duration at 0.9 ppm and 14 ppm, respectively. The values were obtained from clinical/animal tests, and the adaptation effect after a given exposure duration was also considered. AEGL-3 was based on animal toxicity data, and it was estimated from 127 ppm for the initial five minutes to 35 ppm for eight hours. Conclusions: More specific AEGL levels for formaldehyde could be obtained in this study using toxicity data with Haber’s formula. Based on this methodology, it would be also possible to estimate AEGL levels that can be used at the scene of a chemical accident for other substances requiring preparation for potential accidents.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 이현진, "회귀곡선을 이용한 단시간 노출에 대한 AEGL의 적용", 한국가스학회지, 21(5), pp.77~82 (2017), 한국가스학회[DOI]
  2. Öberg M, "Discrepancy among acute guideline levels for emergency response", J Hazard Mater, 184(1-3), pp.439~447 (2010)
  3. Yoon C, "Current state of regulatory chemical management Part 3-Chemical exposure limits in case of emergencies (releases, accidents)", Monthly Occup Health, pp.22~31 (2016)
  4. "Public Exposure Guidelines"[URL]
  5. "Chemical Substances Control Act-Article 44 (Response at Scene of Chemical Accidents)"[URL]
  6. Background survey on preparing for recovery criteria after chemical accidents (1), "Kim SY", National Institute of Chemical Safety, 1~33, pp.Research Report No. NICS-RP2016-2 (2016)
  7. "Current status of chemical accidents and cases"[URL]
  8. A study on the methodology for risk assessment after chemical exposure and recommendation of acute exposure guideline level (1), "Lee CS", National Institute of Chemical Safety, 4~6, pp.Research Report No. NICS-RP2020-4 (2020)
  9. Kim KH, "Exposure to formaldehyde and its potential human health hazards", J Environ Sci Health C, 29(4), pp.277~299 (2011)
  10. "Health and Environmental Effects Profile for Formaldehyde. EPA/600/X-85/362 (NTIS PB88174958)"[URL]
  11. "Toxicological Profile for Formaldehyde. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR)-United States Department of Public Health Service"[URL]
  12. Bender J, "Eye irritation response of humans to formaldehyde", Am Ind Hyg Assoc J, 44(6), pp.463~465 (1983)
  13. Sim VM, "Effect of possible smog irritants on human subjects", JAMA, 165(15), pp.1908~1913 (1957)
  14. Nagorny P, "On the general toxic and allergic action of formaldehyde", Gig Tr Prof Zabol, (1), pp.27~30 (1979)
  15. "Interim Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Formaldehyde (CAS Reg. No. 50-00-0)"[URL]
  16. Miller FJ, "Haber’s rule : a special case in a family of curves relating concentration and duration of exposure to a fixed level of response for a given endpoint", Toxicology, 149(1), pp.21~34 (2000)
  17. Ten Berge W, "Concentration-time mortality response relationship of irritant and systemically acting vapours and gases", J Hazard Mater, 13(3), pp.301~309 (1986)
  18. National Research Council, "Standing operating procedures for developing acute exposure guideline levels for hazardous chemicals", pp.92~110 (2001), National Academy of Science
  19. Maronpot RR, "National Toxicology Program nomenclature for hepatoproliferative lesions of rats", Toxicol Pathol, 14(2), pp.263~273 (1986)
  20. Morgan DO, "Purification and characterization of the receptor for insulin-like growth factor I", Biochemistry, 25(19), pp.5560~5564 (1986)
  21. Rusch GM, "A 26-week inhalation toxicity study with formaldehyde in the monkey, rat, and hamster", Toxicol. Appl Pharmacol., 68(3), pp.329~343 (1983)
  22. Woutersen R, "Inhalation toxicity of acetaldehyde in rats. IV. Progression and regression of nasal lesions after discontinuation of exposure", Toxicology, 47(3), pp.295~305 (1987)
  23. Barnes E, "The determination of formaldehyde in air", J Ind Hyg Toxicol, 24(10), pp.10~17 (1942)
  24. Gaylor DW, "The use of Haber’s law in standard setting and risk assessment", Toxicology, 149(1), pp.17~19 (2000)
  25. 이지윤, "화학사고 시 수용체 보호를 위한 독성끝점 농도와 급성독성 자료를 활용한 우려농도 예측값 조사", 한국환경보건학회지, 44(1), pp.44~54 (2018), 한국환경보건학회

관련 논문AI추천

화학사고 시 수용체 보호를 위한 독성끝점 농도와 급성독성 자료를 활용한 우려농도 예측값 조사김순신, 김정곤, 류지성, 양원호, 윤준헌, 이지윤, 지경희한국환경보건학회 · 한국환경보건학회지2018 · 제44권 제1호화학사고물질 노출에 따른 피해지역 주민 건강위해성평가: 폼알데하이드 사례를 중심으로박시현, 박지훈, 이철민, 이청수, 임희빈, 조용성, 황승율한국환경보건학회 · 한국환경보건학회지2021 · 제47권 제2호화학사고 후 주민복귀 및 피해복구 시점 결정을 위한 인체지표 개발김호현, 박상희, 양준용, 이준상, 이현석, 조용성, 허정무한국환경보건학회 · 한국환경보건학회지2020 · 제46권 제5호산업계 배출수에서 포름알데히드의 배출허용기준 설정방안 고찰김용석, 김재훈, 류덕희, 신기식, 신진수, 정동환한국환경영향평가학회 · 환경영향평가2013 · 제22권 제3호수환경 화학사고로 인지되는 폐수종말처리장 유해화학물질 유출기준 농도와 유입 차단 농도 설정김성준, 이상진, 이호영, 최성득한국환경분석학회 · 환경분석과 독성보건2019 · 제22권 제4호근로자 건강보호목표수준 제안을 위한 이소프렌의 용량-반응 평가 적용연구김현지, 신동천, 양지연, 이용진, 임영욱한국보건정보통계학회 · 보건정보통계학회지2011 · 제36권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)