본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

화학사고물질 노출에 따른 피해지역 주민 건강위해성평가: 폼알데하이드 사례를 중심으로

Health Risk Assessment for Residents after Exposure to Chemical Accidents: Formaldehyde

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives: Acute exposure to high concentrations of chemicals can occur when a chemical accident takes place. As such exposure can cause ongoing environmental pollution, such as in the soil and groundwater, there is a need for a tool that can assess health effects in the long term. The purpose of this study was assessing the health risks of residents living near a chemical accident site due to long-term exposure while considering the temporal concentration changes of the toxic chemicals leaked during the accident until their extinction in the environment using a multimedia environmental dynamics model. Methods: A health risk assessment was conducted on three cases of formaldehyde chemical accidents. In this study, health risk assessment was performed using a multimedia environmental dynamics model that considers the behavior of the atmosphere, soil, and water. In addition, the extinction period of formaldehyde in the environment was regarded as extinction in the environment when the concentration in the air and soil fell below the background concentration prior to the accident. The subjects of health risk assessment were classified into four groups according to age: 0-9 years old, 10-18 years old, 19-64 years old, and over 65 years old. Carcinogenic risk assessment by respiratory exposure and non-carcinogenic risk assessment by soil intake were conducted as well. Results: In the assessment of carcinogenic risk due to respiratory exposure, the excess carcinogenic risk did not exceed 1.0×10−6 in all three chemical accidents, so there was no health effect due to the formaldehyde chemical accident. As a result of the evaluation of non-carcinogenic risk due to soil intake, none of the three chemical accidents had a risk index of 1, so there was no health effect. For all three chemical accidents, the excess cancer risk and hazard index were the highest in the age group 0-9. Next, 10-18 years old, 65 years old or older, and 19-64 years old showed the highest risk. Conclusion: This study considers environmental changes after a chemical accident occurs and until the substance disappears from the environment. It also conducts a health risk assessment by reflecting the characteristics of the long-term persistence and concentration change over time. It is thought that it is of significance as a health risk assessment study reflecting the exposure characteristics of the accident substance for an actual chemical accident.

Abstract

Objectives: Acute exposure to high concentrations of chemicals can occur when a chemical accident takes place. As such exposure can cause ongoing environmental pollution, such as in the soil and groundwater, there is a need for a tool that can assess health effects in the long term. The purpose of this study was assessing the health risks of residents living near a chemical accident site due to long-term exposure while considering the temporal concentration changes of the toxic chemicals leaked during the accident until their extinction in the environment using a multimedia environmental dynamics model. Methods: A health risk assessment was conducted on three cases of formaldehyde chemical accidents. In this study, health risk assessment was performed using a multimedia environmental dynamics model that considers the behavior of the atmosphere, soil, and water. In addition, the extinction period of formaldehyde in the environment was regarded as extinction in the environment when the concentration in the air and soil fell below the background concentration prior to the accident. The subjects of health risk assessment were classified into four groups according to age: 0-9 years old, 10-18 years old, 19-64 years old, and over 65 years old. Carcinogenic risk assessment by respiratory exposure and non-carcinogenic risk assessment by soil intake were conducted as well. Results: In the assessment of carcinogenic risk due to respiratory exposure, the excess carcinogenic risk did not exceed 1.0×10−6 in all three chemical accidents, so there was no health effect due to the formaldehyde chemical accident. As a result of the evaluation of non-carcinogenic risk due to soil intake, none of the three chemical accidents had a risk index of 1, so there was no health effect. For all three chemical accidents, the excess cancer risk and hazard index were the highest in the age group 0-9. Next, 10-18 years old, 65 years old or older, and 19-64 years old showed the highest risk. Conclusion: This study considers environmental changes after a chemical accident occurs and until the substance disappears from the environment. It also conducts a health risk assessment by reflecting the characteristics of the long-term persistence and concentration change over time. It is thought that it is of significance as a health risk assessment study reflecting the exposure characteristics of the accident substance for an actual chemical accident.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 전준민, "일부 공단지역 PM2.5에 부착된 중금속 노출에 의한 건강위해성평가", 한국환경보건학회지, 36(4), pp.294~305 (2010), 한국환경보건학회
  2. 임지영, "2006~2015년 동안 국내 유해화학물질 배출량 변화에 관한 연구", 한국환경보건학회지, 44(1), pp.15~23 (2018), 한국환경보건학회
  3. 김옥, "서산지역에서 연료연소에 의해 배출된 benzo(a)pyrene의 배출량 산정", 한국환경보건학회지, 43(1), pp.55~63 (2017), 한국환경보건학회
  4. 김현지, "주요 산업단지의 화학물질 배출량 특성에 관한 연구", 한국환경보건학회지, 44(6), pp.515~523 (2018), 한국환경보건학회
  5. 임지영, "국내 화학물질 배출량 특성에 관한 연구: 악취물질 중심으로", 한국환경보건학회지, 45(5), pp.465~473 (2019), 한국환경보건학회
  6. Im JY, "A study on the characteristics of hazardous pollutant emissions in Korea from 2007 to 2016", Int J Environ Res, 14, pp.335~346 (2020)
  7. "Chemical Information System"[URL]
  8. United State Environmental Protection Agency, "Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment", Federal Register, 51(185), pp.33992~34003 (1986)
  9. United State Environmental Protection Agency, "Risk assessment guidance for superfund: volume I, Human Health Evaluation Manual, EPA", 540, 00.2, 1989[DOI]
  10. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, "Human risk assessment of single exposure in chemical incidents: present situation and emerging chemical incident scenarios" (2013), RIVM
  11. Lim YW, "Exposure assessment and health risk of poly-brominated diphenyl ether (PBDE) flame retardants in the indoor environment of elementary school students in Korea", Science of the Total Environment, 470-471, pp.1376~1389 (2014)
  12. Park SH, "Health risk assessment for multimedia exposure of formaldehyde emitted by chemical accident", Environ Sci Pollut Res (2020)
  13. 윤단기, "실내·외 실시간 모니터링을 활용한 폼알데하이드 및 미세먼지(PM10, PM2.5)의 거주시간별 노출 및 위해도 평가", 한국환경보건학회지, 45(6), pp.646~657 (2019), 한국환경보건학회
  14. "Quantum Geographic Information System"[URL]
  15. United State Environmental Protection Agency, "Interim Acute Exposure Guideline Level (AEGLs) for Formaldehyde", ~ (2008)
  16. Hearn JD, "Deposition of Cl2 on soils during outdoor releases", Journal of Hazardous Materials, 252, pp.107~114 (2013)
  17. Multi-Media and Multi-Pathway Aggregate Risk Assessment (II)-Formaldehyde, "Ministry of Environment", ~ (2012)
  18. Ministry of Environment, "Korean exposure factors handbook for children", ~ (2016)
  19. Ministry of Environment, "Korean exposure factors handbook", ~ (2007)
  20. United State Environmental Protection Agency, "Exposure Factors Handbook Chapter 5(Update): Soil and Dust Ingestion, EPA", 600, 384F, 2017[DOI]
  21. Statistics Korea (KOSTAT), "2017 Life Time Table", ~ (2018)

관련 논문AI추천

충청·전라지역 산업단지 주변지역에서의 벤젠 인체 위해성 평가김희갑, 신용승, 이성우, 이종현, 장용철한국환경영향평가학회 · 환경영향평가2011 · 제20권 제4호CalTOX 모델을 이용한 벤젠 종합위해성평가의 불확실성 분석과 민감도 분석김옥, 박상현, 박창용, 송영호, 이민우, 이진헌, 최진하한국환경보건학회 · 한국환경보건학회지2020 · 제46권 제2호실내·외 실시간 모니터링을 활용한 폼알데하이드 및 미세먼지(PM10, PM2.5)의 거주시간별 노출 및 위해도 평가공혜관, 박시현, 윤단기, 이정섭, 이철민, 이혜원, 임희빈, 홍형진, 남궁선주한국환경보건학회 · 한국환경보건학회지2019 · 제45권 제6호다매체 노출을 고려한 Perchloroethylene의 인체위해성평가연구김탁수, 김필제, 서정관, 조아름, 최경희한국환경보건학회 · 한국환경보건학회지2014 · 제40권 제5호민감계층 이용시설의 폼알데하이드 노출로 인한 건강위해성 평가김소윤, 손정원, 유상웅, 유숙진, 정현철한국환경분석학회 · 환경분석과 독성보건2023 · 제26권 제4호인구집단 위해도 평가 방법을 활용한 유해화학물질 배경 노출 영향 보정 방법 개발 -울산공단주변을 대상으로-박시현, 이철민, 이혜원, 임희빈, 최길용, 남궁선주한국환경보건학회 · 한국환경보건학회지2019 · 제45권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)