과학연구자의 연구환경에서 인지편향적 요소를 진단하는 설문도구 개발
Development of a Survey Tool to Diagnose Cognitive Biases in Science Researchers' Research Environment
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to develop a survey tool that diagnoses cognitive biases in a scientist's research environment. The survey questions were developed based on 40 cognitive biases that are believed to be present in the scientists' research environment. A survey of 83 scientist was conducted to verify the statistical validity and reliability of the developed questions. The questions developed can be used as a single-dimensional measurement tool. The survey tool demonstrates an appropriate level of statistical validity and reliability. This survey tool can be used to measure science researchers' sensitivity to cognitive bias. It can also be useful for checking the research environment.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to develop a survey tool that diagnoses cognitive biases in a scientist's research environment. The survey questions were developed based on 40 cognitive biases that are believed to be present in the scientists' research environment. A survey of 83 scientist was conducted to verify the statistical validity and reliability of the developed questions. The questions developed can be used as a single-dimensional measurement tool. The survey tool demonstrates an appropriate level of statistical validity and reliability. This survey tool can be used to measure science researchers' sensitivity to cognitive bias. It can also be useful for checking the research environment.
참고문헌 (22)
- Baron, J., "Heuristics and biases in diagnostic reasoning: II. Congruence, information, and certainty", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42, pp.88~110 (1988)
- Boone, W. J., "Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences" (2014), Springer
- Buehler, R., "Exploring the"planning fallacy" : Why people underestimate their task completion times", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, pp.366~ (1994)
- DeVellis, R. F., "Scale Devlopment : Theory and Applications" (2003), Sage Publications
- Fauth, B., "Student ratings of teaching quality in primary school : Dimensions and prediction of student outcomes", Learning and Instruction, 29, pp.1~9 (2014)
- Haselton, M. G., "The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology: Integrations", pp.968~987 (2016), John Wiley & Sons, Inc
- 홍남인, "예비교사를 위한 PBL 기반 과학·기술 융합 프로그램개발 및 적용", Brain, Digital, & Learning, 10(4), pp.431~442 (2020), 뇌·AI기반교육연구소[DOI]
- Ioannidis, J. P., "Why most published research findings are false", PLoS Medicine, 2, pp.e124~ (2005)
- 정해림, "하브루타를 활용한 기후변화 교수학습이고등학생의 과학에 대한 태도에 미치는 영향", Brain, Digital, & Learning, 10(4), pp.443~452 (2020), 뇌·AI기반교육연구소[DOI]
- Kahan, D. M., "Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection: An experimental study", Judgment and Decision making, 8, pp.407~424 (2012)
- Kahneman, D., "Subjective probability : A judgment of representativeness", Cognitive Psychology, 3, pp.430~454 (1972)
- Klayman, J., "Varieties of confirmation bias", Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 32, pp.385~418 (1995)
- Kunda, Z., "The case for motivated reasoning", Psychological Bulletin, 108, pp.480~498 (1990)
- Messick, S., "Validity of psychological assessment : Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning", American Psychologist, 50, pp.741~749 (1995)
- 오현진, "문제중심학습 모형을 적용한 STEM 교육 프로그램 개발 및 적용: 중학교의 ‘우주탐사’ 주제를 중심으로", Brain, Digital, & Learning, 10(4), pp.523~533 (2020), 뇌·AI기반교육연구소[DOI]
- Rusmana, A. N., "Debiasing overconfidence among indonesian undergraduate students in the biology classroom: An intervention study of the KAAR model", AsiaPacific Science Education, 6, pp.228~254 (2020)
- Schlösser, T., "How unaware are the unskilled? Empirical tests of the"signal extraction"counterexplanation for the Dunning–Kruger effect in self-evaluation of performance", Journal of Economic Psychology, 39, pp.85~100 (2013)
- Scott, J., "Overconfidence bias in international stock prices", The Journal of Portfolio Management, 29, pp.80~89 (2003)
- Topol, E. J., "Failing the public health-rofecoxib, Merck, and the FDA", New England Journal of Medicine, 351, pp.1707~1709 (2004)
- Tversky, A., "Availability : A heuristic for judging frequency and probability", Cognitive Psychology, 5, pp.207~232 (1973)
- Tversky, A., "Judgment under uncertainty : Heuristics and Biases", Science, 185, pp.1124~1131 (1974)
- Wright, B. D., "Reasonable mean-square-fit values", Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8, pp.370~ (1994)