본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Addressing Challenges to a Systematic Thinking Pattern of Scientists: A Literature Review of Cognitive Bias in Scientific Work

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Scientist has an essential role for making discoveries and come across inventions. However, the way of doing science can obstructed due to the human limitation and individual reasoning. Knowing the process of system thinking is essentials approach to understand how science product are influenced by various factors. Research on cognitive biases can help this interest to understand this limitation among scientists. We discussed about scientist activities that considers on history and philosophy of science and the sustainable future requiring creative problem solving which can be very susceptible to cognitive biases. Another attention is the multilayer of current scientific work, where scientist works individually and collaborate with the colleagues. Thus, this paper discusses the framework of cognitive biases related to scientist works. Alternatively, weighing such consideration, the new framework was made by listing the biases among scientific work. We close with the recommendation of validating this framework to become of potential construct that would be helpful for further study.

Abstract

Scientist has an essential role for making discoveries and come across inventions. However, the way of doing science can obstructed due to the human limitation and individual reasoning. Knowing the process of system thinking is essentials approach to understand how science product are influenced by various factors. Research on cognitive biases can help this interest to understand this limitation among scientists. We discussed about scientist activities that considers on history and philosophy of science and the sustainable future requiring creative problem solving which can be very susceptible to cognitive biases. Another attention is the multilayer of current scientific work, where scientist works individually and collaborate with the colleagues. Thus, this paper discusses the framework of cognitive biases related to scientist works. Alternatively, weighing such consideration, the new framework was made by listing the biases among scientific work. We close with the recommendation of validating this framework to become of potential construct that would be helpful for further study.

참고문헌 (71)

  1. Aczel, B., "Is it time for studying real-life debiasing? Evaluation of the effectiveness of an analogical intervention technique", Frontiers in psychology, 6, pp.1120~ (2015)
  2. Allmark, P., "A classical view of the theory-practice gap in nursing", Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22, pp.18~23 (1995)
  3. Auweele, Y. V., "Judging bias in synchronized swimming : Open feedback leads to nonperformance-based conformity", Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26, pp.561~571 (2004)
  4. Aydemir, D., "Identifying and solving scientific problems in the medicine : Key to become a competent scientist", Turkish Journal of Biochemistry, 45 (2020)
  5. Babcock, L., "Explaining bargaining impasse : The role of self-serving biases", Journal of Economic perspectives, 11, pp.109~126 (1997)
  6. "“Conitive bias codex,” cognitive biases" (2021)[URL]
  7. Blatti, J. L., "Systems thinking in science education and outreach toward a sustainable future", Journal of Chemical Education, 96, pp.2852~2862 (2019)
  8. Boen, F., "Open feedback in gymnastic judging causes conformity bias based on informational influencing", Journal of Sports Sciences, 26, pp.621~628 (2008)
  9. Buldu, M., "Young children's perceptionsof scientists : A preliminary study", Educational Research, 48, pp.121~132 (2006)
  10. Carmeli, A., "Leadership, creative problem-solving capacity, and creative performance : The importance of knowledge sharing", Human Resource Management, 52, pp.95~121 (2013)
  11. Carter, R. F., "Bandwagon and sandbagging effects : Some measures of dissonance reduction", Public Opinion Quarterly, 23, pp.279~287 (1959)
  12. Chrysikou, E. G., "Following the wrong footsteps: Fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, pp.1134~ (2005)
  13. Chrysikou, E. G., "Functional fixedness in creative thinking tasks depends on stimulus modality", Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10, pp.425~ (2016)
  14. De Langhe, B., "The dangers of categorical thinking : We're hardwired to sort information into buckets-and that can hamper our ability to make good decisions", Harvard Business Review, 97, pp.80~92 (2019)
  15. Duncker, K., "On problem-solving", Psychological Monographs, 58 (1945)
  16. Edwards, W., "Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research", Psychological Review, 70, pp.193~ (1963)
  17. Ellis, G., "Cognitive Biases in Visualizations" (2018), Springer
  18. Fiske, S. T., "What we know now about bias and intergroup conflict, the problem of the century", Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, pp.123~128 (2002)
  19. Frederick, S., "Cognitive reflection and decision making", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, pp.25~42 (2005)
  20. Galai, D., "The"ostrich effect"and the relationship between the liquidity and the yields of financial assets", The Journal of Business, 79, pp.2741~2759 (2006)
  21. Gelman, S. A., "The Essential Child: Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought" (2003), Oxford University Press
  22. German, T. P., "Functional fixedness in a technologically sparse culture", Psychological Science, 16, pp.1~5 (2005)
  23. Glynn, S. M., "Science motivation questionnaire II : Validation with science majors and nonscience majors", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, pp.1159~1176 (2011)
  24. Goddard, K., "Automation bias : A systematic review of frequency, effect mediators, and mitigators", Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 19, pp.121~127 (2012)
  25. Goddard, K., "Automation bias : Empirical results assessing influencing factors", International journal of medical informatics, 83, pp.368~375 (2014)
  26. Hacker, D. J., "Explaining calibration accuracy in classroom contexts : The effects of incentives, reflection, and explanatory style", Metacognition and Learning, 3, pp.101~121 (2008)
  27. Haselton, M. G., "The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology", pp.1~20 (2015)
  28. Hilbert, M., "Toward a synthesis of cognitive biases : How noisy information processing can bias human decision making", Psychological Bulletin, 138, pp.211~ (2012)
  29. Hinnosaar, M., "Authority Bias", ~ (2012)
  30. Howard, J, "Cognitive Errors and Diagnostic Mistakes", pp.21~56 (2019), Springer
  31. Kahneman, D., "Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment" (2021), Brown Spark
  32. Kahneman, D., "A perspective on judgment and choice : Mapping bounded rationality", American Psychologist, 58, pp.697~ (2003)
  33. Kahneman, D, "Thinking, Fast and Slow" (2011), Macmillan
  34. Kahneman, D., "Subjective probability : A judgment of representativeness", Cognitive Psychology, 3, pp.430~454 (1972)
  35. Kahneman, D., "On the reality of cognitive illusions", ~ (1996)
  36. Kahneman, D., "Anomalies : The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, pp.193~206 (1991)
  37. Kahneman, D., "Before you make that big decision", Harvard Business Review, 89, pp.50~60 (2011)
  38. Kahneman, D., "Noise", Harvard Business Review, 38~46 (2016)
  39. Kornilova, T., "Specifics of personal prerequisites of decision-making process (based on the framing effect) in doctors and teachers sample groups", Journal of Higher School of Economics, 15, pp.22~38 (2018)
  40. Liedtka, J., "Perspective : Linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32, pp.925~938 (2015)
  41. Loewenstein, G., "Projection bias in predicting future utility", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, pp.1209~1248 (2003)
  42. Lonergan, D. C., "Evaluative aspects of creative thought : Effects of appraisal and revision standards", Creativity Research Journal, 16, pp.231~246 (2004)
  43. Matthews, M. R., "Science Teaching: The Contribution of History and Philosophy of Science" (2014), Routledge
  44. Mortell, M., "Physician ‘defiance’ towards hand hygiene compliance: Is there a theory–practice–ethics gap?", Journal of the Saudi Heart Association, 25, pp.203~208 (2013)
  45. Moscovici, S., "Social influence, conformity bias, and the study of active minorities", Advances in experimental Social Psychology, 6, pp.149~202 (1972)
  46. Mumford, M. D., "Handbook of Organizational Creativity", pp.3~16 (2012), Academic Press
  47. Mussweiler, T., "Overcoming the inevitable anchoring effect : Considering the opposite compensates for selective accessibility", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, pp.1142~1150 (2000)
  48. Nadeau, R., "New evidence about the existence of a bandwagon effect in the opinion formation process", International Political Science Review, 14, pp.203~213 (1993)
  49. Nietfeld, J. L., "The effect of distributed monitoring exercises and feedback on performance, monitoring accuracy, and self-efficacy", Metacognition and Learning, 1, pp.159~ (2006)
  50. Oswald, M. E., "Cognitive Illusions, A Handbook on Fallacies and Biases in Thinking, Judgement and Memory" (2004), Psychology Press
  51. Plous, S, "The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making" (1993), Mcgraw-Hill Book Company
  52. Quita, I. N., "What is a scientist? Perspectives of teachers of color", Multicultural Education, 11, pp.29~ (2003)
  53. Rachmatullah, A., "Examining high-school students’ overconfidence bias in biology exam : A focus on the effects of country and gender", International Journal of Science Education, 41, pp.652~673 (2019)
  54. Reiter-Palmon, R., "Leadership and creativity : Understanding leadership from a creative problem-solving perspective", The Leadership Quarterly, 15, pp.55~77 (2004)
  55. Reiter-Palmon, R., "Problem identification and construction: What do we know, what is the future?", Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, pp.43~ (2009)
  56. Rogers, E. M, "Diffusion of Innovations" (2010), Simon and Schuster
  57. Rusmana, A. N., "Debiasing overconfidence among Indonesian undergraduate students in the biology classroom : An intervention study of the KAAR model", AsiaPacific Science Education, 6, pp.228~254 (2020)
  58. Samuelson, W., "Status quo bias in decision making", Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, pp.7~59 (1988)
  59. Scheufle, D. A., "Twenty-five years of the spiral of silence : A conceptual review and empirical outlook", International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12, pp.3~28 (2000)
  60. Schmitt-Beck, R., "Bandwagon effect, The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication", 1~5 (2015)
  61. Skitka, L. J., "Does automation bias decision-making", International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 51, pp.991~1006 (1999)
  62. Slaughter, J. E., "The decoy effect as a covert influence tactic", Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24, pp.249~266 (2011)
  63. Slaughter, J. E., "Decoy effects and attribute-level inferences", Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, pp.823~ (1999)
  64. Soll, J. B., "Outsmart your own biases", Harvard Business Review, 93, pp.64~71 (2015)
  65. Sunstein, C. R., "Probability neglect : Emotions, worst cases, and law", The Yale Law Journal, 112, pp.61~107 (2002)
  66. Todd, E. M., "Bias and bias remediation in creative problem-solving : Managing biases through forecasting", Creativity Research Journal, 31, pp.1~14 (2019)
  67. Tversky, A., "Judgment under uncertainty : Heuristics and biases", Science, 185, pp.1124~1131 (1974)
  68. Valdez, A. C., "Cognitive Biases in Visualizations", pp.13~27 (2018), Springer
  69. van Geene, K., "Raising awareness of cognitive biases during diagnostic reasoning", Perspectives on Medical Education, 5, pp.182~185 (2016)
  70. Webster, D. M., "Individual differences in need for cognitive closure", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, pp.1049~ (1994)
  71. Williams, J. D., "How Science Works: Teaching and Learning in the Science Classroom" (2011), A&C Black

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)