본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

합리적 문제해결을 저해하는 인지편향과 과학교육을 통한 탈인지편향 방법 탐색

Exploring Cognitive Biases Limiting Rational Problem Solving and Debiasing Methods Using Science Education

하민수
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)|2016.12|한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education)|제36권 제6호|pp. 935-946|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.6.0935

0

조회

0

다운로드

27

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

인지편향cognitive bias의사결정decision-making인지심리학과학철학science educationphilosophy of science과학교육cognitive psychology
주제분류교육학

초록

이 연구의 목적은 과학교육과 관련된 인지편향을 확인하고 과학교 육을 통하여 인지편향을 줄일 수 있는 방법을 확인하기 위하여 계획 되었다. 문헌조사를 통하여 연구되어진 인지편향을 수집하였고, 과학 학습의 관련성이 높은 인지편향을 과학교육전문가와의 토론을 통하여 추출하였다. 연구 결과 합리적 인과관계추론을 방해하는 인지편향, 다양한 정보와 결론 생성을 방해하는 인지편향, 자기반성적 학습을 방해하는 인지편향, 자기 주도적 의사결정을 방해하는 인지편향, 범주 제한적 사고를 조장하는 인지편향의 다섯 가지로 분류하였고, 총 29개의 인지편향들을 조사하였다. 합리적 인과관계추론의 방해하는 인지편향은 목적론적 사고, 가용성 편향, 착각적 상관, 클러스터 착각 이었다. 문제해결에서 다양한 정보의 탐색을 방해하는 인지편향은 선택적 지각, 실험자 편향, 확증편향, 단순 사고 효과, 주의 편향, 신념 편향, 실용 오류, 기능적 고착, 틀 효과가 있었다. 자기반성적 학습을 방해하는 인지편향은 과도한 자신감 편향, 우월성 편향, 계획 오류, 기본적 귀인 오류, 더닝-크루거 효과, 사후확신편향, 맹점편향을 확인 하였다. 자기 주도적 의사결정을 방해하는 인지편향은 동조효과, 편승효과, 집단사고, 권위에 호소, 정보편향이 있다. 마지막으로 범주 제한적 사고를 조장하는 인지편향으로는 심리학적 본질주의, 고정관 념, 의인화, 외집단 동질성 편향이 있었다. 연구된 인지편향에 대한 심리학적 특징들과 과학교수-학습방법들을 토대로 인지편향을 줄이고 역량을 향상시킬 수 있는 수업 방법에 대해서 논의한다.

Abstract

This study aims to explore cognitive biases relating the core competences of science and instructional strategy in reducing the level of cognitive biases. The literature review method was used to explore cognitive biases and science education experts discussed the relevance of cognitive biases to science education. Twenty nine cognitive biases were categorized into five groups (limiting rational causal inference, limiting diverse information search, limiting self-regulated learning, limiting self-directed decision making, and category-limited thinking). The cognitive biases in limiting rational causal inference group are teleological thinking, availability heuristic, illusory correlation, and clustering illusion. The cognitive biases in limiting diverse information search group are selective perception, experimenter bias, confirmation bias, mere thought effect, attentional bias, belief bias, pragmatic fallacy, functional fixedness, and framing effect. The cognitive biases in limiting self-regulated learning group are overconfidence bias, better-than-average bias, planning fallacy, fundamental attribution error, Dunning-Kruger effect, hindsight bias, and blind-spot bias. The cognitive biases in limiting self-directed decision-making group are acquiescence effect, bandwagon effect, group-think, appeal to authority bias, and information bias. Lastly, the cognitive biases in category-limited thinking group are psychological essentialism, stereotyping, anthropomorphism, and outgroup homogeneity bias. The instructional strategy to reduce the level of cognitive biases is disused based on the psychological characters of cognitive biases reviewed in this study and related science education methods.

참고문헌 (94)

  1. Ajzen, I., "Information bias in contingent valuation : effects of personal relevance, quality of information, and motivational orientation", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30(1), pp.43~57 (1996)
  2. Alicke, M. D., "Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), pp.804~825 (1995)
  3. Amodio, D. M., "Stereotyping and evaluation in implicit race bias : evidence for independent constructs and unique effects on behavior", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), pp.652~661 (2006)
  4. Barber, T. X., "Five attempts to replicate the experimenter bias effect", Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33(1), pp.1~6 (1969)
  5. Bartov, H., "Can student be taught to distinguish between teleological and causal explanations?", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15(6), pp.567~572 (1978)
  6. Berner, E. S., "Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine", The American Journal of Medicine, 121(5), pp.S2~S23 (2008)
  7. Buehler, R., "Exploring the"planning fallacy" : Why people underestimate their task completion times", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(3), pp.366~381 (1994)
  8. Chapman, L. J., "Illusory correlation as an obstacle to the use of valid psychodiagnostic signs", Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74(3), pp.271~ (1969)
  9. Chi, M. T. H., "The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance", pp.21~30 (2006), Cambridge University Press
  10. Clarkson, J. J., "A self-validation perspective on the mere thought effect", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(2), pp.449~454 (2011)
  11. Cooper, D., "Psychology, risk and safety", Professional Safety, 48(11), pp.39~46 (2003)
  12. Emmons, N. A., "Young children’s acceptance of within-species variation : Implications for essentialism and teaching evolution", Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 139, pp.148~160 (2015)
  13. Evans, J. S. B. T., "Thinking twice : Two minds in one brain" (2010), Oxford University Press
  14. Evans, J. S. B., "Rapid responding increases belief bias : Evidence for the dual-process theory of reasoning", Thinking & Reasoning, 11(4), pp.382~389 (2005)
  15. Fischhoff, B., "I knew it would happen : Remembered probabilities of once—future things", Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), pp.1~16 (1975)
  16. Forgas, J. P., "On being happy and mistaken : mood effects on the fundamental attribution error", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), pp.318~331 (1998)
  17. Garrett, J. W., "Human factors analysis classification system relating to human error awareness taxonomy in construction safety", Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(8), pp.754~763 (2009)
  18. Gelman, S. A., "Psychological essentialism in children", Trends in cognitive sciences, 8(9), pp.404~409 (2004)
  19. Gigerenzer, G., "On narrow norms and vague heuristics : A reply to Kahneman and Tversky(1996)", Psychological Review, 103(3), pp.592~596 (1996)
  20. Goodwin, J., "Accounting for the Appeal to the Authority of Experts", Argumentation, 25(3), pp.285~296 (2011)
  21. Gotthelf, A., "Aristotle’s conception of final causality", Review of Metaphysics, 30, pp.226~254 (1976)
  22. 하민수, "광합성 문제 해결에 대한 과잉 효능감과 과잉확신: 선다형과 서답형의 비교 연구", 한국과학교육학회지, 34(1), pp.1~9 (2014), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  23. Ha, M., "Feeling of certainty : Uncovering a missing link between knowledge and acceptance of evolution", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), pp.95~121 (2012)
  24. Hamilton, D. L., "Illusory correlation in interpersonal perception : A cognitive basis of stereotypic judgments", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12(4), pp.392~407 (1976)
  25. Haselton, M. G., "Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology", pp.724~746 (2005), Wiley
  26. Haslam, N., "Essentialist beliefs about social categories", British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(1), pp.113~127 (2000)
  27. Hernandez, I., "Disfluency disrupts the confirmation bias", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(1), pp.178~182 (2013)
  28. Hirt, E. R., "Multiple explanation : A consider-an-alternative strategy for debiasing judgments", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), pp.1069~1086 (1995)
  29. Hodgson, G. M., "Darwinism, causality and the social sciences", Journal of Economic Methodology, 11(2), pp.175~194 (2004)
  30. Janis, I. L., "Groupthink", Psychology Today, 5(6), pp.43~46 (1971)
  31. Jonas, E., "Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions : an expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(4), pp.557~571 (2001)
  32. Jungwirth, E., "The problem of teleology in biology as a problem of biology-teacher education", Journal of Biological Education, 9(6), pp.243~246 (1975)
  33. Kahneman D., "Judgment Under Uncertainty : Heuristics and Biases" (1982), Cambridge University Press
  34. Kahneman, D., "Thinking, fast and slow" (2013), Farrar, Straus and Giroux
  35. Kampourakis, K., "Children’s Intuitive teleology : Shifting the focus of evolution education research", Evolution : Education and Outreach, 5(2), pp.279~291 (2012)
  36. Kelemen, D., "Evolution challenges:Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution", pp.66~92 (2012), University Press
  37. Kelemen, D., "Intuitions about origins : Purpose and intelligent design in children’s reasoning about nature", Journal of Cognition and Development, 6(1), pp.3~31 (2005)
  38. Kelemen, D., "The human function compunction : Teleological explanation in adults", Cognition, 111(1), pp.138~143 (2009)
  39. Kelemen, D., "Why things happen : teleological explanation in parent-child conversations", Developmental Psychology, 41(1), pp.251~264 (2005)
  40. Kelemen, D., "Professional physical scientists display tenacious teleological tendencies : Purpose-based reasoning as a cognitive default", Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 142(4), pp.1074~1083 (2013)
  41. Khalidi, M. A., "Natural Categories and Human Kinds : Classification in the Natural and Social Sciences" (2013), University of Chicago Press
  42. 김성훈, "학업성취도 평가에서의 오답원인 자기평가의 효과", 교육평가연구, 22(1), pp.29~56 (2009), 한국교육평가학회
  43. Koriat, A., "Reasons for confidence", Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human learning and memory, 6(2), pp.107118~ (1980)
  44. Larrick, R. P., "The MPG Illusion", Science, 320(5883), pp.1593~1594 (2008)
  45. 이현주, "집단지성 원리를 적용한 과학관련 사회·윤리적 쟁점 수업 모형의 개발", 한국과학교육학회지, 34(6), pp.523~534 (2014), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  46. 이현주, "집단지성을 강조한 과학기술 관련 사회쟁점 수업이 중학교 영재학급 학생들의 역량 함양에 미치는 효과", 한국과학교육학회지, 35(3), pp.431~442 (2015), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  47. Lavie, N., "Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control", Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 133(3), pp.339~354 (2004)
  48. Leyens, J. P., "Emotional prejudice, essentialism, and nationalism The 2002 Tajfel Lecture", European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(6), pp.703~717 (2003)
  49. Leyens, J. P., "Psychological essentialism and the differential attribution of uniquely human emotions to ingroups and outgroups", European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(4), pp.395~411 (2001)
  50. Lilienfeld, S. O., "Giving debiasing away : Can psychological research on correcting cognitive errors promote human welfare?", Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, pp.390~398 (2009)
  51. 임희준, "오비탈과 원자 모형에 대한 과학 고등학교 학생들의 이해", 열린교육연구, 12(2), pp.261~274 (2004), 한국열린교육학회
  52. Lombrozo, T., "Inferring design evidence of a preference for teleological explanations in patients with Alzheimer’s Disease", Psychological Science, 18(11), pp.999~1006 (2007)
  53. Mahalingam, R., "Culture, essentialism, immigration and representations of gender", Theory & Psychology, 15(6), pp.839~860 (2005)
  54. Markovits, H., "The belief-bias effect in the production and evaluation of logical conclusions", Memory & Cognition, 17(1), pp.11~17 (1989)
  55. Marsh, D. M., "Seeing what we want to see : Confirmation bias in animal behavior research", Ethology, 113(11), pp.1089~1098 (2007)
  56. McKenzie, C. R., "Increased sensitivity to differentially diagnostic answers using familiar materials : Implications for confirmation bias", Memory & Cognition, 34(3), pp.577~588 (2006)
  57. Meisenberg, G., "Are acquiescent and extreme response styles related to low intelligence and education?", Personality and Individual Differences, 44(7), pp.1539~1550 (2008)
  58. Milkman, K. L., "How can decision making be improved?", Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, pp.379~383 (2009)
  59. General introduction of elementary and secondary curriculum, "Ministry of Education", Seoul, Ministry of Education, ~ (2015)
  60. Morewedge, C. K., "Debiasing decisions improved decision making with a single training intervention", Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(1), pp.129~140 (2015)
  61. Mullen, B., "Perceptions of ingroup and outgroup variability : A meta-analytic integration", Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10(3), pp.233~252 (1989)
  62. Nadeau, R., "New evidence about the existence of a bandwagon effect in the opinion formation process", International Political Science Review, 14(2), pp.203~213 (1993)
  63. National Research Council, "A framework for K-12 science education : Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas" (2012), The National Academies Press
  64. Nehm, R. H., "Item feature effects in evolution assessment", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(3), pp.237~256 (2011)
  65. Nussbaum, E. M., "Argumentation, dialogue theory, and probability modeling : Alternative frameworks for argumentation research in education", Educational Psychologist, 46(2), pp.84~106 (2011)
  66. O’Brien, B., "Prime suspect: An examination of factors that aggravate and counteract confirmation bias in criminal investigations", Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 15(4), pp.315~334 (2009)
  67. Opfer, J. E., "Cognitive foundations for science assessment design : knowing what students know about evolution", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), pp.744~777 (2012)
  68. Pehrson, S., "When does national identification lead to the rejection of immigrants? Cross‐sectional and longitudinal evidence for the role of essentialist in‐group definitions", British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(1), pp.61~76 (2009)
  69. Pines, J. M., "Profiles in patient safety : confirmation bias in emergency medicine", Academic Emergency Medicine, 13(1), pp.90~94 (2006)
  70. Posner, G. J., "Accommodation of a scientific conception : Toward a theory of conceptual change", Science education, 66(2), pp.211~227 (1982)
  71. Pronin, E., "The bias blind spot : Perceptions of bias in self versus others", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(3), pp.369~381 (2002)
  72. Rassin, E., "Let’s find the evidence : An analogue study of confirmation bias in criminal investigations", Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 7(3), pp.231~246 (2010)
  73. Sá, W. C., "The domain specificity and generality of belief bias : Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill", Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, pp.497~510 (1999)
  74. Schlösser, T., "How unaware are the unskilled? Empirical tests of the"signal extraction"counterexplanation for the Dunning–Kruger effect in self-evaluation of performance", Journal of Economic Psychology, 39, pp.85~100 (2013)
  75. Schraw, G., "Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning", Research in Science Education, 36(1), pp.111~139 (2006)
  76. Schwarz, N., "Ease of retrieval as information : Another look at the availability heuristic", Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 61(2), pp.195~ (1991)
  77. Schwind, C., "Preference-inconsistent recommendations : An effective approach for reducing confirmation bias and stimulating divergent thinking?", Computers & Education, 58(2), pp.787~796 (2012)
  78. Shtulman, A., "The relation between essentialist beliefs and evolutionary reasoning", Cognitive Science, 32(6), pp.1049~1062 (2008)
  79. Simmons, R. E., "Necks‐for‐sex or competing browsers? A critique of ideas on the evolution of giraffe", Journal of Zoology, 282(1), pp.6~12 (2010)
  80. Simon, H. A., "A behavioral model of rational choice", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), pp.99~118 (1955)
  81. Sinatra, G. M., "Changing minds? Implications of conceptual change for teaching and learning about biological evolution", Evolution : Education and Outreach, 1(2), pp.189~195 (2008)
  82. Tesser, A., "Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 11", pp.289~338 (1978), Academic Press
  83. Tetlock, P. E., "Accountability : A social check on the fundamental attribution error", Social Psychology Quarterly, 48(3), pp.227~236 (1985)
  84. Tversky, A., "Availability : A heuristic for judging frequency and probability", Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), pp.207~232 (1973)
  85. Tversky, A., "Environmental Impact Assessment, Technology Assessment, and Risk Analysis", pp.107~129 (1985), Springer
  86. Van Bockstaele, B., "A review of current evidence for the causal impact of attentional bias on fear and anxiety", Psychological Bulletin, 140(3), pp.682~721 (2014)
  87. Vaughn, L. A., "Effects of uncertainty on use of the availability heuristic for self-efficacy judgments", European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, pp.407~410 (1999)
  88. Vonk, R., "Effects of outcome dependency on correspondence bias", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(3), pp.382~389 (1999)
  89. Walton, D., "Francis Bacon : Human Bias and the Four Idols", Argumentation, 13(4), pp.385~389 (1999)
  90. Walton, D. N., "Begging the question as a pragmatic fallacy", Synthese, 100(1), pp.95~131 (1994)
  91. Wang, X. T., "Social cues and verbal framing in risky choice", Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14(1), pp.1~15 (2001)
  92. Ware, E. A., "You get what you need : An examination of purpose‐based inheritance reasoning in undergraduates, preschoolers, and biological experts", Cognitive Science, 38(2), pp.197~243 (2014)
  93. Wheeler, P. R., "The effects of decision aid design on the information search strategies and confirmation bias of tax professionals", Behavioral Research in Accounting, 20(1), pp.131~145 (2008)
  94. Winman, A., "Subjective probability intervals: how to reduce overconfidence by interval evaluation", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(6), pp.1167~1175 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

과학적 사고의 걸림돌 동기기반추론 -과학기술 분야 학문후속세대들의 사례를 중심으로-신세인, 이준기, 하민수한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2018 · 제38권 제5호과학연구자의 인지편향 조절을 위한 개별화 웹기반 교육 프로그램 개발박은주, 배상우, 하민수뇌·AI기반교육연구소 · Brain, Digital, & Learning2022 · 제12권 제3호과학연구자의 연구환경에서 인지편향적 요소를 진단하는 설문도구 개발박은주, 하민수, 황효정뇌·AI기반교육연구소 · Brain, Digital, & Learning2021 · 제11권 제2호고등학생의 자기 주도적 과학탐구연구에서 나타난 어려움 탐색김가형, 하민수한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2019 · 제39권 제6호Addressing Challenges to a Systematic Thinking Pattern of Scientists: A Literature Review of Cognitive Bias in Scientific Work아이 너래사리 루스마나, 하민수, 유스티카 샤반다리, Rahmi Qurota Aini뇌·AI기반교육연구소 · Brain, Digital, & Learning2021 · 제11권 제3호인과추리가 유츄에 의한 과학 개념의 학습에 미치는 영향이영애, 이현주, 정우경, 최경희한국인지및생물심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물2004 · 제16권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)

기초공통개념으로서 에너지에 대한 3∼9학년 학생들의 문항 반응 분석강남화, 강훈식, 이준기, 맹승호, 김영민pp. 815-833과학중점고등학교 학생들의 이공계 진로동기에 대한 종단분석이준기, 하민수, 아리프 라흐마툴라흐, 신세인pp. 835-849초등예비교사의 ‘작용과 반작용’ 개념 - 이해 정도와 전형적 인식상황 분석을 중심으로 -정용재pp. 851-866대학생들의 융합형 문제 해결 활동에서 문제발견 및 과학기술 분야 활용 양상 분석백종호pp. 869-876멘토링 대화에서 나타나는 상호작용 분석을 통한 멘토 전문성에 대한 고찰이선우, 고문숙, 남정희, 이순덕pp. 877-893
원문 보기