Moral educational implications of neuroscientific research on moral decisionmaking
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, the two types of moral judgment, rational reasoning and emotional intuition,were analyzed with a focus on neuroscientific interpretation of human responses in thetrolley dilemma and footbridge dilemma. Based on such analysis, the cognitive approachrequired to make correct moral judgments was sought with a focus on establishing therelationship between reason and emotion. And the implications of this neuroscientificapproach for moral education were derived. According to the results of neuroscientificresearch on people's moral judgments in the trolley dilemma and footbridge dilemma,there are many neuroscientific research results supporting that emotional intuition leads todeontological judgments and rational reasoning leads to consequential judgments. In thisway, emotional intuition and rational reasoning appear widely in human moral judgment. There is a need to find a method of moral education that can harmoniously utilize emotionalintuition, which is fast and efficient but has the potential for bias, and rational reasoning,which is slow but accurate and fair.
Abstract
In this study, the two types of moral judgment, rational reasoning and emotional intuition,were analyzed with a focus on neuroscientific interpretation of human responses in thetrolley dilemma and footbridge dilemma. Based on such analysis, the cognitive approachrequired to make correct moral judgments was sought with a focus on establishing therelationship between reason and emotion. And the implications of this neuroscientificapproach for moral education were derived. According to the results of neuroscientificresearch on people's moral judgments in the trolley dilemma and footbridge dilemma,there are many neuroscientific research results supporting that emotional intuition leads todeontological judgments and rational reasoning leads to consequential judgments. In thisway, emotional intuition and rational reasoning appear widely in human moral judgment. There is a need to find a method of moral education that can harmoniously utilize emotionalintuition, which is fast and efficient but has the potential for bias, and rational reasoning,which is slow but accurate and fair.
참고문헌 (25)
- Conway, P, "The Process Dissociation Of Moral Judgments: Clarifying The Psychology of Deontology and Utilitarianism", Doctor, pp.2013
- Cushman, F. A., "Finding faults : How moral dilemmas illuminate cognitive structure", Social Neuroscience, 7, pp.269~279 (2012)
- Gilovich, T., "Social Psychology" (2013), Norton & Company
- 김덕수, "판단력과 덕 그리고 활동여지", 철학연구, 142, pp.1~25 (2017), 대한철학회[DOI]
- 문경호, "도덕교육에서 넛지의 활용 가능성에 대한 고찰", 교원교육, 34(4), pp.193~215 (2018), 교육연구원[DOI]
- 박장호, "의무론에 대한 신경과학의 도전: 도덕교육에의 시사", 倫理硏究, 1(82), pp.73~125 (2011), 한국윤리학회[DOI]
- 박장호, "칸트의 도덕 감정 인식과 교육", 윤리교육연구, (51), pp.429~472 (2019), 한국윤리교육학회[DOI]
- Jung, C. W., "Recent trends in moral psychology research and implications for moral education", Elementary Moral Education, 37, pp.95~130 (2011)
- Greene, J. D., "An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment", Science, pp.2107~2108 (2001)
- Greene, J. D, "Moral Psychology vol. 3The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and Development", pp.35~79 (2008), The MIT Press
- Greene, J. D., "Beyond point-and-shoot morality: Why cognitive (neuro) science matters for ethics", Ethics, 124, pp.695~726 (2014)
- Haidt, J., "The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment", Psychological Review, 108, pp.814~834 (2001)
- Haidt, J, "The Happiness Hypothesis" (2006), Arrow Books
- Haidt, J., "Moral Psychology 2: The cognitive science of morality" (2008), The MIT Press
- Koenigs, M., "Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgments", Nature, 446, pp.908~911 (2007)
- Koenigs, M., "Utilitarian moral judgment in psychopathy", Social, Cognitive, and Affective Neuroscience, 7, pp.708~714 (2012)
- Narvaez, D., "Character psychology and character education", pp.140~165 (2005), University of Notre Dame Press
- Petty, R. E., "The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion", Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, pp.123~205 (1986)
- Selman, R. L., "The relation of role-taking to the development of moral judgment in children", Child Development, 42, pp.79~91 (1971)
- Simon, H. A., "A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, pp.99~118 (1955)
- Stanovich, K. E., "Individual differences in reasoning : Implications for the rationality debate", Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, pp.645~726 (2000)
- Studts, J. L., "Decision to register for the National Marrow Donor Program : rational vs emotional appeals", Bone Marrow Transplantation, 45, pp.422~428 (2010)
- Sunstein, C. R., "Nudging and choice architecture : ethical consideration", Yale Journal on Regulation, 809, pp.1~51 (2015)
- Suter, R, S., "Time and moral judgment", Cognition, 119, pp.454~458 (2011)
- Paxton J. M., "Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment", Cognitive Science, 36, pp.163~174 (2012)