에로스와 타나토스 사이의 법
Law in-between Eros and Thanatos
1
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article attempts to understand law through Freudian psychoanalytic perspective. It especially focuses on a thesis “law in-between eros and thanatos”, which is one of the key propositions suggested by the interdisciplinary study of law and Freudian psychoanalysis. As the point of balance inbetween eros and thanatos is a spot of dynamic power struggle, and as eros and thanatos interact in such a complex manner, the law which aims at reaching the balance between the two forces becomes indeterminable. But the law which is indeterminable, which struggles inbetween eros and thanatos, inbetween life and death is the very law which is expected to flourish in the coming future. However, the law which tries hard to achieve the balance between eros and thanatos cannot be an immortal authority, which it used to be, any more. The law also becomes something that circulates inbetween life and death. The most important attitude required for the law which is facing these tasks is the openness to communication with unconsciousness. Only if the law pays attention and listens to the message of unconscious instincts which were oppressed under the paradigm of modern rational law, it will be able to succeed in the task. To make the communication mutual and balanced, the law should open its mind to the emergence of new justice which conflicts with the traditional justice that it used to purse. What the interdisciplinary study of law and Freudian psychoanalysis would ask for might seem dangerous and norm-destructive in the perspective of law. But to move onto a more balanced and communicative future, law need to admit that there might be a seed of new legality in what is currently evaluated as illegal.
Abstract
This article attempts to understand law through Freudian psychoanalytic perspective. It especially focuses on a thesis “law in-between eros and thanatos”, which is one of the key propositions suggested by the interdisciplinary study of law and Freudian psychoanalysis. As the point of balance inbetween eros and thanatos is a spot of dynamic power struggle, and as eros and thanatos interact in such a complex manner, the law which aims at reaching the balance between the two forces becomes indeterminable. But the law which is indeterminable, which struggles inbetween eros and thanatos, inbetween life and death is the very law which is expected to flourish in the coming future. However, the law which tries hard to achieve the balance between eros and thanatos cannot be an immortal authority, which it used to be, any more. The law also becomes something that circulates inbetween life and death. The most important attitude required for the law which is facing these tasks is the openness to communication with unconsciousness. Only if the law pays attention and listens to the message of unconscious instincts which were oppressed under the paradigm of modern rational law, it will be able to succeed in the task. To make the communication mutual and balanced, the law should open its mind to the emergence of new justice which conflicts with the traditional justice that it used to purse. What the interdisciplinary study of law and Freudian psychoanalysis would ask for might seem dangerous and norm-destructive in the perspective of law. But to move onto a more balanced and communicative future, law need to admit that there might be a seed of new legality in what is currently evaluated as illegal.
참고문헌 (40)
- 김나경, "태아의 장애를 이유로 하는 임신중절: 사회학적 구조와 형법정책", 형사법연구, 19(1) (2007), 한국형사법학회
- 김서영, "영화로 읽는 정신분석" (2008), 은행나무
- 김정현, "몸철학" (2000), 문학과 현실사
- 박순영, "정신분석학이 현대 사상·문화에 미친 영향과 정신분석학의 전망을 통해 본 현대 위기의 진단과 처방", 해석학연구, 10, pp.323~375 (2002)
- 안성조, "법적 불확정성과 법의 지배 － The law is reason unaffected by desire Laws, when good, should be supreme -", 법철학연구, 10(2), pp.61~114 (2007), 한국법철학회
- 양천수, "초국가적 법다원주의 -개념적 차원과 규범적 차원을 중심으로 하여-", 법철학연구, 11(2), pp.391~426 (2008), 한국법철학회
- 이부영, "그림자" (2009), 한길사
- 이상돈, "기초법학" (2008), 법문사
- 이상돈, "사형폐지론의 이론과 정책. in: 한국형 법학의 새로운 지평", pp.692~718 (2006), 박영사
- 이상돈, "법정신분석학입문" (2010), 법문사
- 이소영, "동성애혼인에 대한 법적 개입의 딜레마와 가족이데올로기 해체", 법철학연구, 10(1), pp.375~404 (2007), 한국법철학회
- 이정민, "경영판단원칙과 업무상 배임죄", 형사정책연구, 18(4), pp.159~188 (2007), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이창재, "프로이트와의 대화" (2005), 학지사
- 홍성수, "규제학 - 개념, 역사, 전망", 안암법학, 통(26), pp.377~404 (2008), 안암법학회
- Adorno, T. W., "계몽의 변증법" (2006), 문학과지성사
- Dor, J., "라깡 세미나·에크리 독해I" (2009), 아난케
- Evans, D., "라깡 정신분석 사전" (2004), 인간사랑
- Fink, B., "에크리 읽기: 문자 그대로의 라캉" (2007), 도서출판b
- Freud, S., "문명 속의 불만", pp.233~329 (2005), 열린책들
- Freud, S., "<문명적> 성도덕과 현대인의 신경병. in: 문명 속의 불만", pp.9~34 (2005), 열린책들
- Freud, S., "전쟁과 죽음에 대한 고찰. in: 문명 속의 불만", pp.37~69 (2005), 열린책들
- Marcuse, H., "에로스와 문명" (2004), 나남출판
- Laplanche, J., "정신분석사전" (2005), 열린책들
- Lemaire, A., "자크 라캉" (1998), 문예출판사
- Jung, C., "정신의 본질에 관한 이론적 고찰. in: 원형과 무의식", pp.13~94 (2006), 솔출판사
- Nietzsche, F., "우상의 황혼" (2005), 책세상
- Sanford, J., "융학파 정신분석가가 본 악(惡)" (2003), 심층목회연구원출판부
- Schöpf, A., "프로이트와 현대철학" (2001), 열린책들
- Welzel, H., "자연법과 실질적 정의" (2001), 삼영사
- Bocock, R. J., "Freud and the centrality of instincts in psychoanalytic sociology", British Journal of Sociology, 28(4), pp.467~480 (1977)
- Caudill, D., "The Future of Freud in Law", pp.262~293 (1999), Routledge
- Denno, D., "Criminal Law in a Post-Freudian World", University of Illinois Law Review, pp.601~774 (2005)
- Derrida, J., "“Justice, If Such a Thing Exists”, Deconstruction in a nutshell: A conversation with Jacques Derrida", pp.125~155 (1997), Fordham University Press
- Dolar, M., "“I Shall Be with You on Your Wedding-Night”: Lacan and the Uncanny", Rendering the Real, 58, pp.5~23 (1991)
- Drassinower, A., "Freud's theory of Culture: Eros, Loss and Politics" (2003), Rowman&Littlefield
- Ehrenzweig, A., "Psychoanalytical Jurisprudence", Columbia Law Review, 65(8), pp.1331~1369 (1965)
- Gras, V., "Myth and the Reconciliation of Opposites: Jung and Levi-Strauss", Journal of the History of Ideas, 42(3), pp.471~488 (1981)
- Manderson, D., "“Requiem: Green Death－Aesthetic Interpretations and Influences in the Death Penalty”, Songs without Music", pp.93~129 (2000), University of California Press
- Valverde, M., "Pain, Memory and the Creation of the Liberal Legal Subject. in: Nietzsche and Legal Theory: Half-written Laws", pp.67~87 (2005), Routledge
- West, R., "Law, Rights, and Other Totemic Illusions", University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 134(4), pp.817~882 (1986)