안티고네 신화의 법철학적 이해
Legal Philosophical Understanding of the Myth of Antigone
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Sophocles’s tragedy Antigone has been one of the most beloved art pieces for a numerous number of philosophers and authors throughout history. In the area of jurisprudence, Antigone used to be understood as a text about the conflict between state law and natural law. However, Antigone contains much more diverse topics for legal philosophy. In this article, Hegel’s idea of ‘law’s dialectical self-development’, Derrida’s thought of ‘the deconstruction of law and its relationship to justice’, and Badiou’s suggestion of ‘law as nonlaw and nonlaw as law’ are discussed in relation to Antigone, and the question of law’s irrational source, which is raised by British legal theorists Douzinas and Warrington, is addressed. Furthermore, this article accepts and critically reinterprets those ideas to suggest ‘individual unconscious’ and the ‘Amor Fati(the love of fate)’ as the source of the force of nonlaw. Additionally, Greek mythology is invited to the arena of legal philosophy. Focus has been especially put on the power of Greek mythology to unfamiliarize current law and morality, and its function as a medium for the communication between the conscious and the unconscious. What we can learn from Hegel's theory of tragedy with regards to contemporary jurisprudence is also discussed in relation to the crime of hubris, which is one of the essential topics of Greek mythology.
Abstract
Sophocles’s tragedy Antigone has been one of the most beloved art pieces for a numerous number of philosophers and authors throughout history. In the area of jurisprudence, Antigone used to be understood as a text about the conflict between state law and natural law. However, Antigone contains much more diverse topics for legal philosophy. In this article, Hegel’s idea of ‘law’s dialectical self-development’, Derrida’s thought of ‘the deconstruction of law and its relationship to justice’, and Badiou’s suggestion of ‘law as nonlaw and nonlaw as law’ are discussed in relation to Antigone, and the question of law’s irrational source, which is raised by British legal theorists Douzinas and Warrington, is addressed. Furthermore, this article accepts and critically reinterprets those ideas to suggest ‘individual unconscious’ and the ‘Amor Fati(the love of fate)’ as the source of the force of nonlaw. Additionally, Greek mythology is invited to the arena of legal philosophy. Focus has been especially put on the power of Greek mythology to unfamiliarize current law and morality, and its function as a medium for the communication between the conscious and the unconscious. What we can learn from Hegel's theory of tragedy with regards to contemporary jurisprudence is also discussed in relation to the crime of hubris, which is one of the essential topics of Greek mythology.
참고문헌 (38)
- A. Badiou, "Theory of The Subject", pp.309~ (2009), continuum
- B. Bosteels, "Force of Nonlaw: Alain Badiou’s Theory of Justice", 29 Cardozo L. Rev, pp.1907~ (2008)
- C. Castoriadis, "World in Fragments: Writings on Politics, Society, Psychoanalysis, and the Imagination", pp.93~ (1997), Stanford University Press
- C. Douzinas, "Antigone’s law: A genealogy of jurisprudence, In Politics, Postmodernity and Critical Legal Studies", pp.189~ (1994), Routeledge
- D. Manderson, "Requiem: Green Death-Aesthetic Interpretations and Influences in the Death Penalty, In Songs without music", pp.95~ (2000), University of California Press
- D. Reidy, "Antigone, Hegel & The Law: An Essay", 19 Legal Stud. F, 239, pp.239~ (1995)
- E. Gemmette, "Law and Literature: Joining the Class Action", 29 Valparaiso L. Rev, 665, pp.686~ (1995)
- F. Nietzsche, "“나는 왜 이렇게 영리한지,” 이 사람을 보라", pp.373~374 (2005), 책세상
- G. Steiner, Antigones, "The Antigone Myth in Western Literature, Art and Thought" (1986), Oxford
- G.W.F. Hegel, "헤겔미학 II. 동양예술, 서양예술의 대립과 예술의 종말", pp.249~ (1996), 나남신서
- G.W.F. Hegel, "정신현상학 2", pp.46~ (2005), 한길사
- J. Butler, "안티고네의 주장", pp.98~ (2005), 동문선
- J. Derrida, "법의 힘", pp.58~ (2005), 문학과지성사
- J. Lacan, "The Ethics of Psychoanalysis", pp.279~ (1992), Norton
- M. Howenstein, "The Tragedy of Law and the Law of Tragedy in Sophocles’ Antigone", 24 Legal Stud. F, 493, pp.493~ (2000)
- Mark W. Roche(번역: 심철민), "헤겔 비극론의 위대성과 한계", 헤겔연구, (19), pp.19~68 (2006), 한국헤겔학회
- R. Posner, Law, , pp.124~ (2009), Harvard University Press
- R. Sterne, "Endorsing Ethical Natural Law: A Reply to David A. Reidy’s “Antigone, Hegel & The Law", 19 Legal Stud. F, 263, pp.263~ (1995)
- S. Freud, "“두려운 낯설음,” 예술, 문학, 정신분석", pp.405~411 (2007), 열린책들
- Sophokles, "“안티고네,” 오이디푸스왕·안티고네", pp.407~ (2011), 문예출판사
- T. Eagleton, "우리 시대의 비극론", pp.263~264 (2006), 경성대학교출판부
- W. Conklin, "Hegel, the Author and Authority in Sophocles’ Antigone, In Law in Greek Political Thought", pp.139~140 (1997), Rowman & Littlefield
- 이상돈, "법정신분석학입문" (2010), 법문사
- 박동준, "안티고네(Antigone)의 문학적 신화 창조와 변천", 프랑스학 연구, 18, pp.198~ (2000)
- 안재오, "인륜성의 비극 ―예나 시절 헤겔의 자연법 논문에 나타난 고대 그리스 비극 개념 연구", 헤겔연구, (10), pp.143~ (2001)
- 오정진, "영화와 법의 만남", 법학연구, 48(1), pp.93~112 (2007), 법학연구소
- 원준호, "포스트구조주의의 헤겔 정치철학 비판에 대한 반(反)비판－ 헤겔에서의 가족과 국가의 가부장성에 대한 데리다의 비판을 중심으로 －", 헤겔연구, (16), pp.113~138 (2004), 한국헤겔학회
- 이상돈, "법이론", pp.135~ (2005), 세창출판사
- 이상돈, "문헌연구 포스트모더니즘과 법", pp.179~190 (2006), 세창출판사
- 이소영, "법문학", pp.104~106 (2005), 新英社
- 이소영, "법문학비평과 소수자의 내러티브 ―박민규, 윤성희, 김애란의 단편소설에 대한 법문학비평―", 법철학연구, 14(1), pp.205~232 (2011), 한국법철학회
- 이윤기, "그리스 로마 신화 제2권", pp.131~132 (2010), 웅진지식하우스
- 임철규, "죽음의 미학-안티고네의 죽음", 현상과 인식, 2(2), pp.97~ (1978)
- 임철규, "그리스 비극", pp.282~ (2007), 한길사
- 장영란, "우리 신화학은 어디에 서 있는가?", 문학과경계, 2(1), pp.92~ (2002)
- 장영란, "그리스 신화", pp.320~ (2005), 살림
- 최봉철, "해체적 정의와 법적 판단", 법과사회, 11, pp.312~ (1995)
- 최혜영, "안티고네 담론 소포클레스 및 세네카, 장 아누이, 브레히트를 중심으로 본 소재의 변용", 서양고전학연구, 27(27), pp.151~186 (2006), 한국서양고전학회